Improving the efficiency of mode automation using synchrophasor measurements to identify stability disturbance

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2023.275515

Keywords:

mutual voltage angle, emergency control system, synchrophasor measurements, electric power systems stability, WAMS

Abstract

The paper presents new approaches and principles for identifying the conditions of stability disturbance based on detecting dangerous disturbances in the early stages using information about changes in regime parameters and their Rate of Change. As a mode parameter, the mutual voltage angle between the controlled 500 kV substation and its Rate of Change was selected in the study. It is suggested to take the values of the mentioned parameters from the Wide Area Measurements System (WAMS). The relevance of the research is due to the need to improve the efficiency and eliminate the drawbacks of existing revealing devices of regime automatics, which will reduce the number of accidents due to disturbances of the power system stability. The proposed principle of predicting stability violation is based on using the provision of Lyapunov’s stability theory, according to which the assessment of stability is carried out by the total system energy consisting of kinetic and potential. In contrast to the existing principles of detecting stability violation, where the exit from the stability area is determined by the main parameter (potential energy), the prediction principle allows evaluating stability by its rate of change (kinetic energy), which provides the early detection of stability disturbance.

Calculations were performed on modeling power surges in the North-South interconnection of the Kazakhstan Unified Energy System in the «DigSILENT Power Factory» software on the model, which was verified by real perturbations in the power system according to the WAMS data. The calculations confirmed the effectiveness of the proposed principles and the possibility of using WAMS data for detecting emergency power surges on transit power networks in the initial stage

Author Biographies

Alexandr Gunin, Almaty University of Power Engineering and Telecommunications named after Gumarbek Daukeyev

PhD Student

Department of Electric Power Systems

Karmel Tokhtibakiev, Almaty University of Power Engineering and Telecommunications named after Gumarbek Daukeyev

Candidate of Technical Sciences, Senior Lecturer

Department of Electric Power Systems

Almaz Saukhimov, Almaty University of Power Engineering and Telecommunications named after Gumarbek Daukeyev

PhD, Provost

Anur Bektimirov, Almaty University of Power Engineering and Telecommunications named after Gumarbek Daukeyev

PhD Student

Eugene Didorenko, Kazakhstan Electricity Grid Operating Company (KEGOC)

