Optimization of the electrostatic coal adsorption process for sea-salt production from seawater

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2023.279099

Keywords:

electrostatic coal adsorbent, sea-salt impurities, sulfate adsorption, lime juice, acid-wash

Abstract

High sulfate content in seawater forms sulfate salts, which become impurities in sea salts.  This study investigates the influence of lime juice in the adsorption of sulfate ions in seawater using commercial activated carbon. A full factorial experimental design was employed to optimize the level factors of activated carbon type, adsorbent dosage, and concentration of lime juice in response to the percentage reduction in sulfate concentration. Activated carbon (GCB) and acid-washed activated carbon (GCA) were two types of coconut shells granular activated carbon used for the experiment without further modification. The main effect and interaction effects were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and p-values to define the influence of variables affecting sulfate ions adsorption. The adsorption of sulfate ions in seawater was affected by the interaction between the activated carbon type and the dosage, and the concentration of lime juice. The lime juice factor significantly enhanced the performance of activated carbon to adsorb the sulfate ions in seawater, and the factor's contribution was 58.2 %. The optimum sulfate ions reduction from seawater was attained at levels of factors activated carbon GCB, the dosage of 50mg, and the concentration of lime juice 50 µl. The interaction between lime juice and activated carbon pores are electrostatic. The impurities are attracted by the revealed polarity of the activated carbon pores. High electronegativity of lime juice acid pulls the negatively charged ions of the impurities. The more economical activated carbon, GCB, which performed better in sulfate ion adsorption, provides an alternative for reducing sea salt impurities. Hence, GCB can directly be mixed with the seawater to produce high quality sea-salt. Therefore, this study is suitable to improve sea salt product quality that processed with activated carbon

Supporting Agency

  • We would like to thank the support of the FESEM facility (FEI Quanta FEG 650) at Central Laboratory of Life Science-Brawijaya University (LSIH-UB)

