The ways for network information resource aggressive user’s influence reduction

Authors

  • Денис Миколайович Самойленко National University of Shipbuilding after Admiral Makarov Lenin ave 3, Mykolaiv, 54010, Ukraine, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3205-1174

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2014.20339

Keywords:

network resources, information aggression, information security, resource complexity, websites design

Abstract

Despite the popularity of design methods on the simplification principles, still little attention has been paid to the problems of adapting these principles to the problems of network information resources design, intended for interacting with humans. A model of user’s interaction with the network information resource “familiarization - comprehension - selection - action”, which takes into account various stages of mental load, the level of which is suggested to consider as a complexity measure is first proposed in the paper. The factors, influencing the complexity of each interaction model phase are singled out and described, the contributions of information, semantic, combinatorial complexity, as well as selection complexity, are taken into account; the recommendations for the network information resource developer on reducing the final complexity of the developed product, defining the aggressiveness of its perception are given in the paper. The method for estimating the complexity of random information resource, allowing to determine the direction of its improvements and assess the effectiveness of the taken measures is submitted for consideration

Author Biography

Денис Миколайович Самойленко, National University of Shipbuilding after Admiral Makarov Lenin ave 3, Mykolaiv, 54010, Ukraine

PhD, docent

Department of ship electrical equipment and information security

References

  1. Пилипчук, В. Г. Системні проблеми становлення і розвитку науки в інформаційній сфері [Текст] / В. Г. Пилипчук // Стратегічні пріоритети. – 2012. – № 2 (23). – С. 143-148.
  2. Дубов, Д. В. Забезпечення національних інтересів держави в інформаційному суспільстві: трансформація пріоритетів. [Текст] / Д. В. Дубов // Стратегічні пріоритети. – 2012. – №3(24). – С. 120-125.
  3. Налимов, В. В. Спонтанность сознания: Вероятностная теория смыслов и смысловая архитектоника личности. [Текст] / В. В. Налимов. – М.: «Прометей», 1989. – 288 с. ISBN 5-7042-0083-4.
  4. Почепцов, Г. Смислові та інформаційні війни: пошук відмінностей [Електронний ресурс] / Медіаграмотність. Режим доступу http://osvita. mediasapiens.ua/print/material/16366 (дата звернення: 10.12.13). – Назва з екрану.
  5. Bourbaki, N. Worse is Better is Worse [Електронний ресурс] / Nickieben Bourbaki. Режим доступу http://dreamsongs.com/Files/worse-is-worse.pdf (дата звернення: 10.12.13). – Назва з екрану.
  6. Misra, R. Outsourcing of Healthcare Services: Issues and a Framework for Success [Текст] / Ram Misra, Shankar Srinivasan, Dinesh Mital // Journal of Information Technology and Applications. – 2006.– Vol. 1. – No.2. – P. 79-88.
  7. Раскин, Д. Интерфейс: новые направления в проектировании компьютерных систем. [Текст] / Д. Раскин – СПб: Символ-плюс, 2010. – 272 с.
  8. Самойленко, Д. М. Методика встановлення семантичної складності завдань. [Текст] : Матеріали всеукраїнської НТК з міжнародною участю «Проблеми автоматики та електрообладнання транспортних засобів» (квіт. 20-13) / Отв. ред. О. В. Нікітіна. – Миколаїв: НУК, 2013. – с. 19-22.
  9. Fodor, J. Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong. [Текст] / Jerry A. Fodor. – Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998. – 174 p.
  10. Величковский, Б. М. Когнитивная наука: Основы психологии познания: в 2 т. [Текст] / Величковский Б. М. – М.: Издательский центр «Академия», 2006. – 448 с.
  11. Eysenck, M. Cognitive Psychology (Fourth Edition). [Текст] / M. Eysenck, M. Keane. – Hove and New York: Psychology Press, 2005. – 703 p.
  12. Борисов, С. В. Справочник по инженерной психологи. [Текст] / С. В. Борисов, В. А. Денисов, Б. А. Душков / под ред. Б. Ф. Ломова. – М: Машиностроение, 1982. – 368 с.
