Structural and microscopy characterization of an alternative low-energy binder containing Ca(OH)2 as an alkaline activator

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.233182

Keywords:

low-energy binder, alkaline activator, metakaolin, pozzolanic reaction, diffractogram hump, amorphous phase, polarised optical microscope

Abstract

The development of potential alternative binders to Portland cement is still becoming a global challenge in housing and infrastructure aspects. That is because cement and concrete become the major materials needed in building constructions. The Ordinary Portland cement can form a solid and hard mass when mixed with water with a certain ratio. This is due to the formation of ettringite and calcium silicate hydrate (CSH) phases that contribute to the strength of the hydrated products about 33–53 MPa. However, the manufacturing temperature of Portland cement can reach up to 1,500 °C in producing clinker. In order to lower the energy consumption and production cost, scientists were trying to utilize pozzolanic materials.

The research of pozzolanic materials as alkali-activated cement, such as soil cement or geopolymer cement, is also still conducted. Hence, a better understanding of pozzolanic reaction and its hydration products is needed. In this work, the hydration products of low-energy binders composed of Ca(OH)2-SiO2 and Ca(OH)2-metakaolin-gypsum mixtures were studied.

The hydrated products of 41 wt. % Ca(OH)2 – 41 wt. % metakaolin – 18 wt. % gypsum mixtures followed by water immersion curing at 50 °C for 28 days undergone a pozzolanic reaction. XRD characterization showed that the hydrated product is mainly composed of ettringite (60.0 %) and crystalline-CSH (23.4 %). The diffractograms obtained have shown a specific hump indicating the presence of amorphous phases besides the crystalline. To confirm the presence of the non-crystalline or amorphous phases of the hydrated products, a polarizing optical microscope (OM) using a crossed Nicols method was used. The characterization of the phases is the novelty of the present research. The ettringite, crystalline CSH and the amorphous phases act as a strong binder that consequently contribute to its average maximum compressive strength of 22.17 MPa.

Supporting Agency

  • This research is self and partially funded by the Faculty of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Bandung Institute of Technology, Bandung, Indonesia

