Identification of influence of digital twin technologies on production systems: a return on investment-based approach

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2023.283876

Keywords:

digital twin, barcode technology, radiofrequency identification, agent-based simulation, financial evaluation

Abstract

The object of this study is the impact of different digital twin solutions on the performance of job-shop manufacturing systems, while economic aspects are also taken into consideration. This paper proposes an approach to analyze the impact of different identification systems on the efficiency and ROI of digital twin deployment in production systems. In order to achieve this aim, let’s analyze the investment and operation cost of different Internet of Things technologies. The next phase of the research work was the definition of performance parameters, which makes it possible to analyze the impact of different digital twin solutions on the productivity of the job-shop manufacturing system. It is possible to choose four financial indicators to analyze the economic impact of digital twin solution on job-shop manufacturing: return on investment, compound annual growth rate, internal rate of return and net present value. Our approach is based on a novel agent-based simulation model using AnyLogic simulation tool. From the results of this productivity analyses, the model computes the financial indicators, which describe the expected financial impact of the investment and operation cost. It is compared the impact of barcodes and radiofrequency identification technologies on the financial and technological impact of the job-shop manufacturing environment. The numerical analysis of a job-shop manufacturing system shows, that the radiofrequency identification-based digital twin solution has 9.2 % higher return on investment, 53 % higher net present value and 1.6 % higher compound annual growth rate. The model can be easily converted to analyze other types of manufacturing systems, which can lead to increased efficiency of digital twin solutions