Author Biographies

Yurida Ekawati, Universitas Ma Chung; Brawijaya University

Master of Engineering, Senior Lecturer, Doctoral Candidate

Department of Industrial Engineering

Department of Mechanical Engineering

Oyong Novareza, Brawijaya University

Doctor of Engineering, Associate Professor

Department of Industrial Engineering

Putu Hadi Setyarini, Brawijaya University

Doctor of Engineering, Associate Professor

Department of Mechanical Engineering

Willy Satrio Nugroho, Brawijaya University

Doctor of Engineering

Department of Industrial Engineering

I Nyoman Gede Wardana, Brawijaya University

Doctor of Engineering, Professor

Department of Mechanical Engineering

References

  1. Dasgupta, P. K., Liu, Y., Dyke, J. V. (2008). Iodine Nutrition: Iodine Content of Iodized Salt in the United States. Environmental Science & Technology, 42 (4), 1315–1323. doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/es0719071
  2. Knowles, J. M., Garrett, G. S., Gorstein, J., Kupka, R., Situma, R., Yadav, K. et al. (2017). Household Coverage with Adequately Iodized Salt Varies Greatly between Countries and by Residence Type and Socioeconomic Status within Countries: Results from 10 National Coverage Surveys. The Journal of Nutrition, 147 (5), 1004S-1014S. doi: https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.116.242586
  3. Sedivy, V. M. (2013). Environmental balance of salt production speaks in favour of solar saltworks. Global NEST Journal, 11 (1), 41–48. doi: https://doi.org/10.30955/gnj.000567
  4. Byrne, R. H., Mackenzie, F. T., Duxbury, A. C. (2023). Seawater. Encyclopedia Britannica. Available at: https://www.britannica.com/science/seawater
  5. Keene, W. C., Pszenny, A. A. P., Galloway, J. N., Hawley, M. E. (1986). Sea-salt corrections and interpretation of constituent ratios in marine precipitation. Journal of Geophysical Research, 91 (D6), 6647. doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/jd091id06p06647
  6. Runtti, H., Tuomikoski, S., Kangas, T., Kuokkanen, T., Rämö, J., Lassi, U. (2016). Sulphate Removal from Water by Carbon Residue from Biomass Gasification: Effect of Chemical Modification Methods on Sulphate Removal Efficiency. BioResources, 11 (2). doi: https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.11.2.3136-3152
  7. Hong, S., Cannon, F. S., Hou, P., Byrne, T., Nieto-Delgado, C. (2017). Adsorptive removal of sulfate from acid mine drainage by polypyrrole modified activated carbons: Effects of polypyrrole deposition protocols and activated carbon source. Chemosphere, 184, 429–437. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.06.019
  8. Zhu, M., Yin, X., Chen, W., Yi, Z., Tian, H. (2018). Removal of sulphate from mine waters by electrocoagulation/rice straw activated carbon adsorption coupling in a batch system: optimization of process via response surface methodology. Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination, 9 (2), 163–172. doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/wrd.2018.054
  9. Rahmati, M., Yeganeh, G., Esmaeili, H. (2019). Sulfate Ion Removal From Water Using Activated Carbon Powder Prepared by Ziziphus Spina-Christi Lotus Leaf. Acta Chimica Slovenica, 66 (4), 888–898. doi: https://doi.org/10.17344/acsi.2019.5093
  10. Wadmare, V. B., Gadhe, K. S., Joshi, M. M. (2019). Studies on physical and chemical composition of Broccoli (Brassica oleracea L.). Int. J. Chem. Stud., 7 (2), 825–828. Available at: https://www.chemijournal.com/archives/2019/vol7issue2/PartO/7-1-654-563.pdf
  11. Rangel, C. N., Carvalho, L. M. J. de, Fonseca, R. B. F., Soares, A. G., Jesus, E. O. de. (2011). Nutritional value of organic acid lime juice (Citrus latifolia T.), cv. Tahiti. Food Science and Technology (Campinas), 31 (4), 918–922. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/s0101-20612011000400014
  12. A review of “Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers” Douglas C. Montgomery, George C. Runger, 1994 New York, Chichester, John Wiley and Sons ISBN 0 471 01021 9. (1994). European Journal of Engineering Education, 19 (3), 383–383. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03043799408928333
  13. Özbay, N., Yargıç, A. Ş., Yarbay-Şahin, R. Z., Önal, E. (2013). Full Factorial Experimental Design Analysis of Reactive Dye Removal by Carbon Adsorption. Journal of Chemistry, 2013, 1–13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/234904
  14. Koehlert, K. (2017). Activated carbon: Fundamentals and new applications. Chem. Eng. (United States), 124 (7), 32–40.
  15. Liu, S. X., Chen, X., Chen, X. Y., Liu, Z. F., Wang, H. L. (2007). Activated carbon with excellent chromium(VI) adsorption performance prepared by acid–base surface modification. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 141 (1), 315–319. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.07.006
  16. Ilomuanya, M., Nashiru, B., Ifudu, N., Igwilo, C. (2017). Effect of pore size and morphology of activated charcoal prepared from midribs of Elaeis guineensis on adsorption of poisons using metronidazole and Escherichia coli O157:H7 as a case study. Journal of Microscopy and Ultrastructure, 5 (1), 32. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmau.2016.05.001
