Rationale for choosing the airfoil of a UAV wing using a dynamic ground effect principle

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2024.314844

Keywords:

airfoil, ground effect, CFD modeling, unmanned WIG vehicle, aerodynamic quality

Abstract

Vehicles that use the principle of dynamic ground effect principle are innovative vehicles that have prospects for use as high-speed unmanned vehicles. It is known that when an aircraft moves near the ground, the phenomenon of increasing lift occurs, which allows for contactless movement at high speeds. However, the effectiveness of this ground effect depends on the airfoil shape. The object of this study is the aerodynamic processes that occur during the movement of an unmanned aerial vehicle near the ground. The influence of the effect of approaching the ground on the aerodynamic characteristics of four airfoil of different shapes has been considered: Clark YH-12, NACA-M6, USA-35B, TsAGI-721, which are used in subsonic high-speed aircraft, including unmanned aerial vehicles. The aim of the work is to evaluate the performance of these aerodynamic airfoils in near-surface operation and to determine the most promising shape for use in small unmanned WIGs. CFD modeling methods were used as a research tool. The pressure and velocity fields around the wing airfoils were determined and the influence of the distance to the ground and the angle of attack on the aerodynamic characteristics was established. It was found that the best aerodynamic quality for all airfoils is achieved at angles of attack of 4–6°. It is not recommended to use airfoils with angles of attack close to 0° as the ground may have a negative effect on lift. The USA-35B airfoil demonstrated the greatest increase in aerodynamic quality when approaching the surface, with a maximum increase of 67 %. This makes it possible to recommend USA-35B as small unmanned aerial vehicles with a dynamic ground effect principle

Author Biographies

Andrii Dreus, Oles Honchar Dnipro National University

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor

Department of Fluid Mechanics and Energy and Mass Transfer

Olena Kravets, Oles Honchar Dnipro National University

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Fluid Mechanics and Energy and Mass Transfer