Chief Dispatcher

References

  1. Ministry of Energy of the Republic of Kazakhstan (December 2014) Order No. 210 of the Minister of Energy of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated December 18, 2014 on approval of the Electric Power Grid Rules. Available at: https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/V1400010899/download.
  2. Ministry of Energy of the Republic of Kazakhstan (December 2022г) Draft Order "On Approval of the Smart Grid Concept in Kazakhstan. Available at: https://www.gov.kz/uploads/2023/2/13/bac54cd77302c01aab2a81c14ad5fc56_original.2132142.docx
  3. Joint Stock Company "Kazakhstan Electricity Grid Operating Company" (2019). Annual report 2019. National Electrical Grid. Available at: https://ar2019.kegoc.kz/pdf/AR2019_KEGOC_rus_site.pdf.
  4. IEEE Standard C37.118.1™-2011 for Synchrophasor Measurements for Power Systems. Available at: https://standards.ieee.org/ieee/C37.118.1/4902/.
  5. Phadke A. G. et al. (2008). The Wide World of Wide-area Measurement. IEEE Power and Energy Magazine, 6 (5), 52-65. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/MPE.2008.927476.
  6. Novosel, D., & Vu, K. (2006). Benefits of PMU technology for various applications. Zbornik radova sedmog simpozija o sustavu vođenja EES-a HK CIGRE, Cavtat, 5(8.11), Available at: https://www.ieee.hr/_download/repository/Pozivno_predavanja_Novosel_Vu_Cigre_06.pdf.
  7. Chakrabortty, A., Chow, J. H., & Salazar, A. (2011). A Measurement-Based Framework for Dynamic Equivalencing of Large Power Systems Using Wide-Area Phasor Measurements. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2(1), 68–81. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2010.2093586.
  8. A.G. Phadke, J.S. Thorp. (2017). Synchronized Phasor Measurements and Their Applications. Second Edition. Springer International Publishing AG 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50584-8.
  9. De La Ree, J., Centeno, V., Thorp, J. S., & Phadke, A. G. (2010). Synchronized Phasor Measurement Applications in Power Systems. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 1(1), 20–27. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2010.2044815.
  10. А.R. Sobbouhi, A. Vahedi. Sobbouhi, A. R., & Vahedi, A. (2021). Transient stability prediction of power system; a review on methods, classification and considerations. Electric Power Systems Research, 190, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2020.106853.
  11. Joshi, P.M., Verma, H.K. (2021). Synchrophasor measurement applications and optimal PMU placement: A review. Electric Power Systems Research, 199, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2021.107428.
  12. Wei, S., Yang, M., Qi, J., Wang, J., Ma, S., & Han, X. (2017). Model-free MLE estimation for online rotor angle stability assessment with PMU data. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 33(3), 2463-2476, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2017.2761598.
  13. Liu, L., Li, Y., Cao, Y., Liu, F., Wang, W., & Zuo, J. (2019). Transient rotor angle stability prediction based on deep belief network and long short-term memory network. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 52(4), 176-181, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.08.175.
  14. Sobbouhi, A. R., & Vahedi, A. (2020). Online synchronous generator out-of-step prediction by ellipse fitting on acceleration power–speed deviation curve. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 119, doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2020.105965.
  15. Robak, S., Machowski, J., Skwarski, M. M., & Smolarczyk, A. (2021). Transient stability improvement by generator tripping and real-time instability prediction based on local measurements. IEEE Access, 9, 130519-130528, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3111967.
  16. James, J. Q., Hill, D. J., Lam, A. Y., Gu, J., & Li, V. O. (2017). Intelligent time-adaptive transient stability assessment system. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 33(1), 1049-1058, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2017.2707501.
  17. Yang, H., Zhang, W., Shi, F., Xie, J., & Ju, W. (2019). PMU-based model-free method for transient instability prediction and emergency generator-shedding control. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 105, 381-393, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2018.08.031.
  18. Gupta, A., Gurrala, G., & Sastry, P. S. (2018). An online power system stability monitoring system using convolutional neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 34(2), 864-872, https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2018.2872505.
  19. Saner, C. B., Kesici, M., Mahdi, M., Yaslan, Y., & Genc, V. I. (2019, April). Wide area measurement-based transient stability prediction using long short-term memory networks. In 2019 7th International Istanbul Smart Grids and Cities Congress and Fair (ICSG) (pp. 159-163). IEEE, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/SGCF.2019.8782391.
  20. Shi, Z., Yao, W., Zeng, L., Wen, J., Fang, J., Ai, X., & Wen, J. (2020). Convolutional neural network-based power system transient stability assessment and instability mode prediction. Applied Energy, 263, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114586.
  21. Azman, S. K., Isbeih, Y. J., El Moursi, M. S., & Elbassioni, K. (2020). A unified online deep learning prediction model for small signal and transient stability. IEEE transactions on power systems, 35(6), 4585-4598. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2020.2999102.
  22. Venikov V.A., Vasin V.P. (1972). A Static stability analysis of complex electrical systems and frequency methods. Tr SibNIIE [Proceedings of Siberian Research Institute of Energy], 21, 3-8.
  23. Kundur P. and Malik Om P. (2022). Power System Stability and Control, 2nd. Edition, McGraw-Hill: New York., Available at: https://www.accessengineeringlibrary.com/content/book/9781260473544
  24. Machowski, J., Lubosny, Z., Bialek, J. W., & Bumby, J. R. (2020). Power system dynamics: stability and control. John Wiley & Sons, Available at: https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Power+System+Dynamics%3A+Stability+and+Control%2C+3rd+Edition-p-9781119526360.
  25. Tokhitibakiev, K., & Saukhimov, A. (2015). Capacity control of transport lines of Kazakhstan national electric grid in real time using synchronized phasor data measurements. Technical Electrodynamics–Кiev, (4), 62-65. Available at: http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/134102.
  26. Merekenov M., Tokhtibakiyev K., Bektimirov A., Nigmatullin R. (2020). The advancing assessment of power system stability using smart grid technology. IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering, 994(1), 012014. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/994/1/012014.
  27. Tokhtibakiev K., Saukhimov A., Bektimirov A., Merekenov M., Shubekova K. and Murat A. (2017). Control of steady-state stability of 500 kV transmission lines in the National Electrical Networks of Kazakhstan using PMUs data. 2017 52nd International Universities Power Engineering Conference (UPEC). doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/UPEC.2017.8231859 .
  28. Bektimirov, A.T., Saukhimov, A.A., Tokhtibakiev, K.K., Didorenko, E.V. (2020). Increasing the reliability of the Kazakhstan grid functioning by implementing the WACS automation. AUPET Bulletin, 4 (51), 16-26, doi: https://doi.org/10.51775/1999-9801_2020_51_4_16.
Improving the efficiency of mode automation using synchrophasor measurements to identify stability disturbance

Downloads

Published

2023-04-29

How to Cite

Gunin, A., Tokhtibakiev, K., Saukhimov, A., Bektimirov, A., & Didorenko, E. (2023). Improving the efficiency of mode automation using synchrophasor measurements to identify stability disturbance. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2(8 (122), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2023.275515

Issue

Section

Energy-saving technologies and equipment