  13. Литвин, В. В. Модель представлення знань за допомогою об’єктів для побудови інтелектуальних систем підтримки прийняття рішень. [Текст] / В. В. Литвин, Д. Г. Досин, Р. Р. Даревич, Т. М. Пугач // Штучний інтелект. – 2004. – № 3. – C. 343-349.
  14. Кукол, І. І. Тенденції застосування корпоративних кольорів банками України [Електронний ресурс] / Сучасна економічна наука: нові гіпотези, тенденції та перспективи розвитку. – Режим доступу: http://bankbusiness-l.ucoz.ua/load/0-0-0-134-20 (дата звернення: 10.01.14). – Назва з екрана.
  15. Pylypchuk, V. G. (2012). System problems of foundation and progress of IT science. Strategic priorities, 2(23), 143-148.
  16. Dubov, D. V. (2012). National interests’ service in information society: priorities transformation. . Strategic priorities, 3(24), 120-125.
  17. Nalimov, V. V. (1989). Stochastic mentality: probable theory of senses and personality architectonics. Moscow: Prometheus.
  18. Pocheptsov, G. (2013). Sense and information wars: the differences. Retrieved December 10, 2012. Available at: http://osvita. mediasapiens.ua/print/material/16366.
  19. Bourbaki, N. (2000). Worse is Better is Worse. Retrieved December 10, 2012. Available at: http://dreamsongs.com/Files/worse-is-worse.pdf.
  20. Misra, R., Srinivasan, S, Mital, D. (2006). Outsourcing of Healthcare Services: Issues and a Framework for Success. Journal of Information Technology and Applications, 1(2), 79-88.
  21. Raskin, D. (2010). Interface: new directions in computer system projection. Sankt Petersburg: Symbol-Plus.
  22. Samoilenko, D. M. (2013). The methodic for task semantic complexity estimation. In Materials of scientific conference “Problems of automatics and electric equipment of transport”. Mykolaiv, 19-22.
  23. Fodor, J. (1998). Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  24. Velichkovskii, B. M. (2006). Cognitive science: perception psychology basics. Moscow: Academics Press.
  25. Eysenck, M. & Keane, M. (2005). Cognitive Psychology (Fourth Edition). Hove and New York: Psychology Press.
  26. Lomov, B. F. (Ed.). (1982). Engineer psychology directory. Moscow: Mashinostroenie.
  27. Litvin, V. V., Dosin, D. G., Darevich, R. R. & Pugach, T. M. (2004). Object knowledge model in intellectual expert systems. Artificial intellect, 3, 343-349.
  28. Kukol, I. I. (2013). Corporative colors usage tends in Ukrainian bank system. Retrieved January 10, 2014 from http://bank-businessl. ucoz.ua/load/0-0-0-134-20.

Downloads

Published

2014-02-05

How to Cite

Самойленко, Д. М. (2014). The ways for network information resource aggressive user’s influence reduction. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1(9(67), 46–50. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2014.20339

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 9(67) (2014): Information and controlling system

Section

Information and controlling system

License

Copyright (c) 2014 Денис Миколайович Самойленко

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.

A license agreement is a document in which the author warrants that he/she owns all copyright for the work (manuscript, article, etc.).
The authors, signing the License Agreement with TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC, have all rights to the further use of their work, provided that they link to our edition in which the work was published.
According to the terms of the License Agreement, the Publisher TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC does not take away your copyrights and receives permission from the authors to use and dissemination of the publication through the world's scientific resources (own electronic resources, scientometric databases, repositories, libraries, etc.).
In the absence of a signed License Agreement or in the absence of this agreement of identifiers allowing to identify the identity of the author, the editors have no right to work with the manuscript.
It is important to remember that there is another type of agreement between authors and publishers – when copyright is transferred from the authors to the publisher. In this case, the authors lose ownership of their work and may not use it in any way.