Construction of models for estimating the technical condition of a hydrogenerator using fuzzy data on the state of its local nodes

Authors

  • Mykola Kosterev National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute” Peremohy ave., 37, Kyiv, Ukraine, 03056, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5601-2607
  • Volodymyr Litvinov Affiliate “Dnipro Hydro Power Plant”, PJSC “Ukrhydroenergo” Vintera blvd., 1, Zaporizhia, Ukraine, 69096, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1974-0976
  • Kateryna Kilova Dnipro Region NEC “Ukrenergo” Hrebelna str., 2, Zaporizhia, Ukraine, 69096, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2019.180211

Keywords:

hydrogenerator, fuzzy logic, Mamdani model, Sugeno model, Zadeh method, simplified method

Abstract

The task on estimating the technical condition of a hydrogenerator under conditions of fuzzy information has been resolved. To this end, a series of models have been constructed for the integrated estimation of the technical condition of a hydrogenerator based on data about the states of its local nodes. The technical states of local nodes are determined based on the earlier devised fuzzy models of the Mamdani type and represent the fuzzy values, which was taken into consideration in the model for estimating technical condition of a hydrogenerator.

The fuzzy methods by Mamdani, Sugeno, Zadeh, as well as the simplified fuzzy inference, were used to build the models. The fuzzy model by Mamdani has a qualitative base of rules only, which simplifies its construction by an expert. The models based on the fuzzy algorithm by Sugeno imply a rule base with weight coefficients, determined by the Saati method. The simplified method and the method by Zadeh require minimal expert participation when constructing a fuzzy model. Examples of estimating the technical condition of a hydrogenerator have been considered based on five devised fuzzy models; the sensitivity of models to the quality and reliability of input information has been tested.

It has been determined that the most reliable result from estimating the state of a hydrogenerator with an error of 1.5–2 % is produced by models built according to Zadeh method and the simplified fuzzy inference, since they have the least dependence on the uncertainty of input data on the states of local nodes, which themselves were obtained based on fuzzy models. High accuracy of these models and low dependence on the quality of incoming information are explained by the minimal participation of an expert during its configuration. The fuzzy models built using the algorithms by Mamdani and Sugeno yield a greater error of 3–4 %. Oure findings could be used to assess the remaining or spent resource of hydrogenerators, the probability of their failure over a time interval, and to execute the risk-oriented control over an electricity energy system and its subsystems

Author Biographies

Mykola Kosterev, National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute” Peremohy ave., 37, Kyiv, Ukraine, 03056

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor

Department of Renewable Energy Sources

Volodymyr Litvinov, Affiliate “Dnipro Hydro Power Plant”, PJSC “Ukrhydroenergo” Vintera blvd., 1, Zaporizhia, Ukraine, 69096

PhD, Head of Production and Technical Department

Production and Technical Department

Kateryna Kilova, Dnipro Region NEC “Ukrenergo” Hrebelna str., 2, Zaporizhia, Ukraine, 69096

Engineer

Department of Advanced Development of Transmission Systems

References

  1. Kosterev, M., Litvinov, V. (2018). Priority events determination for the risk-oriented management of electric power system. EUREKA: Physics and Engineering, 3, 21–32. doi: https://doi.org/10.21303/2461-4262.2018.00643
  2. Litvinov, V. V., Manukian, K. A. (2014). Fuzzy-Statistical Modeling of Hydrogenerator for Its Reliability Appreciation. The International Journal Of Engineering And Science, 3 (1), 85–95.
  3. Litvinov, V. V., Kilova, K. A. (2018). Otsiniuvannia tekhnichnoho stanu mekhanichnykh vuzliv hidroheneratora. Hidroenerhetyka Ukrainy, 1-2, 44–48.
  4. Bellman, R. E., Zadeh, L. A. (1970). Decision-Making in a Fuzzy Environment. Management Science, 17 (4). doi: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.17.4.b141
  5. Jagadeesh, B., Sanker, B. V. (2011). Evaluation of synchronous generator reactance using finite element method (FEM). Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 27 (2), 68–76. URL: http://www.jatit.org/volumes/research-papers/Vol27No2/2Vol27No2.pdf
  6. Faiz, J., Ebrahimi, B. M., Valavi, M., Toliyat, H. A. (2009). Mixed eccentricity fault diagnosis in salient-pole synchronous generator using modified winding function method. Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, 11, 155–172. doi: https://doi.org/10.2528/pierb08110903
  7. Duraisamy, V., Devarajan, N., Vinoth Kumar, P. S., Sivanandam, S. N., Somasundareswari, D. (2005). A fuzzy based fault detection scheme for synchronous generator. Academic Open Internet Journal, 14.
  8. Xie, H., Bo, Y., Yanpeng, H. (2003). Diagnosis of Stator Winding Insulation of Large Generator. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Properties and Applications of Dielectric Materials (Cat. No.03CH37417). doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/icpadm.2003.1218405
  9. Frolov, M. Yu., Fishov, A. G. (2007). Identification of Synchronous Generator Electric Parameters Connected to the Distribution Grid. Problemele Energeticii Regionale, 1 (33), 32–39.
  10. Wang, L., Li, Y., Li, J. (2018). Diagnosis of Inter-Turn Short Circuit of Synchronous Generator Rotor Winding Based on Volterra Kernel Identification. Energies, 11 (10), 2524. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/en11102524
  11. Yucai, W., Yonggang, L. (2015). Diagnosis of Rotor Winding Interturn Short-Circuit in Turbine Generators Using Virtual Power. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 30 (1), 183–188. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/tec.2014.2339300
  12. Yucai, W., Minghan, M., Yonggang, L. (2018). A New Detection Coil Capable of Performing Online Diagnosis of Excitation Winding Short-Circuits in Steam-Turbine Generators. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 33 (1), 106–115. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/tec.2017.2741503
  13. Maraaba, L., Al-Hamouz, Z., Abido, M. (2018). An Efficient Stator Inter-Turn Fault Diagnosis Tool for Induction Motors. Energies, 11 (3), 653. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/en11030653
  14. Klir, G. J., Yuan, B. (1995). Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic: Theory and Applications. Prentice Hall, 592.
  15. Saaty, T. L. (1990). Eigenvector and logarithmic least squares. European Journal of Operational Research, 48 (1), 156–160. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90073-k
  16. Kosteriev, M. V., Bardyk, Ye. I. (2011). Pytannia pobudovy nechitkykh modelei otsinky tekhnichnoho stanu obiektiv elektrychnykh system. Kyiv: NTUU «KPI», 148.

Downloads

Published

2019-10-09

How to Cite

Kosterev, M., Litvinov, V., & Kilova, K. (2019). Construction of models for estimating the technical condition of a hydrogenerator using fuzzy data on the state of its local nodes. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5(8 (101), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2019.180211

Issue

Section

Energy-saving technologies and equipment