References

  1. Yun, L., Bliault, A., Doo, J. (2010). WIG Craft and Ekranoplan. Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0042-5
  2. Abdul Baki, A., Rossani, N. H. S., Pua’at, A. A., Zhahir, A., Ahmad, M. T., Alias, N. H. (2023). Determination of Aerodynamic and Flight Performance Characteristics of WIG Craft: A Review. Proceedings of Aerospace Society Malaysia, 1 (1), 45–52. Available at: https://www.aerosmalaysia.my/aeros_proceedings/index.php/journal/article/view/6
  3. Park, J., Park, M., Park, J., Park, J. H., Song, C., Nam, B. W., Kim, D. K. (2024). A fuel-efficient pathfinding algorithm for next-generation WIG crafts. Ships and Offshore Structures, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2024.2356468
  4. Joiner, K. F., Swidan, A. A. (2023). Conceptualising a Hybrid Flying and Diving Craft. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 11 (8), 1541. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11081541
  5. Patria, D., Rossi, C., Fernandez, R. A. S., Dominguez, S. (2021). Nonlinear Control Strategies for an Autonomous Wing-In-Ground-Effect Vehicle. Sensors, 21 (12), 4193. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21124193
  6. Joiner, K. F., Swidan, A., Jewson, E., Carroll, N., Champ, D., Shpak, G. (2021). Submersible Seaplanes as the Path to Hybrid Flying and Diving Craft. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Unmanned Systems and Defense Industry 2021.
  7. Pedroz, R. (2023), Russia-Ukraine Conflict: The War at Sea. International Law Studies, 100, 1–61. Available at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/ils/vol100/iss1/1/
  8. Dreus, A., Aleksieienko, S., Nekrasov, V. (2024). Determining the aerodynamic performance of a high-speed unmanned marine wig craft. Applied Mechanics, 4 (7 (130)), 41–46. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2024.309708
  9. Karpuk, S. (2024). Constraint analysis methodology for ground-effect vehicle conceptual design. Ocean Engineering, 308, 118252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.118252
  10. Eppler, R. (1990). Airfoil Design and Data. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-02646-5
  11. Loutun, M. J. T., Didane, D. H., Mohideen Batcha, M. F., Abdullah, K., Mohd Ali, M. F., Mohammed, A. N., Afolabi, L. O. (2021). 2D CFD Simulation Study on the Performance of Various NACA Airfoils. CFD Letters, 13 (4), 38–50. https://doi.org/10.37934/cfdl.13.4.3850
  12. Bayram, H. (2022). Numerical investigation of airfoils aerodynamic performances. International Journal of Energy Applications and Technologies, 9 (1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.31593/ijeat.1033107
  13. Ahmed, M. R., Sharma, S. D. (2005). An investigation on the aerodynamics of a symmetrical airfoil in ground effect. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 29 (6), 633–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2004.09.001
  14. Tremblay-Dionne, V., Lee, T. (2019). Experimental Study on Effect of Wavelength and Amplitude of Wavy Ground on a NACA 0012 Airfoil. Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 32 (5). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)as.1943-5525.0001051
  15. Hsiun, C.-M., Chen, C.-K. (1995). Numerical Investigation of the Thickness and Camber Effects on Aerodynamic Characteristics for Two-dimensional Airfoils with Ground Effect in Viscous Flow. Transactions of the Japan Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences, 38, 77–90. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292690182_Numerical_investigation_of_the_thickness_and_camber_effects_on_aerodynamic_characteristics_for_two-dimensional_airfoils_with_ground_effect_in_viscous_flow
  16. Thianwiboon, M. (2023). A Numerical Comparative Study of the Selected Cambered and Reflexed Airfoils in Ground Effect. Engineering Journal, 27 (11), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.4186/ej.2023.27.11.39
  17. Li, S., Zhou, D., Zhang, Y., Qu, Q. (2015). Aerodynamic Investigation of RAE2822 Airfoil in Ground Effect. Procedia Engineering, 126, 174–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.11.208
  18. Deng, N., Agarwal, R. K. (2022). Numerical simulation of DLR-F6 wing-body flow field in ground effect. Computers & Fluids, 245, 105576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2022.105576
  19. Zohary, A. C., Asrar, W., Aldheeb, M. (2021). Numerical Investigation on the Pressure Drag of Some Low-Speed Airfoils for UAV Application. CFD Letters, 13 (2), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.37934/cfdl.13.2.2948
  20. Goman, O., Dreus, A., Rozhkevych, A., Heti, K., Karplyuk, V. (2022). Improving the efficiency of Darier rotor by controlling the aerodynamic design of blades. Energy Reports, 8, 788–794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.10.162
  21. Alekseyenko, S., Dreus, A., Dron, M., Brazaluk, O. (2022). Numerical Study of Aerodynamic Characteristics of a Pointed Plate of Variable Elongation in Subsonic and Supersonic Gas Flow. Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences, 96 (2), 88–97. https://doi.org/10.37934/arfmts.96.2.8897
  22. Prihod'ko, A. A. (2003). Komp'yuternye tekhnologii v aerogidromekhanike i teplomasoobmene. Kyiv: Naukova dumka, 380.
  23. Sokhatskyi, A., Dreus, A., Radovskyi, M., Horbonos, S. (2024). A review of the problem of modeling the aerodynamics of small-sized ekranoplanes. MATEC Web of Conferences, 390, 04011. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202439004011
  24. Park, K., Lee, J. (2010). Optimal design of two-dimensional wings in ground effect using multi-objective genetic algorithm. Ocean Engineering, 37 (10), 902–912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2010.03.001
  25. Joseph, D., Achari, A. K. A., Narayanan, J. P. (2021). Effect of ground on the shape optimisation of a symmetric aerofoil at low angles of attack. Progress in Computational Fluid Dynamics, An International Journal, 21 (4), 209. https://doi.org/10.1504/pcfd.2021.116537
  26. Williamson, G. A., McGranahan, B. D., Broughton, B. A., Deters, R. W., Brandt, J. B., Selig, M. S. (2012). Summary of Low-Speed Airfoil Data. Airfoil Profiles and Performance Plots. Vol. 5. Chap. 4. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Available at: https://m-selig.ae.illinois.edu/uiuc_lsat/Low-Speed-Airfoil-Data-V5.pdf
Rationale for choosing the airfoil of a UAV wing using a dynamic ground effect principle

Downloads

Published

2024-12-20

How to Cite

Dreus, A., & Kravets, O. (2024). Rationale for choosing the airfoil of a UAV wing using a dynamic ground effect principle. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6(1 (132), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2024.314844

Issue

Section

Engineering technological systems