Optimal parameters of electroheating of the implants

Authors

  • Виталий Викторович Гончаров Institute of Chemical Technology (Rubizhne) Volodymyr Dahl' East Ukrainian National University Str. Lenin, 31, Rubezhnoye, Lugansk region, Ukraine, 93009, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4861-6210

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2014.26044

Keywords:

implantation, implant, method for recovering one-dimensional dependencies, catalyst, electroheating, surface temperature

Abstract

The metal foil carriers for the catalysts with internal electroheating were studied in the paper. The samples were synthesized by implanting aluminum ions into a stainless foil and a subsequent impregnation with palladium. An important characteristic for the catalysts is the process temperature. That is why, in this research, the implant surface temperature as a determining factor of a heterogeneous catalytic process was chosen as the objective function. Studying the effect of the electric flux power, air flow rate and synthesis on the sample temperature was carried out using the method for recovering one-dimensional dependencies. As a result of the modeling, the optimal ranges of varying the process parameters were determined. It was shown that the electric flux power and the synthesis had a significant influence on the surface temperature, and the effect of the air flow rate was negligible. The obtained results allow effectively controlling electricoheating of the steel samples and can be applied in the construction of heat-exchange and catalytic elements with internal heating.

Author Biography

Виталий Викторович Гончаров, Institute of Chemical Technology (Rubizhne) Volodymyr Dahl' East Ukrainian National University Str. Lenin, 31, Rubezhnoye, Lugansk region, Ukraine, 93009

Ph.D., Associate Professor

Department of Physics and Technical Mechanics

References

  1. Giornelli, T., Lofberg, A., Guillou L. (2007). Catalytic wall reactor Catalytic coatings of stainless steel by VOx/TiO2 and Co/SiO2 catalysts. Catalysis Today, 128, 201–207. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2007.07.023
  2. Forzatti, P. (2003). Status and perspectives of catalytic combustion for gas turbines. Catalysis Today, 83 (1-4), 3–18. doi: 10.1016/S0920-5861(03)00211-6
  3. Song, С. (2008). Recent advances in catalysis for hydrogen production and fuel processing for fuel cells. Top Catal, 49 (1-2), 1–3. doi: 10.1007/S11244-008-9069-0
  4. Vaneman, G. L. (1991). Comparison of metal foil and ceramic monolith automotive catalytic converters. Catalysis and automotive pollution control II, 71, 537–555. doi: 10.1016/S0167-2991(08)63000-1
  5. McCarty, J. G., Gusman, M., Lowe D. M. (1999). Stability of supported metal and supported metal oxide combustion catalysts. Catalysis Today, 47 (1-4), 5–17. doi: 10.1016/S0920-5861(98)00279-X
  6. Rodrigues, A. С. С. (2007). Metallic mixed oxides (Pt, Mn or Cr) as catalysts for the gas-phase toluene oxidation. Catalysis Communications, 8 (8), 1227–1231. doi: 10.1016/j.catcom.2006.11.013
  7. Liotta, L. F., Carlo, G. Di, Pantaleo, G. (2005). Co3O4/CeO2 and Co3O4/CeO2–ZrO2 composite catalysts for methane combustion: Correlation between morphology reduction properties and catalytic activity. Catalysis Communications, 6 (5), 329–336. doi: 10.1016/j.catcom.2005.02.006
  8. Campagnoli, E., Tavares, A., Fabbrini L. (2005). Effect of preparation method on activity and stability of LaMnO3 and LaCoO3 catalysts for the flameless combustion of methane. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 55 (2), 133–139. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2004.07.010
  9. Yoshida, H., Nakajima, T., Yazawa Y. (2007). Support effect on methane combustion over palladium catalysts. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 71 (1-2), 70–79. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2006.08.010
  10. Zamaro, J. M., Ulla, M. A., Miro E. E. (2008). SM5 growth on a FeCrAl steel support. Coating characteristics upon the catalytic behavior in the NOx SCR. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 115 (1-2), 113–122. doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2007.11.048
  11. Vlasenko, V. M. (2010). Ekologicheskii kataliz. Kyiv, Ukraine: Naukova dumka, 237.
  12. Zhang, Q., Nakaya, M., Ootani T. (2007). Simulation and experimental analysis on the development of a co-axial cylindrical methane steam reformer using an electrically heated alumite catalyst. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 32 (16), 3870–3879. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.05.031
  13. Horikoshi, S., Osawa, A., Sakamoto S. (2013). Control of microwave-generated hot spots. Part IV. Control of hot spots on a heterogeneous microwave-absorber catalyst surface by a hybrid internal/external heating method. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 69, 52–56. doi: 10.1016/j.cep.2013.02.003
  14. Lofberg, A., Giornelli, T., Paul S. (2011). Catalytic coatings for structured supports and reactors: VOx/TiO2 catalyst coated on stainless steel in the oxidative dehydrogenation of propane. Applied Catalysis A: General, 391 (1-2), 43–51. doi: 10.1016/j.apcata.2010.09.002
  15. Truyen, D., Courty, M., Alphonse P. (2006). Catalytic coatings on stainless steel prepared by sol-gel route. Thin Solid Films, 495 (1-2), 257–261. doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2005.08.200
  16. Honcharov, V. V., Zazhigalov V. A. (2012). Sintez i kharakteristika kompozita c Ni i Al, implantirovannymi v nerzhaveiushchuiu stal. Butlerovskiye soobshcheniia, 32 (13), 68–74.
  17. Davidenko, A. M., Kats, M. D. (2004). Novyie metody izucheniia deistvuiushchikh proizvodstv i ikh vozmozhnostie. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6 (12), 189–193.
  18. Zraychenko-Polozentsev, A., Koval, O., Domin, D. (2011). Otsinka potentsiinykh rezerviv vyrobnytstva pri viplavtsi sintetichnogo chavunu. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 1 (1), 7–15.

Published

2014-08-13

How to Cite

Гончаров, В. В. (2014). Optimal parameters of electroheating of the implants. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 4(5(70), 65–69. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2014.26044