Implementation of regression algorithms for oil recovery prediction

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2022.253886

Keywords:

machine learning, polynomial regression method, enhanced oil recovery, lasso regularization

Abstract

This paper presents the work of predicting oil production using machine learning methods. As a machine learning method, a multiple linear regression algorithm with polynomial properties was implemented. Regression algorithms are suitable and workable methods for predicting oil production based on a data-driven approach. The synthetic dataset was obtained using the Buckley-Leverett mathematical model, which is used to calculate hydrodynamics and determine the saturation distribution in oil production problems. Various combinations of parameters of the oil production problem were chosen, where porosity, viscosity of the oil phase and absolute permeability of the rock were taken as input parameters for machine learning. And the value of the oil recovery factor was chosen as the output parameter. More than 400 thousand synthetic data were used to test multiple regression algorithms. To estimate the quality of regression algorithms, the mean square error metrics and the coefficient of determination were used. It was found that linear regression does not cover all patterns in the data due to underfitting. Various degrees of polynomial regression were deployed and tested, and it was also found that for our synthetic data, the quadratic polynomial model trains quite well and perfectly predicts the value of the oil recovery factor. To solve the overfitting problem, L1 regularization known as the Lasso regression method was applied. For the quadratic polynomial regression model, the coefficient of determination was 0.96, which is a pretty good result for the test data. Thus, it is assumed that the data-driven machine learning methods discussed in the paper can be useful for predicting the oil recovery factor using practical data from oil fields at the stages of production

Supporting Agency

  • This research was funded by the Science Committee of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan (Grant No. AP09260564).

Author Biographies

Yerzhan Kenzhebek, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University

Master of Science

Department of Computer Science

Timur Imankulov, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University

PhD

Department of Computer Science

Darkhan Akhmed-Zaki, Astana IT University

PhD, Rector

Beimbet Daribayev, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University

PhD, Head of Department

Department of Informatics

References

  1. Krasnov, F., Glavnov, N., Sitnikov, A. (2017). A Machine Learning Approach to Enhanced Oil Recovery Prediction. Analysis of Images, Social Networks and Texts, 164–171. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73013-4_15
  2. Guo, Z., Reynolds, A. C., Zhao, H. (2017). A Physics-Based Data-Driven Model for History-Matching, Prediction and Characterization of Waterflooding Performance. Day 3 Wed, February 22, 2017. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/182660-ms
  3. Saberi, H., Esmaeilnezhad, E., Choi, H. J. (2021). Artificial Neural Network to Forecast Enhanced Oil Recovery Using Hydrolyzed Polyacrylamide in Sandstone and Carbonate Reservoirs. Polymers, 13 (16), 2606. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13162606
  4. Vo Thanh, H., Sugai, Y., Sasaki, K. (2020). Application of artificial neural network for predicting the performance of CO2 enhanced oil recovery and storage in residual oil zones. Scientific Reports, 10 (1). doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73931-2
  5. Koperna, G. J., Melzer, L. S., Kuuskraa, V. A. (2006). Recovery of Oil Resources From the Residual and Transitional Oil Zones of the Permian Basin. All Days. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/102972-ms
  6. Cheraghi, Y., Kord, S., Mashayekhizadeh, V. (2021). Application of machine learning techniques for selecting the most suitable enhanced oil recovery method; challenges and opportunities. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 205, 108761. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2021.108761
  7. Ahmadi, M. A., Soleimani, R., Lee, M., Kashiwao, T., Bahadori, A. (2015). Determination of oil well production performance using artificial neural network (ANN) linked to the particle swarm optimization (PSO) tool. Petroleum, 1 (2), 118–132. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petlm.2015.06.004
  8. Makhotin, I., Orlov, D., Koroteev, D., Burnaev, E., Karapetyan, A., Antonenko, D. (2021). Machine learning for recovery factor estimation of an oil reservoir: A tool for de-risking at a hydrocarbon asset evaluation. Petroleum. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petlm.2021.11.005
  9. Aliyuda, K., Howell, J. (2019). Machine-learning algorithm for estimating oil-recovery factor using a combination of engineering and stratigraphic dependent parameters. Interpretation, 7 (3), SE151–SE159. doi: https://doi.org/10.1190/int-2018-0211.1
  10. Erofeev, A., Orlov, D., Ryzhov, A., Koroteev, D. (2019). Prediction of Porosity and Permeability Alteration Based on Machine Learning Algorithms. Transport in Porous Media, 128 (2), 677–700. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-019-01265-3
  11. Mahmoud, A., Elkatatny, S., Chen, W., Abdulraheem, A. (2019). Estimation of Oil Recovery Factor for Water Drive Sandy Reservoirs through Applications of Artificial Intelligence. Energies, 12 (19), 3671. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/en12193671
  12. Ristanto, T., Horne, R. (2018). Machine Learning Applied to Multiphase Production Problems. Tita Ristanto. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327977359_Machine_Learning_Applied_to_Multiphase_Production_Problems
  13. Liu, Y., Horne, R. N. (2013). Interpreting Pressure and Flow Rate Data from Permanent Downhole Gauges Using Convolution-Kernel-Based Data Mining Approaches. All Days. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/165346-ms
  14. Liu, Y., Horne, R. N. (2013). Interpreting Pressure and Flow Rate Data from Permanent Downhole Gauges with Convolution-Kernel-Based Data Mining Approaches. Day 2 Tue, October 01, 2013. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/166440-ms
  15. Tian, C., Horne, R. N. (2019). Applying Machine-Learning Techniques To Interpret Flow-Rate, Pressure, and Temperature Data From Permanent Downhole Gauges. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 22 (02), 386–401. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/174034-pa
  16. Cao, Q., Banerjee, R., Gupta, S., Li, J., Zhou, W., Jeyachandra, B. (2016). Data Driven Production Forecasting Using Machine Learning. Day 2 Thu, June 02, 2016. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/180984-ms
  17. Chen, S. (2019). Application of Machine Learning Methods to Predict Well Productivity in Montney and Duvernay. University of Calgary. Available at: https://higherlogicdownload.s3.amazonaws.com/SPE/5fc0079d-67a5-4dd9-a56f-190534ef5d3d/UploadedImages/2019_04_16_ML_SPE_Presentation_Revised.pdf

Downloads

Published

2022-04-30

How to Cite

Kenzhebek, Y., Imankulov, T., Akhmed-Zaki, D. ., & Daribayev, B. (2022). Implementation of regression algorithms for oil recovery prediction . Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2(2 (116), 69–75. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2022.253886