Ensuring the economic and environmental efficiency in managing the flows of construction and demolition waste by using tools of economic and mathematical modeling





construction and demolition waste, integrated management system, potential of secondary resources


This paper argues that in the context of transformation from the linear to circular model of the economy, the issues of managing the flow of construction and demolition waste (C&DW) are becoming increasingly relevant, which is primarily due to the increase in prices for building materials, as well as resource saving and interest of stakeholders in the creation of eco-cities.

The tools and methods to manage C&DW flows have been examined in the context of simultaneous ensuring the environmental and economic efficiency of the process. It is substantiated that the expediency of implementing the C&DW flow management process exists only within the framework of the system of integrated management of waste flows from construction and demolition of real estate in compliance with logistical principles and coverage of the interests of all stakeholders of the process.

Tools, methods to forecast and plan C&DW volumes within IFMS have been proposed, which contributed to the construction of a model for forecasting the volume of C&DW formation and, therefore, determining the amount of total costs for the creation of appropriate technological capacities; the development of a model for assessing information risks in the process of logistics management of C&DW flows (based on solving the transport problem according to Kolmogorov's differentiated equations) and constructing an algorithm for its application, the introduction of which in practice will ensure the balancing of the interests of each stakeholder interested in the processing of C&DW; solving the problem of synthesis of reducing the cost of managing C&DW flows and reducing environmental pressure. In order to combine the goals of minimizing costs and minimizing environmental damage within the framework of SIWFM, a two-purpose dynamic optimization model is proposed, as well as restrictions on the possibility of its introduction and validation of this study's results. It is substantiated that the tools and methods of economic and mathematical modeling proposed in the current study could solve an important scientific and practical task to effectively manage C&DW flows

Author Biographies

Anton Shuvaiev, Zaporizhzhia National University

Postgraduate Student

Department of Industrial and Civil Engineering

Irina Arutiunian, Zaporizhzhia National University

Doctor of Technical Sciences

Department of Industrial and Civil Engineering

Victor Anin, Zaporizhzhia National University

Doctor of Economic Sciences

Department of Industrial and Civil Engineering

Artem Ichetovkin, Zaporizhzhia National University

Postgraduate Student

Department of Industrial and Civil Engineering

Serhii Sylenko, Zaporizhzhia Polytechnic National University

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Occupational Safety and the Environment


