Forecasting the durability of public transport bus bodies depending on operating conditions

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.238171

Keywords:

bus operation, durability modeling, body frame, body corrosion, fatigue strength

Abstract

This paper addresses the issue related to forecasting the durability indicators of public transport buses under operational conditions. It has been established that when buses are operated to transport passengers the bus bodies wear at different intensities. During operation, the strength of the body frame weakens under the influence of corrosion in combination with sites of fatigue destruction. As it was established, the intensity of corrosion of the bus body depends on the number of residents in the city where the bus is operated. The earlier established dependences were taken into consideration; the current study has identified two conditional variants of corrosion evolution based on the number of inhabitants: up to 1 million and exceeding 1 million. The expediency of repairs and their impact on the bus passive safety has been analyzed. It was found that the elements of the body frame, without external characteristic damage, no longer meet the specified conditions of strength as a result of sign-alternating loads and during long-term operation.

Determining the durability of the bus body was made possible through the construction of a mathematical model. The model’s adequacy was confirmed by road tests of the bus. The devised model describes the movement of the bus over a road surface with different micro profiles, with different corrosion penetration, different loading by passengers, and bus speeds.

It was established that the reason for the evolution of structural corrosion is the influence of salt mixtures preventing the icing of roads, as well as ignoring the washing of buses after such trips.

It is recommended to use new software for the in-depth study into this issue addressing the combination of various factors of destruction: cyclic loads at variable bus speeds and the corrosion progress. The study results could make it possible to predict a life cycle of the body frame under factors that correspond to actual operating conditions.

