Determining the effect of modified additives on the fire-extinguishing properties of compressed air foam

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2025.325930

Keywords:

compressed air foam, modified additives, fire extinguishing properties, class A fires, extinguishing efficiency

Abstract

The object of this study is the fire extinguishing efficiency of compressed air foam with the use of modified additives.

The main hypothesis assumes that the use of modified additives in the composition of the compressed air foam will affect its fire extinguishing efficiency when extinguishing solid combustible materials.

The task addressed is to determine the effect of modified additives in compressed air foam with a concentration range of 1–5 % on its fire extinguishing properties. The results show that for all additives, when the concentration changes from 1 % to 5 %, characteristic is a slight decrease in the consumption of an aqueous solution of the foaming agent. On the contrary, an increase in the expansion ratio results in a significant decrease in the mass of the aqueous solution of the foaming agent consumed for extinguishing. An increase in the concentration of the additive in the range of 1 % to 3 % is characterized by a decrease in the extinguishing time, while a further increase from 3 % to 5 % is characterized by an increase in the extinguishing time. Also, the increase in the foam expansion ratio has a significant effect; with an increase from 5 to 20, a decrease in the extinguishing time is observed, and with a further increase to 25, an increase in time occurs.

For the compressed air foam with NH4H2PO4, the highest efficiency index is Ie.e≈20.15 m2/l∙s, at a modified additive concentration of C≈3 % and a foam expansion ratio of K≈18; for the compressed air foam with (NH4)2HPO4, the highest efficiency index is Ie.e=18.04 m2/l∙s, at a modified additive concentration of C≈3 % and a foam expansion ratio of K≈18; for a compression foam with (NH4)2CO3, the highest efficiency index is Ie.e=14.99 m2/l∙s, at a modified additive concentration C≈3 % and a foam expansion ratio of K≈18.

Thus, based on the results of experimental studies, the most effective is the compressed air foam with NH4H2PO4. The resulting extinguishing efficiency is 11 % higher than that of the compressed air foam with (NH4)2HPO4, and 26 % higher than that of the compressed air foam with (NH4)2CO3

Author Biographies

Stanislav Shakhov, Cherkasy Institute of Fire Safety named after Chornobyl Heroes of the National University of Civil Defence of Ukraine

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Engineering and Rescue Machinery

Stanislav Vynohradov, Cherkasy Institute of Fire Safety named after Chornobyl Heroes of the National University of Civil Defence of Ukraine

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Engineering and Rescue Machinery

Dmytry Hryschenko, Cherkasy Institute of Fire Safety named after Chornobyl Heroes of the National University of Civil Defence of Ukraine

Department of Engineering and Rescue Machinery

Alexander Savchenko, Cherkasy Institute of Fire Safety named after Chornobyl Heroes of the National University of Civil Defence of Ukraine

PhD, Senior Researcher

Department of Organization of Regulatory and Legal Work in the Field of Fire Safety

Evgen Grinchenko, Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs

PhD, Associate Professor

Research Laboratory on the Problems of Information Technologies and Combating Crime in Cyberspace

Liudmyla Knaub, Military Academy

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor

Department of Engineering Mechanics

Nataliia Maslich, Military Academy

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Engineering Mechanics

Tetiana Mohylianets, Military Academy

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Engineering Mechanics

Viktor Shevchuk, Lviv State University of Life Safety

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Operation of Vehicles and Fire-Rescue Machinery

Andrij Dominik, Lviv State University of Life Safety

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Operation of Vehicles and Fire-Rescue Machinery

