A model of decoy system based on dynamic attributes for cybercrime investigation





decoys, cybercrime, security, analysis, deception, blockchain, Honeypot, Deception, network, cybersecurity


The object of research are decoys with dynamic attributes. This paper discusses the impact of decoys involving blockchain technologies on the state of information security of the organization and the process of researching cybercrime. This is important because most cybercrimes are detected after the attacker gains access to sensitive data. Through systematic analysis of the literature focused on assessing the capabilities of decoy and blockchain technologies, this work identifies the main advantages of decoys that utilize blockchain technology. To assess the effectiveness of attacker detection and cybercrime analysis, controlled experiments were conducted using a blockchain-based decoy system that we developed aimed at determining network performance.

As part of the study reported here, a technique is proposed to detect cybercrime using decoys based on blockchain technology. This technique is based on the fact that the attributes of the system change dynamically. Such a technique has made it possible to obtain a system model that solves the task of detecting decoys by intruders. In addition, the developed scheme reduces the load in contrast to the conventional fixed solution.

The results indicate that the response time of services is significantly reduced in the environment of decoys with dynamic attributes. For example, Nginx's response time in a static host is twice as high as dynamic, and an Apache dynamic server can still respond to an intruder's attack even if a static server fails. Therefore, the results reported in the article give grounds to assert the possibility of using the solution in the infrastructure of information systems at the public and private levels