  17. Boehm, H. P. (2002). Surface oxides on carbon and their analysis: a critical assessment. Carbon, 40 (2), 145–149. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0008-6223(01)00165-8
  18. Shafeeyan, M. S., Daud, W. M. A. W., Houshmand, A., Shamiri, A. (2010). A review on surface modification of activated carbon for carbon dioxide adsorption. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 89 (2), 143–151. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2010.07.006
  19. Montes-Morán, M. A., Suárez, D., Menéndez, J. A., Fuente, E. (2004). On the nature of basic sites on carbon surfaces: an overview. Carbon, 42 (7), 1219–1225. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2004.01.023
  20. Johnson, J. S., Westmoreland, C. G., Sweeton, F. H., Kraus, K. A., Hagaman, E. W., Eatherly, W. P., Child, H. R. (1986). Modification of cation-exchange properties of activated carbon by treatment with nitric acid. Journal of Chromatography A, 354, 231–248. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9673(01)87025-4
  21. Leon y Leon, C. A., Solar, J. M., Calemma, V., Radovic, L. R. (1992). Evidence for the protonation of basal plane sites on carbon. Carbon, 30 (5), 797–811. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6223(92)90164-r
  22. Arrigo, R., Hävecker, M., Wrabetz, S., Blume, R., Lerch, M., McGregor, J. et al. (2010). Tuning the Acid/Base Properties of Nanocarbons by Functionalization via Amination. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 132 (28), 9616–9630. doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/ja910169v
  23. Fujimura, Y., Iino, M. (2008). The surface tension of water under high magnetic fields. Journal of Applied Physics, 103 (12), 124903. doi: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2940128
  24. Patel, C. R. P., Tripathi, P., Vishwakarma, A. K., Talat, M., Soni, P. K., Yadav, T. P., Srivastava, O. N. (2018). Enhanced hydrogen generation by water electrolysis employing carbon nano-structure composites. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 43 (6), 3180–3189. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.12.142
  25. Alfarra, A., Frackowiak, E., Béguin, F. (2004). The HSAB concept as a means to interpret the adsorption of metal ions onto activated carbons. Applied Surface Science, 228 (1-4), 84–92. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2003.12.033
  26. Yakout, S. M., Salem, N. A., Mostafa, A. A., Abdeltawab, A. A. (2018). Relation between biochar physicochemical characteristics on the adsorption of fluoride, nitrite, and nitrate anions from aqueous solution. Particulate Science and Technology, 37 (1), 118–122. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02726351.2017.1352633
  27. Purnami, Hamidi, N., Sasongko, M. N., Widhiyanuriyawan, D., Wardana, I. N. G. (2020). Strengthening external magnetic fields with activated carbon graphene for increasing hydrogen production in water electrolysis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 45 (38), 19370–19380. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.05.148
  28. Nieto-Delgado, C., Rangel-Mendez, J. R. (2011). Production of activated carbon from organic by-products from the alcoholic beverage industry: Surface area and hardness optimization by using the response surface methodology. Industrial Crops and Products, 34 (3), 1528–1537. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2011.05.014
  29. Piai, L., Dykstra, J. E., Adishakti, M. G., Blokland, M., Langenhoff, A. A. M., van der Wal, A. (2019). Diffusion of hydrophilic organic micropollutants in granular activated carbon with different pore sizes. Water Research, 162, 518–527. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.06.012
  30. Satrio, N. W., Winarto, Sugiono, Wardana, I. N. G. (2020). The role of turmeric and bicnat on hydrogen production in porous tofu waste suspension electrolysis. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 12 (7), 2417–2429. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00803-0
  31. Li, L., Quinlivan, P. A., Knappe, D. R. U. (2002). Effects of activated carbon surface chemistry and pore structure on the adsorption of organic contaminants from aqueous solution. Carbon, 40 (12), 2085–2100. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0008-6223(02)00069-6
  32. Dougherty, D. A. (2012). The Cation−π Interaction. Accounts of Chemical Research, 46 (4), 885–893. doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/ar300265y
Optimization of the electrostatic coal adsorption process for sea-salt production from seawater

Downloads

Published

2023-06-30

How to Cite

Ekawati, Y., Novareza, O., Setyarini, P. H., Nugroho, W. S., & Wardana, I. N. G. (2023). Optimization of the electrostatic coal adsorption process for sea-salt production from seawater. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 3(6 (123), 22–31. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2023.279099

Issue

Section

Technology organic and inorganic substances