Devising a procedure for substantiating the type and volume of redundant structural-functional elements of reconnaissance-firing systems

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.229031

Keywords:

reconnaissance-firing systems, survivability, reliability scheme, structural and functional scheme

Abstract

This paper proposes an algorithm for substantiating the type and volume of redundant structural and functional elements of reconnaissance-firing systems, taking into consideration the operational patterns of such systems. Underlying this algorithm is the combination of survivability assessment methods and reliability assessment methods. Such an arrangement aimed to improve the efficiency of the application of these methods and reduce uncertainty in the calculations.

The results from calculating an example of the application of a procedure for substantiating the type and volume of redundant structural and functional elements of reconnaissance-firing systems have been analyzed. The analysis of the results shows that the set task is fulfilled, in particular the specified probability of trouble-free functioning of a reconnaissance-firing system, with a combined type of redundancy. Moreover, it implies giving preference to passive redundancy, using active one only to critical elements – individual functional elements of the control subsystem. The advantage of a mixed type of redundancy over a passive redundancy is 28 %. In addition, it has been established that the multiplicity of redundancy, for accepted conditions, should not be lower than 2. A procedure for substantiating the type and volume of redundant structural and functional elements of reconnaissance-firing systems has been devised, taking into consideration the operational patterns of such systems. The specified procedure includes an algorithm, as well as methods for assessing survivability and methods for assessing the reliability of functioning. This procedure was tested for feasibility by considering an example of justifying the type and volume of redundant structural and functional elements of reconnaissance-firing systems that produced an adequate result. The result has been confirmed by the practical application of reconnaissance-firing systems in recent armed conflicts

Author Biographies

Oleksandr Maistrenko, The National Defence University of Ukraine named after Ivan Cherniakhovskyi

Doctor of Military Sciences, Leading Researcher

Scientific and Methodological Center of Scientific, Scientific and Technical Activities Organization

Oleksandr Karavanov, Hetman Petro Sahaidachnyi National Army Academy

Adjunct

Scientific and Organizational Department

Oleksii Riman, The National Defence University of Ukraine named after Ivan Cherniakhovskyi

PhD

Department of Rocket Troops and Artillery

Volodymyr Kurban, The National Defence University of Ukraine named after Ivan Cherniakhovskyi

PhD, Deputy Head of Scientific and Methodological Center

Scientific and Methodological Center of Scientific, Scientific and Technical Activities Organization