  1. De Melo, A. B., Gonçalves, A. F., Martins, I. M. (2011). Construction and demolition waste generation and management in Lisbon (Portugal). Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 55 (12), 1252–1264. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.06.010
  2. States in 2013, by material (in million tons). Available at: https://www.statista.com/statistics/504120/construction-and-demolition-waste-generation-in-the-us-by-material/
  3. Villoria Saez, P., del Río Merino, M., San-Antonio González, A., Porras-Amores, C. (2013). Best practice measures assessment for construction and demolition waste management in building constructions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 75, 52–62. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.03.009
  4. Marrero, M., Puerto, M., Rivero-Camacho, C., Freire-Guerrero, A., Solís-Guzmán, J. (2017). Assessing the economic impact and ecological footprint of construction and demolition waste during the urbanization of rural land. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 117, 160–174. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.10.020
  5. Arutiunian, I. А., Shuvaev, А. А. (2020). Environmentally-economic feasibility of integrated management of waste flowsin the construction industry. Bridges and tunnels: Theory, Research, Practice, 18, 9–17. doi: https://doi.org/10.15802/bttrp2020/217692
  6. Shuvaiev, A. (2021). Perspektyvy vykorystannia metodiv ta pryntsypiv lohistyky v systemi kompleksnoho upravlinnia potokamy vtorynnykh resursiv budivelnoi haluzi. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats ΛΌГOΣ. doi: https://doi.org/10.36074/logos-01.10.2021.v2.31
  7. Aleksanin, A. V. (2015). Formirovanie logisticheskikh struktur po obrascheniyu s otkhodami stroitel'stva. Estestvennye i tekhnicheskie nauki, 11, 623–625.
  8. Shen, L. Y., Tam, V. W. Y. (2002). Implementation of environmental management in the Hong Kong construction industry. International Journal of Project Management, 20 (7), 535–543. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0263-7863(01)00054-0
  9. Li, R. Y. M., Du, H. (2014). Sustainable Construction Waste Management in Australia: A Motivation Perspective. Construction Safety and Waste Management, 1–30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12430-8_1
  10. Chiveralls, K, Palmer, J, Zillante, G, Zuo, J, Wilson, L, Pullen, S. (2012). Reconsidering sustainable building and design: lessons from China, Germany and Australia. Adelaide. Available at: https://www.isecoeco.org/conferences/isee2012-versao3/pdf/114.pdf
  11. Park, J., Tucker, R. (2016). Overcoming barriers to the reuse of construction waste material in Australia: a review of the literature. International Journal of Construction Management, 17 (3), 228–237. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2016.1192248
  12. Gálvez-Martos, J.-L., Styles, D., Schoenberger, H., Zeschmar-Lahl, B. (2018). Construction and demolition waste best management practice in Europe. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 136, 166–178. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.04.016
  13. Gangolells, M., Casals, M., Forcada, N., Macarulla, M. (2014). Analysis of the implementation of effective waste management practices in construction projects and sites. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 93, 99–111. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.10.006
  14. Nußholz, J. L. K., Nygaard Rasmussen, F., Milios, L. (2019). Circular building materials: Carbon saving potential and the role of business model innovation and public policy. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 141, 308–316. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.036
  15. Tam, V., Lu, W. (2016). Construction Waste Management Profiles, Practices, and Performance: A Cross-Jurisdictional Analysis in Four Countries. Sustainability, 8 (2), 190. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su8020190
  16. Lu, W., Yuan, H. (2013). Investigating waste reduction potential in the upstream processes of offshore prefabrication construction. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 28, 804–811. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.048
  17. Huang, X., Xu, X. (2011). Legal regulation perspective of eco-efficiency construction waste reduction and utilization. Urban Dev. Stud., 9, 90–94.
  18. Yuan, H., Shen, L. (2011). Trend of the research on construction and demolition waste management. Waste Management, 31 (4), 670–679. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2010.10.030
  19. Wiedenhofer, D., Steinberger, J. K., Eisenmenger, N., Haas, W. (2015). Maintenance and Expansion: Modeling Material Stocks and Flows for Residential Buildings and Transportation Networks in the EU25. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 19 (4), 538–551. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12216
  20. Winstead, V. J. (2005). Methods of fault detection in stochastic delay-differential linear systems. The University of Wisconsin-Madison. Available at: https://www.proquest.com/openview/8fabf6688ab3feede2cc277e3cc0dca9/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
  21. Kisielewski, P. (2016). The system of IT support for logistics in the rail transport. Archives of Transport, 40 (4), 39–50. doi: https://doi.org/10.5604/08669546.1225465
  22. Qiao, L., Liu, D., Yuan, X., Wang, Q., Ma, Q. (2020). Generation and Prediction of Construction and Demolition Waste Using Exponential Smoothing Method: A Case Study of Shandong Province, China. Sustainability, 12 (12), 5094. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125094
  23. Nema, A. K., Gupta, S. K. (1999). Optimization of regional hazardous waste management systems: an improved formulation. Waste Management, 19 (7-8), 441–451. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0956-053x(99)00241-x
  24. Hu, Y.-P., You, X.-Y., Wang, L., Liu, H.-C. (2018). An integrated approach for failure mode and effect analysis based on uncertain linguistic GRA–TOPSIS method. Soft Computing, 23 (18), 8801–8814. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3480-7




How to Cite

Shuvaiev, A., Arutiunian, I., Anin, V., Ichetovkin, A., & Sylenko, S. (2022). Ensuring the economic and environmental efficiency in managing the flows of construction and demolition waste by using tools of economic and mathematical modeling. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 3(10 (117), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2022.259537