Improving a risk estimating method for the "Smart house" information system IT project

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2025.322051

Keywords:

smart house, IT project, risk assessment, Monte Carlo method, Support Vector Machine, Bayesian network

Abstract

The object of this study is the IT project risk management process.

The study solves the task to improve the accuracy of risk assessment in IT projects and, in particular, IT projects to design the information system (IS) "Smart House". Research into this area is mainly focused on the application of machine learning (ML) methods to improve the results of conventional evaluation methods. Issues related to quantitative risk assessment of IT projects to design the "Smart House" IS remain practically unexplored.

During the study, it was proposed to use ML methods for preprocessing the raw data. For this purpose, a combined risk assessment method was devised. In this technique, methods of Support Vector Machine and Bayesian networks were applied to process the raw data. The results of their application were used as input data for Monte Carlo simulations.

During the software implementation of the devised method, its technological stack was determined. Fragments of the program code are given, which describe the implementation of the basic elements of the combined method.

The devised method and its software implementation were used to assess the risk of delay in the implementation of the IT project to design the "Smart House" IS. The evaluation results determine the expected duration of this IT project at 234.5 days, with a deviation range of 226–244 days (with a 95 % confidence interval). The results of a comparative analysis of the obtained estimates with estimates of the same risk obtained using the conventional Monte Carlo method show that the devised method provides higher reliability of forecasts.

The application of research findings makes it possible to improve the quality of managing IT projects by increasing the accuracy and reliability of their risk assessments

Author Biographies

Maksym Ievlanov, Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor

Department of Information Control System

Nataliia Vasyltsova, Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Information Control System

Iryna Panforova, Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Information Control System

