Analysis of the policy of operation activity of an enterprise with product reservation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2022.252667Keywords:
operative planning, policy of operation activity, random demand, risks, product reservationAbstract
This paper examines the process of operative planning of the production of an industrial company under conditions of random fluctuations in current demand. It is shown that under these conditions there are losses, the size of which depends on the adopted policy of operation activity. The policy of operation activity is understood as the rule of making decisions on current production volumes based on information about incoming orders, probable volumes of future demand, and possible losses due to the deviation of capacity load from the normative one.
In the paper, it is proposed to assess the effectiveness of each policy of operation activity using the indicator of the limit average economic effect per unit of time for an infinite number of periods. An original approach to assessing the effectiveness of the policy of operation activity with product reservation was developed. It was shown that when using this policy, there is an effect of product "overstock" on the chains of successive periods. It was proposed to select the initial reserve so that the probability of completion of the reservation chain for a given number of periods should be close to unity. Such an approach creates an opportunity to determine the expected economic effect on the chains of reservation of various product types and, as a result, to assess the policy effectiveness in general.
An assessment of the effectiveness of the policy with reservation in the form of the dependence of the policy effectiveness indicator on the values of cost indicators was obtained. Comparison of this assessment with a similar assessment of the effectiveness of the policy of fulfilling incoming orders allowed finding a condition under which the policy with reservation is more profitable. It involves ensuring that the magnitude of losses per unit of production associated with the product stock storage does not exceed half the sum of the magnitude of losses per unit of production due to downtime and excess capacity load.
References
- Potrashkova, L. V. (2013). Optymizatsiyne modeliuvannia vyrobnychoho potentsialu pidpryiemstva v rozrizi operatyvnoho, taktychnoho ta stratehichnoho rivniv. Modeli upravlinnia v rynkoviy ekonomitsi, 16, 115–126.
- Zaruba, V. Ya., Parfentenko, I. A. (2018). Modeli pohodzhuvannia vyrobnychykh resursiv pidpryiemstva z potochnym popytom na produktsiu. Information economy: the stages of development, management methods, models. Bratyslava-Kharkiv, 469–481. Available at: http://repository.kpi.kharkov.ua/handle/KhPI-Press/36761
- ISO 31000:2018. Risk management – Guidelines. Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/65694.html
- Menon, S. A., Muchnick, M., Butler, C., Pizur, T. (2019). Critical Challenges in Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Implementation. International Journal of Business and Management, 14 (7), 54. doi: https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v14n7p54
- Kumar, R., Srivastava, S. K. (2014). A Framework for Improving “Sales and Operations Planning.” Metamorphosis: A Journal of Management Research, 13 (1), 16–25. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0972622520140104
- Alexander, D. (2013). S&OP and strategy: Building the bridge and making the process stick. Journal of Business Forecasting, 32, 16–19. Available at: https://1stdirectory.co.uk/_assets/files_comp/b801628e-9b64-4794-a22d-ae872981d1da.pdf
- Mula, J., Poler, R., García-Sabater, J. P., Lario, F. C. (2006). Models for production planning under uncertainty: A review. International Journal of Production Economics, 103 (1), 271–285. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.09.001
- Mirzapour Al-e-hashem, S. M. J., Baboli, A., Sazvar, Z. (2013). A stochastic aggregate production planning model in a green supply chain: Considering flexible lead times, nonlinear purchase and shortage cost functions. European Journal of Operational Research, 230 (1), 26–41. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.03.033
- Fujita, Y., Izui, K., Nishiwaki, S., Zhang, Z., Yin, Y. (2022). Production planning method for seru production systems under demand uncertainty. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 163, 107856. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107856
- Zaruba, V. Y. (2017). Optimization of production plans according to estimates of the probability of future orders. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 2, 222–232. doi: https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2017.2-21
- Mubiru, P. (2010). A Markov decision model for optimising economic production lot size under stochastic demand. ORiON, 26 (1). doi: https://doi.org/10.5784/26-1-85
- Shi, X., Shen, H., Wu, T., Cheng, T. C. E. (2014). Production planning and pricing policy in a make-to-stock system with uncertain demand subject to machine breakdowns. European Journal of Operational Research, 238 (1), 122–129. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.03.017
- Zaruba, V., Parfentenko, I. (2020). Risk Management Models in Operative Planning at an Industrial Enterprise. 2020 IEEE International Conference on Problems of Infocommunications. Science and Technology (PIC S&T). doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/picst51311.2020.9467954
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Lyudmyla Potrashkova, Viktor Zaruba, Lidiya Guryanova, Kateryna Sokol, Ihor Kuksa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.
A license agreement is a document in which the author warrants that he/she owns all copyright for the work (manuscript, article, etc.).
The authors, signing the License Agreement with TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC, have all rights to the further use of their work, provided that they link to our edition in which the work was published.
According to the terms of the License Agreement, the Publisher TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC does not take away your copyrights and receives permission from the authors to use and dissemination of the publication through the world's scientific resources (own electronic resources, scientometric databases, repositories, libraries, etc.).
In the absence of a signed License Agreement or in the absence of this agreement of identifiers allowing to identify the identity of the author, the editors have no right to work with the manuscript.
It is important to remember that there is another type of agreement between authors and publishers – when copyright is transferred from the authors to the publisher. In this case, the authors lose ownership of their work and may not use it in any way.
