Pneumatic unit use with built-in tank in metal rolling hallmarking impact mechanisms

Authors

  • Юрий Леонидович Атаманов Ltd. "Harkovgazoborudovanie", Kooperativnaja, etc., 6/8, was Kharkov, Ukraine, 61003, Ukraine
  • Геннадий Анатолиевич Крутиков National Technical University «Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute», Frunze, etc., 21, was Kharkov, Ukraine, 03037, Ukraine
  • Марьяна Георгиевна Стрижак National Technical University «Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute», Frunze, etc., 21, was Kharkov, Ukraine, 03037, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2013.16683

Keywords:

pneumatic impact actuator, hallmarking mechanism, mathematical model, cylinder and air distributor operation synchronization

Abstract

The paper considers the problems of selection of pneumatic impact drive structure and its mathematical model. It gives the results of the PC testing of the pneumatic actuator activation process using various wiring schemes of actuating mechanism.

It is shown that one of the most efficient schemes of pneumatic impact actuator is the scheme with the built-in tank (accumulator).

The proposed mathematical model of pneumatic impact unit is universal and allows studying pneumatic actuators with the built-in tank with various schemes and control algorithms. During the research of internal transient processes in addition to pressure the temperature change in the pneumatic unit cavity while its activation was also measured. It is shown that conventional wiring scheme of impact pneumatic cylinder is accompanied by an oscillatory process, which complicates its use in hallmarking units.

Based on the PC research it is determined that pneumatic scheme with cylinder and air distributor operation synchronization allows achieving the most efficient pulse impact which in the area of movement of 0.15m provides the motion speed of the output link of about 4 m/s.

This mode is the most applicable for the hallmarking, broaching and forging processes

Author Biographies

Юрий Леонидович Атаманов, Ltd. "Harkovgazoborudovanie", Kooperativnaja, etc., 6/8, was Kharkov, Ukraine, 61003

Director

Геннадий Анатолиевич Крутиков, National Technical University «Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute», Frunze, etc., 21, was Kharkov, Ukraine, 03037

Professor

Department «Gіdropnevmoavtomatika i gіdroprivod»

Марьяна Георгиевна Стрижак, National Technical University «Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute», Frunze, etc., 21, was Kharkov, Ukraine, 03037

Engineer

Department «Handling machinery and equipment»

References

  1. Абраменков, Э. А. Пневматические механизмы машин ударного действия: дроссельные, беззолотниковые, безклапанные. Справочное пособие [Текст] / Э. А. Абраименков, Д. Э. Абраименков. – Новосибирск: Изд-во Новосибирского университета, 1993. – 430 с.
  2. Термодинамика. Терминология [Текст] / Отв. ред. И.И. Новиков. – М.: Наука, 1973. – 54 с.
  3. Крутиков, Г. А. Определение степени энергетического совершенства пневмоприводов дискретного действия [Текст] / Г. А. Крутиков // Гидропривод и гидропневмоавтоматика. – 1985. – Вып. 21. – С. 34–42.
  4. Цейтлин, Ю. А. Пневматические установки шахт [Текст] / Ю. А. Цейтлин, В. А. Мурзин. – М.: Недра, 1991. – 268 с.
  5. Пневматические системы управления станками, прессами и другими машинами. Альбом схем [Текст] / Под. Ред. И. М. Степунина. – М.: Научно-исследовательский институт информации по машиностроению, 1971. – 215 с.
  6. Герц, Е. В. Расчёт пневмоприводов. Справочное пособие [Текст] / Е. В. Герц, Г. В. Крейнин. – М.: Машиностроение, 1975. – 278 с.
  7. Мамонтов, М. А. Вопросы термодинамики тела переменной массы [Текст] / М. А. Мамонтов. – М.: Оборонгиз, 1961. – 183 с.
  8. Tsai, D. H. Dynamic Behavier of a Simple Pneumatic Reducer [Текст] / D. H. Tsai, R. L. Cassidy // ASME. IRD Meeting. – Paper 60. – 1961. – T. 86. – C. 15-24.
  9. Мамонтов, М. А. Метод аналогичности в анализе и синтезе пневматических двигателей [Текст] / М. А. Мамонтов // Теория машин-автоматов и пневмогидроприводов. – 1966. – Вып. 16. – С. 18–23.
  10. Логов, И. Л. Пневматические насосы [Текст] / И. Л. Логов. – М.: Машгиз, 1972. – 243 с.
  11. Abramenkov, E. (1993). Pneumatic machinery machines impact: throttle, no spool, no valve. A Reference Guide. Novosibirsk, Russia: Publisher University of Novosibirsk.
  12. Novikov, I. (1973). Thermodynamics. Terminology. Moscow, USSR: Science.
  13. Krutikov, G. (1985). Determining the degree of energy perfection of pneumatic units discrete action. Hydraulic drive and hydropneumoautomation, 21, 34-42.
  14. Zeitlin, J. (1991). Pneumatic installation of mines. Moscow, USSR: Bowels.
  15. Stepunin, I. (1971). Pneumatic control machine tools, presses and other machines. Album schemes. Moscow, USSR: Scientific-Research Institute of Mechanical Engineering Information.
  16. Gertz, E. (1975). Calculation of pneumatic actuators. A Reference Guide. Moscow, USSR: Machine building.
  17. Mamontov, М. (1961). Aspects of the thermodynamics of the body of variable mass. Moscow, USSR: Oborongiz.
  18. Tsai, D. H., Cassidy R. L. (1961). Dynamic Behavier of a Simple Pneumatic Reducer. ASME. IRD Meeting, 60, 15-24.
  19. Mamontov, М. (1966). Similar methods in the analysis and synthesis of air motors. The theory of automatic machines and pneumo-hydraulic units, 16, 18–23.
  20. Logov, I. (1972). Pneumatic pumps. Moscow, USSR: Mashgiz.

Published

2013-07-30

How to Cite

Атаманов, Ю. Л., Крутиков, Г. А., & Стрижак, М. Г. (2013). Pneumatic unit use with built-in tank in metal rolling hallmarking impact mechanisms. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 4(7(64), 32–35. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2013.16683

Issue

Section

Applied mechanics