References

  1. Gaied, A. (2020). Smart Home for beginners: Designing and building a smart house. Books on Demand, 81.
  2. Evenson, A. (2024). How to Build you Own Smart Home: A simple guide for beginners to upgrade and automate any house system.
  3. The standard for risk management in portfolios, programs, and projects (2019). Project Management Institute, 175.
  4. Hamilton, S. (2017). How to Make Your Home a Smart Home. Createspace Independent Publishing Platform, 238.
  5. Morozova, O., Tetskyi, A., Nicheporuk, A., Kruvak, D., Tkachov, V. (2022). Smart home system security risk assessment. Computer Systems and Information Technologies, 3, 81–88. https://doi.org/10.31891/csit-2021-5-11
  6. Hopkin, P., Thompson, C. (2021). Fundamentals of Risk Management: Understanding, Evaluating and Implementing Effective Risk Management. Kogan Page, 480.
  7. Jacobsson, A., Boldt, M., Carlsson, B. (2016). A risk analysis of a smart home automation system. Future Generation Computer Systems, 56, 719–733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2015.09.003
  8. Tereshchenko, L. (2021). Risk management of information systems: stages of the risk management process. Economy and Society, 31. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2021-31-12
  9. Kurdupov, O. L., Potapova, N. A. (2021). Vykorystannia metodu Monte-Karlo dlia analizu proektnykh ryzykiv. Materialy II Vseukrainskoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsiyi «Kompiuterni tekhnolohiyi obrobky danykh». Vinnytsia, 138–141. Available at: https://jktod.donnu.edu.ua/article/view/11711
  10. ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288:2023. Systems and software engineering. System life cycle processes. https://doi.org/10.1109/ieeestd.2023.10123367
  11. Rashid, C. H., Shafi, I., Ahmad, J., Thompson, E. B., Vergara, M. M., de la Torre Diez, I., Ashraf, I. (2023). Software Cost and Effort Estimation: Current Approaches and Future Trends. IEEE Access, 11, 99268–99288. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2023.3312716
  12. Ramaekers, R., Silhavy, R., Silhavy, P. (2023). Software Cost Estimation Using Neural Networks. Software Engineering Research in System Science, 831–847. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35311-6_77
  13. Kumar, B. N. R., Suresh, Y. (2022). Effective ANN Model based on Neuro-Evolution Mechanism for Realistic Software Estimates in the Early Phase of Software Development. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 13 (2). https://doi.org/10.14569/ijacsa.2022.0130223
  14. Nassar, A. H., Elbisy, A. M. (2024). A Machine Learning Approach to Predict Time Delays in Marine Construction Projects. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, 14 (5), 16125–16134. https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.8173
  15. Aljorany, H. O., Mahjoob, A. M. R. (2024). Establishing a Budget for Optimal Response Strategies for Risks Categorized into Distinct Groups by using a Mathematical Model and Genetic Algorithm. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, 14 (3), 14747–14753. https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.7526
  16. Khan, T., Faisal, Mohd. (2023). An efficient Bayesian network model (BNM) for software risk prediction in design phase development. International Journal of Information Technology, 15 (4), 2147–2160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-023-01244-4
  17. Bilousiva, L., Gryzun, L., Zhytienova, N., Pikalova, V. (2023). Issues of Formalization of Risk Management Process in Software Design. Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Intelligent Information Technologies & Systems of Information Security. Khmelnytskyi, 48–57. Available at: https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3373/keynote4.pdf
  18. Bekishev, Y., Pisarenko, Z., Arkadiev, V. (2023). FMEA Model in Risk Analysis for the Implementation of AGV/AMR Robotic Technologies into the Internal Supply System of Enterprises. Risks, 11 (10), 172. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks11100172
  19. Albany, M., Alsahafi, E., Alruwili, I., Elkhediri, S. (2022). A review: Secure Internet of thing System for Smart Houses. Procedia Computer Science, 201, 437–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.03.057
  20. Harkai, A. (2024). Managing cyber-security risks associated with IoT devices for conducting financial transactions within the smart home ecosystem. Procedia Computer Science, 242, 200–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.08.260
  21. Garlick, A. (2007). Monte Carlo. Estimating Risk, 213–232. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315256122-25
  22. Paltrinieri, N., Comfort, L., Reniers, G. (2019). Learning about risk: Machine learning for risk assessment. Safety Science, 118, 475–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.06.001
  23. Hovorushchenko, T., Aleksov, S., Talapchuk, S., Shpylyuk, O., Magdin, V. (2022). Overview of the methods and tools for situation identification and decision-making support in the cyberphysical system «smart house». Computer Systems and Information Technologies, 4, 20–26. https://doi.org/10.31891/csit-2022-4-3
  24. Abdallah, Z. S., Du, L., Webb, G. I. (2023). Data Preparation. Encyclopedia of Machine Learning and Data Science, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7502-7_62-2
  25. Li, В., Lu, Р. (2024). Normalize Data component. Azure Machine Learning. Available at: https://learn.microsoft.com/uk-ua/azure/machine-learning/component-reference/normalize-data?view=azureml-api-2
  26. Jo, T. (2020). Data Encoding. Machine Learning Foundations, 47–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65900-4_3
  27. Kelleher, J. D. (2019). Deep Learning. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11171.001.0001
  28. Leshchuk, H. V. (2017). Simulation Analysis of Monte Carlo in the System of Investment Projects Risks Assessment. Ukrainian Journal of Applied Economics, 2 (1), 57–67. Available at: http://ujae.wunu.edu.ua/index.php/ujae/article/view/119
  29. Novkov, A. (2024). Monte Carlo Charts: How to Use Them in Practice? Available at: https://businessmap.io/blog/monte-carlo-chart-graph
  30. Yak vybraty pravylnyi tekhnolohichnyi stek dlia vashoho proektu. REDSTONE. Available at: https://redstone.agency/blog/yak-vybraty-pravylnyi-tekhnolohichnyi-stek-dlia-vashoho-proektu/
Improving a risk estimating method for the "Smart house" information system IT project

Downloads

Published

2025-02-21

How to Cite

Ievlanov, M., Vasyltsova, N., Panforova, I., & Kliuvanskyi, Y. (2025). Improving a risk estimating method for the "Smart house" information system IT project. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1(3 (133), 6–16. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2025.322051

Issue

Section

Control processes