Author Biographies

Dmytro Ruban, JSС Cherkasy Bus

PhD, Associate Professor

Lubomir Kraynyk, Lviv Polytechnic National University

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor

Department of Automotive Engineering

Hanna Ruban, Cherkasy State Business College

Lecturer

Department of Fundamental Disciplines

Andrii Sosyk, Zaporizhzhia Polytechnic National University

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Automobiles

Andriy Shcherbyna, Zaporizhzhia Polytechnic National University

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Automobiles

Olga Dudarenko, Zaporizhzhia Polytechnic National University

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Automobiles

Alexander Artyukh, Zaporizhzhia Polytechnic National University

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Automobiles

References

  1. ECE Regulation No. 66, Agreement, E/ECE/TRANS/505, Rev. 1/Add. 65/Rev.1 (2006). United Nations.
  2. Scania Omni City Omni Link Body Workshop Manual (2004). Body workshop. Scania CV AB 2004. Sweden.
  3. Kraynyk, L., Ruban, D., Ruban, H. (2017). Estimation of change of physical and mechanical properties elements to framework of basket of bus in the process of exploitation. Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Transport, 1, 47–52. Available at: https://vmt.vntu.edu.ua/index.php/vmt/article/view/70
  4. Corrosion Cost and Preventive Strategies in the United States. FHWA-RD-01-156. Available at: https://trid.trb.org/view/707382
  5. Kyröläinen, A., Vilpas, M., Hänninen, H. (2000). Use of Stainless Steels in Bus Coach Structures. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 9 (6), 669–677. doi: https://doi.org/10.1361/105994900770345548
  6. Ruban, D. P., Krajnik, L. V., Rouban, A. Y. (2018). Estimation of influence of introduction ofgrounds of subzero entrance „low-entry” in structure of bearing basket on resource descriptions of bus in exploitation. Automobile Transport, 43, 31–35. doi: https://doi.org/10.30977/at.2219-8342.2018.43.0.31
  7. D’souza, C., Paquet, V., Lenker, J., Steinfeld, E., Bareria, P. (2012). Low-floor bus design preferences of walking aid users during simulated boarding and alighting. Work, 41, 4951–4956. doi: https://doi.org/10.3233/wor-2012-0791-4951
  8. D’Souza, C., Zhu, X. (2014). Ambulation Aid Use and User Performance for Transit Vehicle Interior Design. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 58 (1), 510–514. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931214581106
  9. Ruban, D. P., Krainyk, L. V. (2017). Otsinka rehlamentovanoho terminu ekspluatatsiyi avtobusiv z umov vidpovidnosti normatyvam pasyvnoi bezpeky vnaslidok koroziyi ta vtomnoi mitsnosti kuzova. Systemy I Środki transportu samochodowego. Seria: Transport – Rzeszów, 10, 95–100.
  10. Fakić, B., Burić, A., Horoz, E. (2018). Science of Metals Through Lens of Microscope. New Technologies, Development and Application, 113–120. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90893-9_13
  11. Ruban, D., Kraynyk, L. (2018). Methodology of predictive estimation of lifetime buses. Suchasni tekhnolohiyi v mashynobuduvanni ta transporti, 2 (11), 117–121.
  12. Salgado, R. M., Ohishi, T., Ballini, R. (2010). A short-term bus load forecasting system. 2010 10th International Conference on Hybrid Intelligent Systems. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/his.2010.5600075
  13. Ruban, D. P. (2020). Mathematical Model of Forecasting Durability of Bus Bodies and Checking it for Adequacy. Visnyk of Vinnytsia Politechnical Institute, 3 (150), 81–89. doi: https://doi.org/10.31649/1997-9266-2020-150-3-81-89
  14. Georgiou, G., Badarlis, A., Natsiavas, S. (2008). Modelling and ride dynamics of a flexible multi-body model of an urban bus. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part K: Journal of Multi-Body Dynamics, 222 (2), 143–154. doi: https://doi.org/10.1243/14644193jmbd130
  15. Pohmurskiy, V. I. (1985). Korrozionnaya ustalost' metallov. Moscow: Metallurgiya, 207.
  16. Hülser, P., Krüger, U. A., Beck, F. (1996). The cathodic corrosion of aluminium during the electrodeposition of paint: Electrochemical measurements. Corrosion Science, 38 (1), 47–57. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-938x(96)00101-1
  17. Besuden, D. L. (2020). School Bus Corrosion. Automotive International, Inc. Available at: http://www.valugard.net/index.php/school-bus-corrosion-2/
  18. Vertin, T. (2011). Protecting Your Vehicles from Corrosion. Mass Transit. Available at: https://www.masstransitmag.com/home/article/10454360/protecting-your-vehicles-from-corrosion
  19. Nazari, M. H., Bergner, D., Shi, X. (2015). Manual of for the Prevention of Corrosion on Vehicles and Equipment used by Transportation Agencies for Snow and Ice Control. Minnesota Department of Transportation Research Services & Library.
  20. Corrosion Protection ‒ Proof That It Matters (2018). Daimler Trucks North America LLC. Available at: https://thomasbuiltbuses.com/bus-advisor/articles/corrosion-protection-proof-that-it-matters/
  21. Dassault Systemes Matlab Corporation. Available at: https://www.matlab.com/
  22. Ruban, D. (2020). Research of tension change in the elements of a bus body frame during operation. Automobile Transport, 46, 27–32. doi: https://doi.org/10.30977/at.2219-8342.2020.46.0.27
  23. Ruban, D. P., Ruban, H. Ya. (2016). Research on Determination of Terms of Exploitation of Busses. Visnyk of Vinnytsia Politechnical Institute, 5 (128), 105–109.
  24. Cagri, I., Izzet, C., Anil, Y., Namik, K., Karoseri, O. (2010). Fatigue Life Prediction of a Bus Body Structure Using CAE Tools. Conference: Fisita 2010 World Automotive Congress. Vol. 1 Budapest, 319–329.
  25. Verros, G., Natsiavas, S. (2002). Ride Dynamics of Nonlinear Vehicle Models Using Component Mode Synthesis. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, 124 (3), 427–434. doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1473828
  26. Papalukopoulos, C., Natsiavas, S. (2006). Dynamics of Large Scale Mechanical Models Using Multilevel Substructuring. Journal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics, 2 (1), 40–51. doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2389043
  27. Yu, F., Guan, X., Zhang, J. (2002). Modeling and Performance Analysis for a City Low-floor Bus Based on a Non-linear Rigid-elastic Coupling Multi-body Model. SAE Technical Paper Series. doi: https://doi.org/10.4271/2002-01-3094
  28. Krishnamoorthy, M., Sam Paul Albert, M. (2014). Durability Analysis of a Vehicle by Virtual Test Model (VTM). Ashok Leyland Ltd. Available at: https://www.techbriefs.com/component/content/article/tb/pub/techbriefs/test-and-measurement/19542
  29. White, M. (2010). Analyzing Durability. Available at: https://altairuniversity.com/2791-analyzing-durability/
  30. Suresh, B. A., Klinikowski, D. J., Gilmore, B. J. (1993). Comparison of Vehicle Durability Testing Methods. SAE Technical Paper Series. doi: https://doi.org/10.4271/932967
  31. Ramakrishnan, S. (2019). Proving ground durability simulations. Degree project in mechanical engineering, second cycle, 30 credits. Stockholm. Available at: http://www.diva-portal.se/smash/get/diva2:1352854/FULLTEXT01.pdf
  32. Bus and Coach Durability and Reliability Testing. Available at: https://www.millbrook.co.uk/services/vehicle-and-component/vehicle-durability-testing/bus-and-coach-durability-and-reliability-testing/
  33. Silaev, A. A. (1972). Spektral'naya teoriya podressorivaniya transportnyh mashin. Moscow: Mashinostroenie, 192.
  34. Pevzner, Ya. M., Tihonov, A. A. (1963). Rezul'taty obsledovaniya mikroprofiley osnovnyh tipov avtomobil'nyh dorog. Moscow: Trudy NAMI, 17–39.
  35. Burian, M. V., Bodnar, M. F. (2016). Otsinka plavnosti rukhu avtobusa metodom modeliuvannia v systemi matlab/simulink. Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu "Lvivska politekhnika". Dynamika, mitsnist ta proektuvannia mashyn i pryladiv, 838, 115–120.
  36. Kelman, I. I. (2001). Osnovy zabezpechennia systemnoi efektyvnosti ekspluatatsiynykh vlastyvostei avtobusiv. Lviv, 200.
  37. Dodds, C. J., Robson, J. D. (1973). The description of road surface roughness. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 31 (2), 175–183. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-460x(73)80373-6
  38. Brovtsyn, Y. N. (2015). Modeling of surface microprofile of fields and roads. Tekhnologii i tekhnicheskie sredstva mekhanizirovannogo proizvodstva produktsii rastenievodstva i zhivotnovodstva. Sbornik nauchnyh trudov. IAEP, 86, 59–68.
  39. Rayher, V. L. (1968). Gipoteza spektral'nogo summirovaniya i ee primenenie k opredeleniyu ustalostnoy dolgovechnosti pri deystvii sluchaynyh nagruzok. Probl. nadezhnosti v stroitel'noy mekhanike. Vil'nyus, 263–267.
  40. Adler, Yu. P., Markova, E. V., Granovskiy, Yu. V. (1976). Planirovanie eksperimenta pri poiske optimal'nyh usloviy. Moscow: Izd-vo «Nauka», 280.

Downloads

Published

2021-08-31

How to Cite

Ruban, D., Kraynyk, L., Ruban, H., Sosyk, A., Shcherbyna, A., Dudarenko, O., & Artyukh, A. (2021). Forecasting the durability of public transport bus bodies depending on operating conditions . Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 4(1(112), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.238171

Issue

Section

Engineering technological systems