Devising a deorbitation strategy for Kazakhstani’s KazEOSat-1 spacecraft

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2024.319226

Keywords:

Spacecraft, deorbiting, satellite disposal, LEO, space debris, orbit, CubeSat

Abstract

The object of this study is the process of deorbiting the KazEOSat-1 spacecraft, which has completed its active service life in low Earth orbit. The main problem is the lack of an effective technique to deorbit KazEOSat-1, taking into account its technical characteristics, orbital parameters, and the need to minimize risks to the environment and other objects in orbit.

As part of the work, a software model was built that takes into account the initial orbital parameters of the device, which are essential for planning and performing deorbiting maneuvers. The model is designed to accurately calculate the descent trajectory, taking into account the laws of celestial mechanics and the influence of atmospheric conditions. The optimal deorbiting strategy was selected based on an analysis of various methods for calculating orbital maneuvers aimed at reducing fuel consumption and minimizing environmental risks. This included a comparative analysis of existing approaches and the selection of the most suitable ones under the given mission parameters.

The results of the simulation using precise modeling methods in the MATLAB software environment allowed us to determine the main deorbiting parameters, such as the altitude at which the maneuvers begin, the required velocity impulses, the total fuel consumption, and the expected time before entering the dense layers of the atmosphere. Based on the obtained data, practical recommendations were formulated for the KazEOSat-1 deorbit. The first stage, the active controlled deorbit, is carried out by operating the low-thrust engine and braking by the Earth’s atmosphere, allowing the spacecraft to descend from 758 km to 444 km in 2.5 days. The second stage, the passive uncontrolled deorbit, continues the descent to 103 km in 969 days, using only atmospheric braking. The third stage, the uncontrolled drop, begins after reaching 103 km and ends with a drop to the Earth in 834 seconds

Author Biographies

Berik Zhumazhanov, Ghalam LLP

Head of Department

Department of Perspective and R&D Projects

Aigul Kulakayeva, International Information Technology University

PhD

Department of Radio Engineering, Electronics and Telecommunications

Abdikul Ashurov, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University

PhD, Head of Department

Department of Space Engineering and Technologies

Kazbek Baktybekov, Ghalam LLP

Doctor of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Professor, Lead Design Engineer

Ainur Zhetpisbayeva, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Radio Engineering, Electronics and Telecommunications

Daniyar Uskenbaev, S.Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical Research University

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Radio Engineering, Electronics and Telecommunications

Bexultan Zhumazhanov, Ghalam LLP

Design Engineer

Aigerim Zylgara, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University

Department of Space Engineering and Technologies

Aliya Kargulova, S.Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical Research University

Senior Lecturer

Department of Electric Power Supply

References

  1. Strategiya "Kazahstan-2050": noviy politicheskij kurs sostoyavshegosya gosudarstva. Informacionno-pravovaya sistema normativnyh pravovyh aktov Respubliki Kazahstan. Available at: https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/K1200002050
  2. ISO 24113:2023. Space systems - Space debris mitigation requirements.
  3. Zhang, R., Yang, K., Zhang, J., Bi, S. (2024). Overview and Key Technology of the Membrane Drag Sail for Low Earth Orbit Satellite Deorbit. Space: Science & Technology, 4. https://doi.org/10.34133/space.0115
  4. Niccolai, L., Mengali, G. (2024). Performance Estimate of a Spin-Stabilized Drag Sail for Spacecraft Deorbiting. Applied Sciences, 14 (2), 612. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14020612
  5. Zhang, J., Zhang, R., Yang, K. (2022). Attitude Stability Analysis and Configuration Design of Pyramid Drag Sail for Deorbit Missions. Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 35 (6). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)as.1943-5525.0001479
  6. Xu, Y., Yang, Y., Huang, H., Jia, H., Fang, G. (2024). Numerical simulation of rigid-flexible coupled dynamics for an inflatable sphere deorbiting device. Advances in Space Research, 74 (1), 373–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2024.03.049
  7. Rioseco Olave, D., Caqueo Jara, N., Cassineli Palharini, R., Santos Araujo Palharini, R., Gaglio, E., Savino, R. (2023). Inflatable aerodynamic decelerator for CubeSat reentry and recovery: Altitude effects on the flowfield structure. Aerospace Science and Technology, 138, 108358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2023.108358
  8. Caqueo, N., Palharini, R. C., Palharini, R. S. A., Gaglio, E., Savino, R. (2024). Inflatable aerodynamic decelerators for CubeSat reentry and recovery: Surface properties. Aerospace Science and Technology, 149, 109151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2024.109151
  9. Xiao, H., Huang, J., Liu, G., Lv, Y. (2020). Space Environment Modeling and Deorbiting Efficiency Analysis for Electro-dynamic Tether System. 2020 Chinese Control And Decision Conference (CCDC), 5063–5067. https://doi.org/10.1109/ccdc49329.2020.9164373
  10. Sarego, G., Olivieri, L., Valmorbida, A., Brunello, A., Lorenzini, E. C., Tarabini Castellani, L. et al. (2021). Deployment requirements for deorbiting electrodynamic tether technology. CEAS Space Journal, 13 (4), 567–581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12567-021-00349-5
  11. IADC Space Debris Mitigation Guidelines. Available at: https://orbitaldebris.jsc.nasa.gov/library/iadc-space-debris-guidelines-revision-2.pdf
  12. Vanessa, M. (Ed.) (2019). United Nations Handbook 2019–2020. Wellington: Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade of New Zealand, 58–60.
  13. Curtis, H. (2020). Orbital Mechanics for Engineering Students. Butterworth-Heinemann. https://doi.org/10.1016/c2016-0-02107-1
  14. Battin, R. H. (1999). An Introduction to the Mathematics and Methods of Astrodynamics, Revised Edition. AIAA. https://doi.org/10.2514/4.861543
  15. Brophy, J. R. (2000). Low-Thrust Propulsion Technology. Journal of Propulsion and Power.
  16. Janovsky, R., Kassebom, M., Lübberstedt, H., Romberg, O. et al. (2003). End-of-Life de -Orbiting Strategies for Satellites. 54th International Astronautical Congress of the International Astronautical Federation, the International Academy of Astronautics, and the International Institute of Space Law. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.iac-03-iaa.5.4.05
  17. Everetts, W., Rock, K., Iovanov, M. (2020). Iridium deorbit strategy, execution, and results. Journal of Space Safety Engineering, 7 (3), 351–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsse.2020.07.013
  18. NASA Orbital Debris Program Office. Available at: https://orbitaldebris.jsc.nasa.gov/
  19. Space Debris. Available at: https://www.esa.int/Space_Safety/Space_Debris
Devising a deorbitation strategy for Kazakhstani’s KazEOSat-1 spacecraft

Downloads

Published

2024-12-30

How to Cite

Zhumazhanov, B., Kulakayeva, A., Ashurov, A., Baktybekov, K., Zhetpisbayeva, A., Uskenbaev, D., Zhumazhanov, B., Zylgara, A., & Kargulova, A. (2024). Devising a deorbitation strategy for Kazakhstani’s KazEOSat-1 spacecraft. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6(5 (132), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2024.319226

Issue

Section

Applied physics