Author Biographies

Kristof Banyai, University of Miskolc

Bachelor Student in Mechanical Engineering

Laszlo Kovacs, University of Miskolc

Prof. Dr., Head of Department

Department of Information Technology

References

  1. Digital twin market by enterprise, application, industry and geography - global forecast to 2027. MarketsandMarkets. Available at: https://www.reportlinker.com/p05092748/Digital-Twin-Market-by-End-User-And-Geography-Forecast-to.html
  2. Fuller, A., Fan, Z., Day, C., Barlow, C. (2020). Digital Twin: Enabling Technologies, Challenges and Open Research. IEEE Access, 8, 108952–108971. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.2998358
  3. Madni, A., Madni, C., Lucero, S. (2019). Leveraging Digital Twin Technology in Model-Based Systems Engineering. Systems, 7 (1), 7. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/systems7010007
  4. Kritzinger, W., Karner, M., Traar, G., Henjes, J., Sihn, W. (2018). Digital Twin in manufacturing: A categorical literature review and classification. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 51 (11), 1016–1022. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.474
  5. Urbas, U., Hrga, T., Povh, J., Vukašinović, N. (2022). Novel alignment method for optical 3D gear metrology of spur gears with a plain borehole. Measurement, 192, 110839. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2022.110839
  6. Schuh, G., Bergweiler, G., Chougule, M. V., Fiedler, F. (2021). Effects of Digital Twin Simulation Modelling on a Flexible and Fixtureless Production Concept in Automotive Body Shops. Procedia CIRP, 104, 768–773. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2021.11.129
  7. Udugama, I., Kelton, W., Bayer, C. (2023). Digital twins in food processing: A conceptual approach to developing multi-layer digital models. Digital Chemical Engineering, 7, 100087. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dche.2023.100087
  8. Purcell, W., Neubauer, T. (2023). Digital Twins in Agriculture: A State-of-the-art review. Smart Agricultural Technology, 3, 100094. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2022.100094
  9. Manocha, A., Afaq, Y., Bhatia, M. (2023). Digital Twin-assisted Blockchain-inspired irregular event analysis for eldercare. Knowledge-Based Systems, 260, 110138. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2022.110138
  10. Zuhr, P., Rissmann, L., Meißner, S. (2022). Framework for planning and implementation of Digital Process Twins in the field of internal logistics. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 55 (10), 2221–2227. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.10.038
  11. Xie, X., Lu, Q., Parlikad, A. K., Schooling, J. M. (2020). Digital Twin Enabled Asset Anomaly Detection for Building Facility Management. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 53 (3), 380–385. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.11.061
  12. Wong, J., Hoong, P., Teo, E., Lin, A. (2022). Digital Twin: A Conceptualization of the Task-Technology Fit for Individual Users in the Building Maintenance Sector. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1101 (9), 092041. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1101/9/092041
  13. Kumar, S. M., Al Mahmoud, M. A. H., Al Yahyaee, N. (2022). Gap to Potential Identification through An Online Process Digital Twin. Day 3 Wed, November 02, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/211130-ms
  14. Lai, W., Zhang, H., Jiang, D., Wang, Y., Wang, R., Zhu, J. et al. (2022). Digital Twin and Big Data Technologies Benefit Oilfield Management. Day 3 Wed, November 02, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/211116-ms
  15. Aslanyan, A., Popov, A., Zhdanov, I., Pakhomov, E., Gulyaev, D., Farakhova, R. et al. (2022). Multiscenario Development Planning by Means of the Digital Twin of the Petroleum Field. Day 1 Wed, March 16, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/208970-ms
  16. Westcott, B. J., Hag-Elsafi, O., Mosaferchi, G., Alampalli, S. (2021). Lifting load restrictions on the NYS Fort Plain Bridge: A case study in SHM and the internet of things. 10th International Conference on Structural Health Monitoring of Intelligent Infrastructure: Transferring Research into Practice. Porto, 1135–1139.
  17. Skobelev, P., Tabachinskiy, A., Simonova, E., Lee, T.-R., Zhilyaev, A., Laryukhin, V. (2021). Digital twin of rice as a decision-making service for precise farming, based on environmental datasets from the fields. 2021 International Conference on Information Technology and Nanotechnology (ITNT). doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/itnt52450.2021.9649038
  18. Eppinger, T., Longwell, G., Mas, P., Goodheart, K., Badiali, U., Aglave, R. (2021). Increase food production efficiency using the executable Digital Twin (xDT). Chemical Engineering Transactions, 87, 37–42. doi: https://doi.org/10.3303/CET2187007
  19. Behnke, J. (2020). Digital Transformation's Impact on Smart Manufacturing. 2020 International Symposium on Semiconductor Manufacturing (ISSM). doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/issm51728.2020.9377506
  20. Venkateswaran, N. (2020). Industry 4.0 solutions - A pathway to use smart technologies / build smart factories. International Journal of Management (IJM), 11 (2), 132–140.
  21. Park, S., Lee, S., Park, S., Park, S. (2019). AI-Based Physical and Virtual Platform with 5-Layered Architecture for Sustainable Smart Energy City Development. Sustainability, 11 (16), 4479. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11164479
  22. Caldarelli, G., Arcaute, E., Barthelemy, M., Batty, M., Gershenson, C., Helbing, D. et al. (2023). The role of complexity for digital twins of cities. Nature Computational Science, 3 (5), 374–381. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43588-023-00431-4
  23. Bányai, K., Kovács, L. (2023). Impact of digital twin technology on production systems. In Hungarian: Digitális iker technológia hatása a gyártórendszerekre. Production Systems and Information Engineering, 11 (2), 13–32.
  24. Jia, W., Wang, W., Zhang, Z. (2022). From simple digital twin to complex digital twin Part I: A novel modeling method for multi-scale and multi-scenario digital twin. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 53, 101706. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2022.101706
  25. Types of databases. Available at: https://www.javatpoint.com/types-of-databases
  26. What is Application Server? Available at: https://www.educba.com/what-is-application-server/
  27. What Are Application Controls? Definition, Examples & Best Practices. Diligent. Available at: https://www.diligent.com/insights/grc/application-controls/
  28. The Cost of IoT Sensors Is Dropping Fast. Available at: https://www.iofficecorp.com/blog/cost-of-iot-sensors
  29. How much does IoT cost? URL: https://itrexgroup.com/blog/how-much-iot-cost-factors-challenges/
  30. How to calculate your true database costs. Available at: https://www.cockroachlabs.com/blog/true-cost-cloud-database/
  31. How Much Does Cyber Security Cost? Common Cyber Security Expenses & Fees. Available at: https://www.provendata.com/blog/cyber-security-cost-expenses-fees/
  32. Net Present Value (NPV): What It Means and Steps to Calculate It. Investopedia. Available at: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/n/npv.asp
  33. Roser, C., Ballach, D., Langer, B., Wuttke, C.-C. (2021). A Simulation-Based Performance Comparison Between Flow Shops and Job Shops. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 326–332. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92934-3_33
  34. Shukla, O. J., Soni, G., Kumar, R. (2021). SimEvents-based discrete-event simulation modelling and performance analysis for dynamic job-shop manufacturing system. International Journal of Advanced Operations Management, 13 (2), 167. doi: https://doi.org/10.1504/ijaom.2021.116137
Identification of influence of digital twin technologies on production systems: a return on investment-based approach

Downloads

Published

2023-08-31

How to Cite

Banyai, K., & Kovacs, L. (2023). Identification of influence of digital twin technologies on production systems: a return on investment-based approach. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 4(13 (124), 66–78. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2023.283876

Issue

Section

Transfer of technologies: industry, energy, nanotechnology