Andrii Shcherba, Hetman Petro Sahaidachnyi National Army Academy

PhD, Associate Professor, Senior Lecturer

Department of Complexes and Devices of Artillery Recconaissance

Ihor Volkov, Scientific-Research Center of Missile Troops and Artillery

PhD, Deputy Head of the Center for Scientific Work

Taras Kravets, Hetman Petro Sahaidachnyi National Army Academy

PhD, Lecturer

Department of Complexes and Devices of Artillery Recconaissance

Galina Semiv, Hetman Petro Sahaidachnyi National Army Academy

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Rocket Artillery Armament

References

  1. Harris, C., Kagan, F. (2018). Introduction. Russia’s military posture: ground forces order of battle. Institute for the Study of War, 9–11. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep17469
  2. Czuperski, M., Herbst, J., Higgins, E., Polyakova, A., Wilson, D. (2015). Hiding in plain sight: Putinʹs War in Ukraine. Atlantic Council. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep03631
  3. Majstrenko, O. V., Bubenshсhykov, R. V., Bondar, R. V., Poplinskyi, O. V. (2018). Determination of constituents of fire defeat of opponent by the method of construction "tree of aims". Modern Information Technologies in the Sphere of Security and Defence, 32 (2), 45–50. doi: https://doi.org/10.33099/2311-7249/2018-32-2-45-50
  4. Nichol, J. (2009) Russia-Georgia Conflict in August 2008: Context and Implications for U.S. Interests. Congressional Research Service. Available at: https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a496306.pdf
  5. Majstrenko, O. V., Prokopenko, V. V., Makeev, V. I., Ivanyk, E. G. (2020). Analytical methods of calculation of powered and passive trajectory of reactive and rocket-assisted projectiles. Radio Electronics, Computer Science, Control, 2, 173–182. doi: https://doi.org/10.15588/1607-3274-2020-2-18
  6. Luttwak, E. N. (2001). Strategy: The Logic of War and Peace, Revised and Enlarged Edition. Harvard University Press, 320. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1c7zfsc
  7. DSTU 2860-94. Dependability of Technics. Terms and definitions. Available at: https://dnaop.com/html/2273/doc-%D0%94%D0%A1%D0%A2%D0%A3_2860-94
  8. Maistrenko, O., Ryzhov, Y., Khaustov, D., Tsybulia, S., Nastishin, Y. (2021). Decision-Making Model for Task Execution by a Military Unit in Terms of Queuing Theory. Military Operations Research, 26 (1), 59–70. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26995958
  9. Kovl, V. (2020). Improved complex of principles for use of force and means of military facilities camouflage from technical means of air reconnaissance and guidance of enemy weapons. Systems of Arms and Military Equipment, 3 (63), 13–18. https://doi.org/10.30748/soivt.2020.63.02
  10. Sivak, V., Klyat, Y. (2020). Improved method of rapid restoration of airborne equipment and armament of assault troops on the criterion of ensuring their survivability. Collection of Scientific Works of the National Academy of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine. Series: Military and Technical Sciences, 79 (1), 230–239. doi: https://doi.org/10.32453/3.v79i1.109
  11. Kucherenko, Y., Nosyk, A., Simonov, S., Shubin, Y. (2020). Methodology for estimating efficiency of reliability of functioning of automated military system, as complex organizational-technical system. Systems of Arms and Military Equipment, 3(63), 24–30. doi: https://doi.org/10.30748/soivt.2020.63.04
  12. Medvedev, V. K., Kasyanenko, M. V., Korenivska, I. S. (2018). The approach to evaluation automated management system of Oreanda-PS reliability. Modern Information Technologies in the Sphere of Security and Defence, 33 (3), 81–86. doi: https://doi.org/10.33099/2311-7249/2018-33-3-81-86
  13. Kredentser, B., Mohylevych, D., Kononova, I. (2017). An estimation of a prize in reliability at complex use of redundancy in objects of telecommunication. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats [Viyskovoho instytutu telekomunikatsiy ta informatyzatsiyi], 2, 48–57.
  14. Vintr, Z., Valis, D. (2008). Reliability Modelling of Automatic Gun with Pyrotechnic Charging. Advances in Military Technology, 3 (1), 33–42.
  15. Mashkov, O. A., Sobchuk, V. V., Barabash, O. V., Dakhno, N. B. et. al. (2019). Improvement of variational-gradient method in dynamical systems of automated control for integro-differential models. Mathematical Modeling and Computing, 6 (2), 344–357. doi: https://doi.org/10.23939/mmc2019.02.344
  16. Barabash, O., Dakhno, N., Shevchenko, H., Sobchuk, V. (2018). Integro-Differential Models of Decision Support Systems for Controlling Unmanned Aerial Vehicles on the Basis of Modified Gradient Method. 2018 IEEE 5th International Conference on Methods and Systems of Navigation and Motion Control (MSNMC). doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/msnmc.2018.8576310
  17. Mandziy, B., Seniv, M., Kuts, B. (2013). Software implementation of reliability model of renewable technical system with constant loaded reserve. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 3 (9 (63)), 18–23. Available at: http://journals.uran.ua/eejet/article/view/14843/12645
  18. Khudov, H., Glukhov, S., Maistrenko, O., Fedorov, A., Andriienko, A. Koplik, O. (2020). The Method of ADS-B Receiver Systems Synchronization using MLAT Technologies in the Course of Radar Control of Air Environment. International Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering Research, 8 (5), 2002–2008. doi: https://doi.org/10.30534/ijeter/2020/87852020
  19. Belyaev, Yu. K., Bogatyrev, V. A., Bolotin, V. V. et. al. (1985). Nadezhnost' tekhnicheskih sistem. Moscow: Radio i svyaz', 608.
  20. Sadchikov, P. I., Prihod'ko, Yu. G. (1983). Metody otsenki nadezhnosti i obespecheniya ustoychivosti funktsionirovaniya programm. Moscow: Znanie, 102.
  21. Golinkevich, T. A. (1985). Prikladnaya teoriya nadezhnosti. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola, 168.
  22. Shcherba, A. A. (2014). The evolution of reconnaissance-fire technology on the basis of network-centric principles of management. Herald of Khmelnytskyi national university. Technical sciences, 4, 109–112.
  23. Maistrenko, O., Khoma, V., Karavanov, O., Stetsiv, S., Shcherba, A. (2021). Devising a procedure for justifying the choice of reconnaissance-firing systems. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1 (3 (109)), 60–71. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.224324

Downloads

Published

2021-04-30

How to Cite

Maistrenko, O., Karavanov, O., Riman, O. ., Kurban, V., Shcherba, A., Volkov, I., Kravets, T., & Semiv, G. (2021). Devising a procedure for substantiating the type and volume of redundant structural-functional elements of reconnaissance-firing systems. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2(3 (110), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.229031

Issue

Section

Control processes