References

  1. Dubinin, D., Korytchenko, K., Lisnyak, A., Hrytsyna, I., Trigub, V. (2018). Improving the installation for fire extinguishing with finely­dispersed water. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2 (10 (92)), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2018.127865
  2. Ostapov, K., Kirichenko, I., Senchykhin, Y., Syrovyi, V., Vorontsova, D., Belikov, A. et al. (2019). Improvement of the installation with an extended barrel of cranked type used for fire extinguishing by gel-forming compositions. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 4 (10 (100)), 30–36. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2019.174592
  3. Shakhov, S., Vinogradov, S., Grishenko, D. (2023). Analysis of ways to increase the efficiency of compressed air foam for extinguishing solid materials. Municipal Economy of Cities, 1 (175), 151–159. https://doi.org/10.33042/2522-1809-2023-1-175-151-159
  4. Rie, D.-H., Lee, J.-W., Kim, S. (2016). Class B Fire-Extinguishing Performance Evaluation of a Compressed Air Foam System at Different Air-to-Aqueous Foam Solution Mixing Ratios. Applied Sciences, 6 (7), 191. https://doi.org/10.3390/app6070191
  5. Cheng, J., Xu, M. (2014). Experimental Research of Integrated Compressed Air Foam System of Fixed (ICAF) for Liquid Fuel. Procedia Engineering, 71, 44–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.04.007
  6. Chen, T., Fu, X., Bao, Z., Xia, J., Wang, R. (2018). Experimental Study on the Extinguishing Efficiency of Compressed Air Foam Sprinkler System on Oil Pool Fire. Procedia Engineering, 211, 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.12.142
  7. Wang, K., Fang, J., Shah, H. R., Mu, S., Lang, X., Wang, J., Zhang, Y. (2020). A theoretical and experimental study of extinguishing compressed air foam on an n-heptane storage tank fire with variable fuel thickness. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 138, 117–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2020.03.011
  8. Zhao, M., Ni, X., Zhang, S., Cao, W., Guan, Y., Liang, C. et al. (2014). Improving the performance of fluoroprotein foam in extinguishing gasoline pool fires with addition of bromofluoropropene. Fire and Materials, 40 (2), 261–272. https://doi.org/10.1002/fam.2284
  9. Li, Z., Zhu, H., Zhao, J., Zhang, Y., Hu, L. (2022). Experimental Research on the Effectiveness of Different Types of Foam of Extinguishing Methanol / Diesel Pool Fires. Combustion Science and Technology, 196 (12), 1791–1809. https://doi.org/10.1080/00102202.2022.2125306
  10. Wang, X., Liao, Y., Lin, L. (2009). Experimental study on fire extinguishing with a newly prepared multi-component compressed air foam. Science Bulletin, 54 (3), 492–496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-008-0571-3
  11. Lee, Y.-K., Kim, Y.-S., Kang, Y.-S., Rie, D.-H. (2017). A Study on the Evaluation of Fire Extinguishing Performance of a Synthetic Surfactant Compressed Air Foam with Scaled Model. Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation, 17 (6), 269–276. https://doi.org/10.9798/kosham.2017.17.6.269
  12. Xu, Z., Guo, X., Yan, L., Kang, W. (2020). Fire-extinguishing performance and mechanism of aqueous film-forming foam in diesel pool fire. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 17, 100578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2019.100578
  13. Wang, K., Fang, J., Shah, H. R., Lang, X., Mu, S., Zhang, Y., Wang, J. (2021). Research on the influence of foaming gas in compressed air/nitrogen foam on extinguishing the n-heptane tank fire. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 72, 104533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2021.104533
  14. Shakhov, S., Vinogradov, S., Gruschenko, D. (2023). Analysis of the experience of using modifiing additives and their physico-chemical properties for further application in the composition of compressed air foam. Fire Safety, 42, 85–95. https://doi.org/10.32447/20786662.42.2023.10
  15. NFPA 1145. Guide for the Use of Class A Foams in Fire Fighting. Available at: https://www.nfpa.org/codes-and-standards/all-codes-and-standards/list-of-codes-and-standards/detail?code=1145
  16. Shakhov, S., Vinogradov, S., Kodryk, A., Titenko, O. (2019). Dependence of the fire extinguishing efficiency of compression foam on its structure and the amount of foaming agent. Problems of fire safety, 46, 199–205. Available at: http://repositsc.nuczu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/12273
  17. Kodryk, A., Titenko, O., Vynohradov, S., Shakhov, S., Hryshchenko, D. (2024). Development of a test sample of a system for generating and supplying compressed air foam. Municipal Economy of Cities, 4 (185), 172–177. https://doi.org/10.33042/2522-1809-2024-4-185-172-177
  18. Guo, W., Zhu, G., Yao, B., Chen, F., Xu, X. (2021). Study on the fire extinguishing mechanism of small size wood crib based on small sand-throwing equipment. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 25, 100942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2021.100942
  19. Diab, M. T., Haelssig, J. B., Pegg, M. J. (2020). The behaviour of wood crib fires under free burning and fire whirl conditions. Fire Safety Journal, 112, 102941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2019.102941
  20. Park, J., Kwark, J. (2021). Experimental Study on Fire Sources for Full-Scale Fire Testing of Simple Sprinkler Systems Installed in Multiplexes. Fire, 4 (1), 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire4010008
  21. Vynarskyi, M. S., Lurie, M. V. (1975). Planning an experiment in a technological environment. Kyiv: Tekhnika, 168.
  22. Shakhov, S., Vynohradov, S., Kodryk, A., Titenko, O., Melnychenko, A., Hryschenko, D. et al. (2024). Influence of modified additives on the properties of compressed air foam. Technology Organic and Inorganic Substances, 4 (6 (130)), 38–48. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2024.310371
Determining the effect of modified additives on the fire-extinguishing properties of compressed air foam

Downloads

Published

2025-04-30

How to Cite

Shakhov, S., Vynohradov, S., Hryschenko, D., Savchenko, A., Grinchenko, E., Knaub, L., Maslich, N., Mohylianets, T., Shevchuk, V., & Dominik, A. (2025). Determining the effect of modified additives on the fire-extinguishing properties of compressed air foam. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2(10 (134), 44–52. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2025.325930