Author Biographies

Sviatoslav Vasylyshyn, Lviv Polytechnic National University

Postgraduate Student

Department of Information Security

Vitalii Susukailo, Lviv Polytechnic National University

Postgraduate Student

Department of Information Security

Ivan Opirskyy, Lviv Polytechnic National University

Doctor of Technical Sciences

Department of Information Security

Yevhenii Kurii, Lviv Polytechnic National University

Postgraduate Student

Department of Information Security

Ivan Tyshyk, Lviv Polytechnic National University


Department of Information Security


  1. Anirudh, M., Thileeban, S. A., Nallathambi, D. J. (2017). Use of honeypots for mitigating DoS attacks targeted on IoT networks. 2017 International Conference on Computer, Communication and Signal Processing (ICCCSP). doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/icccsp.2017.7944057
  2. Sardana, A., Joshi, R. (2009). An auto-responsive honeypot architecture for dynamic resource allocation and QoS adaptation in DDoS attacked networks. Computer Communications, 32 (12), 1384–1399. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2009.03.005
  3. Kuwatly, L., Sraj, M., Al Masri, Z., Artail, H. (2004). A dynamic honeypot design for intrusion detection. The IEEE/ACS International Conference OnPervasive Services, 2004. ICPS 2004. Proceedings. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/perser.2004.1356776
  4. Artail, H., Safa, H., Sraj, M., Kuwatly, I., Al-Masri, Z. (2006). A hybrid honeypot framework for improving intrusion detection systems in protecting organizational networks. Computers & Security, 25 (4), 274–288. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2006.02.009
  5. Saeedi, A., Nassiri, M., Khotanlou, H. (2012). A dynamic approach for honeypot management. International Journal of Information, Security and Systems Management, 1 (2), 104–109.
  6. Fan, W., Fernández, D., Du, Z. (2015). Adaptive and Flexible Virtual Honeynet. Mobile, Secure, and Programmable Networking, 1–17. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25744-0_1
  7. Hecker, C., Hay, B. (2013). Automated Honeynet Deployment for Dynamic Network Environment. 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/hicss.2013.110
  8. Fraunholz, D., Zimmermann, M., Schotten, H. D. (2017). An adaptive honeypot configuration, deployment and maintenance strategy. 2017 19th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT). doi: https://doi.org/10.23919/icact.2017.7890056
  9. Fan, W., Fernández, D., Du, Z. (2017). Versatile virtual honeynet management framework. IET Information Security, 11 (1), 38–45. doi: https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-ifs.2015.0256
  10. Casino, F., Dasaklis, T. K., Patsakis, C. (2019). A systematic literature review of blockchain-based applications: Current status, classification and open issues. Telematics and Informatics, 36, 55–81. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.11.006
  11. Hepp, T., Wortner, P., Schönhals, A., Gipp, B. (2018). Securing Physical Assets on the Blockchain. Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Cryptocurrencies and Blockchains for Distributed Systems. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3211933.3211944
  12. Cruz, J. P., Kaji, Y., Yanai, N. (2018). RBAC-SC: Role-Based Access Control Using Smart Contract. IEEE Access, 6, 12240–12251. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2018.2812844
  13. Swan, M. (2015). Blockchain Thinking: The Brain as a Decentralized Autonomous Corporation [Commentary]. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 34 (4), 41–52. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/mts.2015.2494358
  14. Schütte, J., Fridgen, G., Prinz, W., Rose, T., Urbach, N., Hoeren, T. et al. (2018). Blockchain and Smart Contracts. Technologies, Research Issues and Applications. Fraunhofer. Available at: https://www.iuk.fraunhofer.de/content/dam/iuk/en/docs/Fraunhofer-Paper_Blockchain-and-Smart-Contracts_EN.pdf
  15. Susukailo, V., Vasylyshyn, S., Opirskyy, I., Buriachok, V. (2021). Cybercrimes investigation via honeypots in cloud environments. CEUR Workshop, 2923, 91–96. Available at: https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2923/paper10.pdf
  16. Opirskyy, I., Vasylyshyn, S., Piskozub, A. (2020). Analysis of the use of software baits (honeypots) as a means of ensuring information security. Cybersecurity: Education, Science, Technique, 2 (10), 88–97. doi: https://doi.org/10.28925/2663-4023.2020.10.8897
  17. Dudykevych, V., Prokopyshyn, I., Chekurin, V., Opirskyy, I., Lakh, Y., Kret, T. et al. (2019). A multicriterial analysis of the efficiency of conservative information security systems. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 3 (9 (99)), 6–13. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2019.166349
  18. Banafa, A. (2016). How to Secure the Internet of Things (IoT) with Blockchain. Datafloq. Available at: https://datafloq.com/read/securing-internet-of-things-iot-with-blockchain/
  19. Pulling fraud out of the shadows. Global Economic Crime and Fraud Survey 2018. PwC. Available at: https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/news-room/docs/pwc-global-economic-crime-survey-report.pdf
  20. McLaughlin, M.-D., Gogan, J. (2018). Challenges and best practices in information security management. MIS Quarterly Executive, 17 (3), 237–262.
  21. Joshi, R. C., Sardana, A. (2011). Honeypots. CRC Press, 340. doi: https://doi.org/10.1201/b10738
  22. Zhuravchak, D. (2021). Ransomware spread prevention system using python, auditd and linux. Cybersecurity: Education, Science, Technique, 4 (12), 108–116. doi: https://doi.org/10.28925/2663-4023.2021.12.108116
  23. Gandotra, V., Singhal, A., Bedi, P. (2012). Threat-Oriented Security Framework: A Proactive Approach in Threat Management. Procedia Technology, 4, 487–494. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2012.05.078
  24. Onaolapo, J., Mariconti, E., Stringhini, G. (2016). What Happens After You Are Pwnd. Proceedings of the 2016 Internet Measurement Conference. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/2987443.2987475
  25. Bamert, T., Decker, C., Elsen, L., Wattenhofer, R., Welten, S. (2013). Have a snack, pay with Bitcoins. IEEE P2P 2013 Proceedings. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/p2p.2013.6688717
  26. How blockchain can transform defence assets and give armed forces an advantage on the battlefield (2020). PwC. Available at: https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/aerospace-defence/pdf/blockchain-defence.pdf
  27. Beecroft, N. (2015). Emerging Risk Report – 2015. Bitcoin. Lloyds. Available at: https://assets.lloyds.com/assets/pdf-bitcoin-bitcoin-final/1/pdf-bitcoin-bitcoin-final.pdf
  28. Bentov, I., Lee, C., Mizrahi, A., Rosenfeld, M. (2014). Paper 2014/452. Proof of Activity: Extending Bitcoin’s Proof of Work via Proof of Stake. Cryptology ePrint Archive. Available at: https://eprint.iacr.org/2014/452
  29. BGP hijacking. Wikipedia. Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=BGP_hijacking&oldid=820773357
  30. Bissias, G., Ozisik, A. P., Levine, B. N., Liberatore, M. (2014). Sybil-Resistant Mixing for Bitcoin. Proceedings of the 13th Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/2665943.2665955
  31. Bitcoin Block Reward Halving Countdown. Available at: https://www.bitcoinblockhalf.com/
  32. Grafiki blokcheyna. Available at: https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/charts
  33. Bitcoin Energy Consumption Index. Available at: https://digiconomist.net/bitcoin-energy-consumption
  34. Cryptocurrency statistics. Available at: https://bitinfocharts.com/
  35. How much of BIP 62 ("Dealing with malleability") has been implemented? Available at: https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/35904/how-much-of-bip-62-dealing-with-malleability-has-been-implemented
  36. Blockchain and Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT). Available at: https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/blockchain-and-distributed-ledger-technology-dlt/
  37. Bonneau, J. Why buy when you can rent? Bribery attacks on Bitcoin-style consensus. Available at: https://jbonneau.com/doc/BFGKN14-bitcoin_bribery.pdf
  38. Bos, J. W., Halderman, J. A., Heninger, N., Moore, J., Naehrig, M., Wustrow, E. (2013). Paper 2013/734. Elliptic Curve Cryptography in Practice. Cryptology ePrint Archive. Available at: https://eprint.iacr.org/2013/734
  39. Boverman, A. (2011). Timejacking & Bitcoin. Culubas. Available at: http://culubas.blogspot.com/2011/05/timejacking-bitcoin_802.html
  40. Bruce, J. D. (2014). The Mini-Blockchain Scheme. Available at: https://www.weusecoins.com/assets/pdf/library/The%20Mini-Blockchain%20Scheme.pdf
  41. Buldas, A., Kroonmaa, A., Laanoja, R. (2013). Paper 2013/834. Keyless Signatures' Infrastructure: How to Build Global Distributed Hash-Trees. Cryptology ePrint Archive. Available at: https://eprint.iacr.org/2013/834
  42. Buterin, V. (2014). A next-generation smart contract and decentralized application platform. White Paper, 3 (37).
  43. Blockchain's Once-Feared 51% Attack Is Now Becoming Regular. Available at: https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2018/06/08/blockchains-once-feared-51-attack-is-now-becoming-regular/
  44. Castro, M., Liskov, B. (1999). Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance. Proceedings of the Third Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation. New Orleans. Available at: https://pmg.csail.mit.edu/papers/osdi99.pdf
  45. Chen, T., Li, X., Luo, X., Zhang, X. (2017). Under-optimized smart contracts devour your money. 2017 IEEE 24th International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER). doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/saner.2017.7884650
A model of decoy system based on dynamic attributes for cybercrime dolidzhennya




How to Cite

Vasylyshyn, S., Susukailo, V., Opirskyy, I., Kurii, Y., & Tyshyk, I. (2023). A model of decoy system based on dynamic attributes for cybercrime investigation. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1(9 (121), 6–20. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2023.273363



Information and controlling system