Author Biographies

Aditianto Ramelan, Bandung Institute of Technology

Doctor of Engineering

Department of Materials Science and Engineering

Adhi Setyo Nugroho, Bandung Institute of Technology

Bachelor of Engineering

Department of Materials Science and Engineering

Teti Indriati, Bandung Institute of Technology

Master of Engineering

Department of Mining Engineering

Riska Rachmantyo, Bandung Institute of Technology

Master of Engineering

Department of Materials Science and Engineering

References

  1. Bye, G. C. (1999). Portland cement: composition, production and properties. Thomas Telford Ltd. doi: https://doi.org/10.1680/pccpap.27664
  2. Taylor, H. F. W. (1997). Cement chemistry. Thomas Telford Ltd. doi: https://doi.org/10.1680/cc.25929
  3. Flatt, R. J., Roussel, N., Cheeseman, C. R. (2012). Concrete: An eco material that needs to be improved. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 32 (11), 2787–2798. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2011.11.012
  4. Rado, P. (1988). An introduction to the technology of pottery. Institute of Ceramics by Pergamon Press, 266.
  5. Shi, C., Jiménez, A. F., Palomo, A. (2011). New cements for the 21st century: The pursuit of an alternative to Portland cement. Cement and Concrete Research, 41 (7), 750–763. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.03.016
  6. Žemlička, M., Kuzielova, E., Kuliffayova, M., Tkacz, J., Palou, M. T. (2015). Study of hydration products in the model systems metakaolin–lime and metakaolin–lime–gypsum. Ceramics – Silikáty, 59 (4), 283–291. Available at: https://www.ceramics-silikaty.cz/2015/pdf/2015_04_283.pdf
  7. Morsy, M. S., Alsayed, S. H., Salloum, Y. A. (2012). Development of eco-friendly binder using metakaolin-fly ash–lime-anhydrous gypsum. Construction and Building Materials, 35, 772–777. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.04.142
  8. Bhanumathidas, N., Kalidas, N. (2004). Dual role of gypsum: Set retarder and strength accelerator. Indian Concrete Journal, 78 (3), 170–173. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/287679112_Dual_role_of_gypsum_Set_retarder_and_strength_accelerator
  9. Nežerka, V., Slížková, Z., Tesárek, P., Plachý, T., Frankeová, D., Petráňová, V. (2014). Comprehensive study on mechanical properties of lime-based pastes with additions of metakaolin and brick dust. Cement and Concrete Research, 64, 17–29. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2014.06.006
  10. Siegesmund, S., Snethlage, R. (Eds.) (2011). Stone in architecture: properties, durability. Springer, 552. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14475-2
  11. Khatib, J. M., Baalbaki, O., ElKordi, A. A. (2018). Metakaolin. Waste and Supplementary Cementitious Materials in Concrete, 493–511. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-102156-9.00015-8
  12. Rahhal, V., Talero, R. (2014). Very early age detection of ettringite from pozzolan origin. Construction and Building Materials, 53, 674–679. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.10.082
  13. Kovalchuk, O., Gelevera, O., Ivanychko, V. (2019). Studying the influence of metakaolin on self-healing processes in the contact-zone structure of concretes based on the alkali-activated Portland cement. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5 (6 (101)), 33–40. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2019.181501
  14. Alonso, S., Palomo, A. (2001). Alkaline activation of metakaolin and calcium hydroxide mixtures: influence of temperature, activator concentration and solids ratio. Materials Letters, 47 (1-2), 55–62. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-577x(00)00212-3
  15. French, W. J. (1991). Concrete petrography: a review. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 24 (1), 17–48. doi: https://doi.org/10.1144/gsl.qjeg.1991.024.01.03
  16. Reedy, C. L. (2006). Review of Digital Image Analysis of Petrographic Thin Sections in Conservation Research. Journal of the American Institute for Conservation, 45 (2), 127–146. doi: https://doi.org/10.1179/019713606806112531
  17. James, T., Malachi, A., Gadzama, E. W., Anametemok, A. (2011). Effect of curing methods on the compressive strength of concrete. Nigerian Journal of Technology, 30 (3), 14–20. Available at: https://www.ajol.info/index.php/njt/article/view/123538
  18. Narmluk, M., Nawa, T. (2014). Effect of Curing Temperature on Pozzolanic Reaction of Fly Ash in Blended Cement Paste. International Journal of Chemical Engineering and Applications, 5 (1), 31–35. doi: https://doi.org/10.7763/ijcea.2014.v5.346
  19. Jumate, E., Manea, D. L. (2011). X-ray diffraction study of hydration processes in the Portland cement. Journal of Applied Engineering Science, 1 (1), 79–86. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/file.PostFileLoader.html?id=54c14753d2fd6445588b45b8&assetKey=AS%3A273678338592769%401442261409008
  20. Šavija, B., Luković, M. (2016). Carbonation of cement paste: Understanding, challenges, and opportunities. Construction and Building Materials, 117, 285–301. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.138
  21. Matschei, T., Lothenbach, B., Glasser, F. P. (2007). The role of calcium carbonate in cement hydration. Cement and Concrete Research, 37 (4), 551–558. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.10.013
  22. Bergold, S. T., Goetz-Neunhoeffer, F., Neubauer, J. (2013). Quantitative analysis of C–S–H in hydrating alite pastes by in-situ XRD. Cement and Concrete Research, 53, 119–126. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2013.06.001
  23. Bhagath Singh, G. V. P., Subramaniam, K. V. L. (2016). Quantitative XRD Analysis of Binary Blends of Siliceous Fly Ash and Hydrated Cement. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 28 (8), 04016042. doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0001554
  24. Hunnicutt, W. A. (2013). Characterization of calcium-silicate-hydrate and calcium-alumino-silicate-hydrate. Urbana, Illinois. Available at: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/16750866.pdf
  25. Fabbri, B., Gualtieri, S., Shoval, S. (2014). The presence of calcite in archeological ceramics. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 34 (7), 1899–1911. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2014.01.007
  26. Lukschová, Š., Přikryl, R., Pertold, Z. (2009). Petrographic identification of alkali–silica reactive aggregates in concrete from 20th century bridges. Construction and Building Materials, 23 (2), 734–741. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.02.020
  27. Herwani, Pane, I., Imran, I., Budiono, B. (2018). Compressive Strength of Fly ash-based Geopolymer Concrete with a Variable of Sodium Hydroxide (NaOH) Solution Molarity. MATEC Web of Conferences, 147, 01004. doi: https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201814701004
  28. Ivashchyshyn, H., Sanytsky, M., Kropyvnytska, T., Rusyn, B. (2019). Study of low-emission multi-component cements with a high content of supplementary cementitious materials. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 4 (6 (100)), 39–47. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2019.175472
  29. Krivenko, P., Petropavlovskyi, O., Kovalchuk, O., Lapovska, S., Pasko, A. (2018). Design of the composition of alkali activated portland cement using mineral additives of technogenic origin. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 4 (6 (94)), 6–15. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2018.140324
  30. Bhagath Singh, G. V. P., Subramaniam, K. V. L. (2016). Quantitative XRD study of amorphous phase in alkali activated low calcium siliceous fly ash. Construction and Building Materials, 124, 139–147. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.07.081
  31. Suherman, P. M., van Riessen, A., O’Connor, B., Li, D., Bolton, D., Fairhurst, H. (2002). Determination of amorphous phase levels in Portland cement clinker. Powder Diffraction, 17 (3), 178–185. doi: https://doi.org/10.1154/1.1471518

Downloads

Published

2021-06-18

How to Cite

Ramelan, A., Nugroho, A. S., Indriati, T., & Rachmantyo, R. (2021). Structural and microscopy characterization of an alternative low-energy binder containing Ca(OH)2 as an alkaline activator . Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 3(6 (111), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.233182

Issue

Section

Technology organic and inorganic substances