Devising a method for managing the configuration of products within an eco-logistics system project

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2022.261956

Keywords:

eco-logistics system, project life cycle, product content, project product configuration

Abstract

This paper considers the need to transform logistics systems into eco-logistics ones in order to achieve environmental goals of sustainable development. It was determined that one of the ways to reduce the eco-destructive impact of eco-logistics systems on the environment is the use of project management methodology tools and making changes to the project life cycle by including ecologically oriented phases. The products obtained during the life cycle of an eco-logistics system project have been identified and the links between the products of individual phases of the project have been established.

The object of this study is the method of managing the configuration of products of the eco-logistics system project, which includes three stages: product parameter specification, product clustering, and structuring of the project’s product clusters. A description of each stage is provided.

The specification of product parameters is to create descriptive frame models of products that contain the parameters necessary to characterize the product phase of the project, which are reflected in the content of the project’s products. Product clustering involves the creation of information models of product clusters that contain information about the set of products of the project phases that have close parameter values. Structuring clusters of project products leads to the creation of a network of clusters between which connections are formed, which makes it possible to build a product configuration.

Experimental calculations confirming the adequacy of the application of the proposed method of managing the configuration of products of the eco-logistics system project are presented. As a result, a network of clusters of project products has been created, using which makes it possible to synthesize product chains that would have maximum value in terms of complying with eco-logistics rules and could minimize the negative impact on the environment.

Author Biographies

Sergey Rudenko, Odessa National Maritime University

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Rector

Tetiana Kovtun, Odessa National Maritime University

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor

Department of Logistics Systems and Projects Management

Victoriya Smrkovska, Odessa National Maritime University

PhD

Department of Logistics Systems and Projects Management

References

  1. Van Buren, N., Demmers, M., van der Heijden, R., Witlox, F. (2016). Towards a Circular Economy: The Role of Dutch Logistics Industries and Governments. Sustainability, 8 (7), 647. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su8070647
  2. Kovtun, T. (2020). A model of closed circuits forming in a logistics system with feedback. Innovative Technologies and Scientific Solutions for Industries, 4 (14), 113–120. doi: https://doi.org/10.30837/itssi.2020.14.113
  3. Potting, J., Hekkert, M., Worrell, E., Hanemaaijer, A. (2017). Circular Economy: Measuring Innovation in the Product Chain. Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, 46. Available at: https://5dok.net/document/rz3djj7y-circular-economy-measuring-innovation-in-product-chains.html
  4. Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., Ulgiati, S. (2016). A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 114, 11–32. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007
  5. Rudenko, S., Gogunskii, V., Kovtun, T., Smrkovska, V. (2021). Determining the influence of transformation changes in the life cycle on the assessment of effectiveness of an ecologistic system project. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1 (3 (109)), 6–14. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.225262
  6. Rudenko, S., Kovtun, T. (2021). Creation of the Eco-Logistic system project products configuration in the conditions of uncertainty. Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop IT Project Management (ITPM 2021). Vol. 2851. CEUR Workshop Proceedings. Slavsko, 195–205. Available at: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2851/paper18.pdf
  7. MIL–HDBK–61. Military Handbook. Configuration Management Guidance. Available at: https://www.product-lifecycle-management.com/download/MIL-HDBK-61B%20(Draft).pdf
  8. Practice Standard for Project Configuration Management (2007). Project Management Institute, 53. Available at: http://nioec.ir/Training/%D9%85%D8%AF%DB%8C%D8%B1%DB%8C%D8%AA%20%D9%BE%D8%B1%D9%88%DA%98%D9%87/PMI/PMI_Standard/PS_ProjectConfiguration.pdf
  9. Morozov, V. V., Rudnitskiy, S. I. (2013). Conceptual model of the configuration management process in projects. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1 (10 (61)), 187–193. Available at: http://journals.uran.ua/eejet/article/view/6766/6016
  10. Sydorchuk, A., Ratushnyi, R., Shcherbachenko, A., Sivakovskaya, E. (2016). Concordance of configurations of systems-products and their projects. Upravlinnia rozvytkom skladnykh system, 25, 58–65. Available at: https://repositary.knuba.edu.ua/bitstream/handle/987654321/5205/9.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  11. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBoK) – Six Edition. PMI, 574.
  12. Kononenko, I. V., Kolesnik, M. E., Lobach, E. V. (2014). Protsess mnogokriterial'noy optimizatsii soderzhaniya proekta pri ispol'zovanii metodologii PMBoK. Visnyk NTU «KhPI». Seriya «Stratehichne upravlinnia, upravlinnia portfeliamy, prohramamy ta proiektamy», 2 (1045), 11–17. Available at: http://repository.kpi.kharkov.ua/bitstream/KhPI-Press/4973/1/vestnik_HPI_2014_2_Kononenko_Protsess.pdf
  13. Atkinson, R., Crawford, L., Ward, S. (2006). Fundamental uncertainties in projects and the scope of project management. International Journal of Project Management, 24 (8), 687–698. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.09.011
  14. Kononenko, I. V., Kolesnik, M. E. (2013). Model and method of multicriteria project scope optimization with fuzzy input data. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1 (10 (61)), 9–13. Available at: http://journals.uran.ua/eejet/article/view/6949/5961
  15. Cheng, M.-Y., Tran, D.-H., Wu, Y.-W. (2014). Using a fuzzy clustering chaotic-based differential evolution with serial method to solve resource-constrained project scheduling problems. Automation in Construction, 37, 88–97. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2013.10.002
  16. Hassanzadeh, F., Collan, M., Modarres, M. (2012). A Practical Approach to R&D Portfolio Selection Using the Fuzzy Pay-Off Method. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 20 (4), 615–622. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/tfuzz.2011.2180380
  17. Kovtun, T. (2020). Frame models of the ecological system project. Transport Development, 1 (6), 17–29. doi: https://doi.org/10.33082/td.2020.1-6.02

Downloads

Published

2022-08-31

How to Cite

Rudenko, S., Kovtun, T., & Smrkovska, V. (2022). Devising a method for managing the configuration of products within an eco-logistics system project. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 4(3(118), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2022.261956

Issue

Section

Control processes