Method of assessment and predicting of influence on air pollution of technogenic urboecosystem

Authors

  • Тетяна Борисівна Кудрявська National Technical University of Ukraine "Kyiv Polytechnic Institute" Str. Borschagivska, 115, Kiev, Ukraine, 03056, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5620-3622
  • Аліна Олегівна Дичко National Technical University of Ukraine "Kyiv Polytechnic Institute" Str. Borschagivska, 115, Kiev, Ukraine, 03056, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4632-3203

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2014.19882

Keywords:

maximum admissible concentration, environmentally admissible concentration, urboecosystem, abortiveness, bioindicator

Abstract

Disadvantages of the concept of maximum admissible concentrations call into question the reliability of modern methods for assessment and prediction of environmental conditions, so there is a need to develop new approaches. These approaches are based on the bioindication methods, as they are sensitive, reliable and sufficient for an adequate environmental assessment. The method of assessing the pollutant impact  on the urboecosystem state was first introduced in the paper. It differs from the known by the fact that it uses biomonitoring data and considers environmentally admissible concentrations, defined on the basis of the determined dependence of abortiveness indicator of plant-bioindicator pollen on the pollutant concentration value  for assessing the environmental condition. Also, the adequacy of this method was verified on the example of Kyiv. Environmentally admissible concentrations for significant abiotic factors and environmentally safe limits for relatively significant were determined. It is shown that existing standards exceed the values of environmentally admissible concentrations and environmentally safe limits by about 20 %.

Author Biographies

Тетяна Борисівна Кудрявська, National Technical University of Ukraine "Kyiv Polytechnic Institute" Str. Borschagivska, 115, Kiev, Ukraine, 03056

Postgraduate

Department of Environmental Engineering

Аліна Олегівна Дичко, National Technical University of Ukraine "Kyiv Polytechnic Institute" Str. Borschagivska, 115, Kiev, Ukraine, 03056

Ph.D, docent

Department of Environmental Engineering

References

  1. Абакумов, В. А. Экологические модификации и развитие биоценозов [Текст] / В. А. Абакумов // Экологические модификации и критерии экологического нормирования. Труды международного симпозиума. – 1991. – С. 18-40.
  2. Левич, А. П. Биотическая концепция контроля природной среды [Текст] / А. П. Левич // Доклады РАН. – 1994. – Т. 337, №2. – С. 280-282.
  3. Федоров, В. Д. К стратегии биологического мониторинга [Текст] / В. Д. Федеров // Биол. науки. – 1974. – №10. – С. 7-17.
  4. Попова, О. В. Биоиндикация загрязнения атмосферы промышленного города: на примере г. Липецка [Текст] : автореф. дис. канд. геогр. наук : 25.00.36 / О. В. Попова; Воронежский государственный университет. – Воронеж, 2007. – 21 с.
  5. Николаевский, В. С. Экологическая оценка загрязнения среды и состояния наземних екосистем методами фитоиндикации [Текст] / В. С. Николаевский. – М.: Изд-во Московского университета. – 1998. – 192 с.
  6. Максимов, В. Н. Проблемы комплексной оценки качества природных вод (экологические аспекты) [Текст] / В. Н. Максимов // Гидробиологический журнал. – 1991а. – Т. 27. – №3. – С.8-13.
  7. Чесноков, С. В. Детерминационный анализ социально-экономических данных [Текст] / С. В. Чесноков. – М.: Наука, 1982. – 168 с.
  8. Бертиз, С. Влияние загрязнений воздуха на растительность [Текст]: пер. с англ. / С. Бертиз. – М.: Наука, 1989. – 258 с.
  9. Grant, W. F. The present status of higher plant for the detection of environmental mutagens [Текст] / W. F. Grant // Mutation Research. — 1994. –Vol. 310. — №2. — P. 175 –185.
  10. Калінін, М. І. Біометрія [Текст] : підруч. / М. І. Калінін, В. В. Єлісєєв. – Миколаїв. : Вид-во МФ НаУКМА, 2000. – 204 с.
  11. Лакин, Г. Ф. Биометрия [Текст] : учеб. пособие / Г. Ф. Лакин. – М.: Высш. шк., 1990. – 352 с.
  12. Abakumov, V. A. (1991). Environmental modification and development biotsenozov. Ekologicheskie modifikatsii i kriterii ekologicheskogo normirovaniya. Trudyi mezhdunarodnogo simpoziuma, 18-40.
  13. Levich, A. P. (1994). Biotic control concept of the environment. Dokladyi RAN, Vol. 337, № 2, 280-282.
  14. Fedorov, V. D (1974). For biological monitoring strategy. Biological sciences, № 10, 7-17.
  15. Popova, O. V. (2007). «Bioindication pollution industrial city: the example of the city of Lipetsk» thesis abstract for Cand. Sc (geoecology), 25.00.36Voronezh State University, Voronezh, Russia.
  16. Nikolaevskiy, V. S.(1998). Environmental assessment of pollution and methods of terrestrial ecosystems phytoindication. Moscow, Russia. Izd-vo Moskovskogo universiteta, 192.
  17. Maksimov, V. N. (1991). Problems integrated assessment of water quality (environmental aspects). Hydrobiological journal, Vol.27, № 3, 8-13.
  18. Chesnokov, S. V. (1982). Determination analysis of socio-economic data. Moscow, Russia. Nauka, 168.
  19. Bertiz, S and Enderlein, X (1989). The influence of air pollution on plants. Moskow, Russia. Nauka, 258.
  20. Grant, W. F. (1994). The present status of higher plant for the detection of environmental mutagens. Mutation Research, Vol. 310, № 2, 175–185.
  21. Kalinin, M. I., Yelisyeyev, V. V. (2000). Biometrics. Nikolaev, Ukraine, MF NaUKMA, 204.
  22. Lakin, G. F (1990), Biometrics. Moskow, Russia. Vyisshaya shkola, 352.

Published

2014-02-04

How to Cite

Кудрявська, Т. Б., & Дичко, А. О. (2014). Method of assessment and predicting of influence on air pollution of technogenic urboecosystem. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1(10(67), 4–7. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2014.19882