Determination of the possibility of using biogas technologies for the introduction of energy-saving systems microclimate

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2025.341736

Keywords:

energy-saving technologies, microclimate systems, renewable energy sources, biogas plants, waste disposal

Abstract

The object of this study is the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions generated in livestock farming, primarily methane (CH4) from enteric fermentation and nitrous oxide (N2O) from manure management processes. The problem under study is the lack of instrumental methods and national programs for measuring and reducing emissions from confined animals, which results in excessive methane release and inefficient manure utilization.

Based on inventory data, the results show that annual agricultural emissions amount to 20,982.25 thousand tons of CO2-eq. methane (58% of agricultural GHGs) and 15,239.72 thousand tons of CO2-eq. nitrous oxide (42%), with a total of 319.547 million tons of CO2, 2.313 million tons of CH4, and 0.058 million tons of N2O released in 2018. Interpretation of these results confirms that improper manure storage, outdated technologies, and the absence of biogas recovery systems are the main contributors to elevated GHG emissions worldwide.

The distinctive feature of this research is the development of autonomous climate-friendly bioenergy systems equipped with solar collectors and bioreactors that convert animal waste into biogas and organic fertilizer. This innovative technological solution not only explains the mechanisms of emission reduction but also demonstrates how livestock enterprises can generate renewable thermal and electrical energy, covering up to 80–85% of their total energy demand. The practical significance of the study lies in demonstrating how the integration of such biogas technologies can improve environmental safety, reduce dependence on fossil fuels, enhance long-term energy resilience, and promote sustainable agricultural development on a global scale

Author Biographies

Ruslan Kassym, ALT University; University of Jaén

Supervisor Project, Researcher

Department of Information and Communication Technologies

Department of Electrical Engineering

Asan Baibolov, Kazakh National Agrarian Research University

PhD Doctor, Associate Professor

Department of Energy and Electrical Engineering

Nessipbek Alibek, Kazakh National Agrarian Research University

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Energy and Electrical Engineering

Shurat Sydykov, Kazakh National Agrarian Research University

Candidate of Technical Sciences, Professor

Department of Energy and Electrical Engineering

Francisco Jurado, University of Jaén

Professor

Department of Electrical Engineering

Gulnar Akhmetkanova, Kazakh National Agrarian Research University

Doctoral Student

Department of Energy and Electrical Engineering

Gulfairuz Zhunisbekova, NARXOZ University

PhD, Senior Lector

Department of Energy

Amanzhol Tokmoldayev, ALT University

Senior Lector

Department of IT Energy

References

  1. Islam, S. M. M., Gaihre, Y. K., Biswas, J. C., Jahan, Md. S., Singh, U., Adhikary, S. K. et al. (2018). Different nitrogen rates and methods of application for dry season rice cultivation with alternate wetting and drying irrigation: Fate of nitrogen and grain yield. Agricultural Water Management, 196, 144–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2017.11.002
  2. Schmithausen, A. J., Schiefler, I., Trimborn, M., Gerlach, K., Südekum, K.-H., Pries, M., Büscher, W. (2018). Quantification of Methane and Ammonia Emissions in a Naturally Ventilated Barn by Using Defined Criteria to Calculate Emission Rates. Animals, 8 (5), 75. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani8050075
  3. Genstwa, N., Zmyślona, J. (2023). Greenhouse Gas Emissions Efficiency in Polish Agriculture. Agriculture, 14 (1), 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14010056
  4. Bobrowski, A. B., Willink, D., Janke, D., Amon, T., Hagenkamp-Korth, F., Hasler, M., Hartung, E. (2021). Reduction of ammonia emissions by applying a urease inhibitor in naturally ventilated dairy barns. Biosystems Engineering, 204, 104–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2021.01.011
  5. Džermeikaitė, K., Krištolaitytė, J., Antanaitis, R. (2024). Relationship between Dairy Cow Health and Intensity of Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Animals, 14 (6), 829. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14060829
  6. Waghorn, G. C., Hegarty, R. S. (2011). Lowering ruminant methane emissions through improved feed conversion efficiency. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 166-167, 291–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.019
  7. Bell, M. J., Wall, E., Simm, G., Russell, G. (2011). Effects of genetic line and feeding system on methane emissions from dairy systems. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 166-167, 699–707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.049
  8. Shibata, M., Terada, F. (2010). Factors affecting methane production and mitigation in ruminants. Animal Science Journal, 81 (1), 2–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-0929.2009.00687.x
  9. Baibolov, A., Sydykov, S., Alibek, N., Tokmoldayev, A., Turdybek, B., Jurado, F., Kassym, R. (2022). Map of zoning of the territory of Kazakhstan by the average temperature of the heating period in order to select a heat pump system of heat supply: A case study. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 44 (3), 7303–7315. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2022.2108168
  10. National report on the state of the environment and on the use of natural resources of the Republic of Kazakhstan for 2019. Available at: https://www.cawater-info.net/pdf/ndsos_2019.pdf
  11. Rotz, C. A. (2018). Modeling greenhouse gas emissions from dairy farms. Journal of Dairy Science, 101 (7), 6675–6690. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13272
  12. Gomez-Zavaglia, A., Mejuto, J. C., Simal-Gandara, J. (2020). Mitigation of emerging implications of climate change on food production systems. Food Research International, 134, 109256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109256
  13. Qian, H., Zhu, X., Huang, S., Linquist, B., Kuzyakov, Y., Wassmann, R. et al. (2023). Greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation in rice agriculture. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 4 (10), 716–732. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-023-00482-1
  14. Bai, M., Sun, J., Denmead, O. T., Chen, D. (2017). Comparing emissions from a cattle pen as measured by two micrometeorological techniques. Environmental Pollution, 230, 584–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.07.012
  15. Janke, D., Willink, D., Ammon, C., Hempel, S., Schrade, S., Demeyer, P. et al. (2020). Calculation of ventilation rates and ammonia emissions: Comparison of sampling strategies for a naturally ventilated dairy barn. Biosystems Engineering, 198, 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2020.07.011
  16. Qu, Q., Groot, J. C. J., Zhang, K., Schulte, R. P. O. (2021). Effects of housing system, measurement methods and environmental factors on estimating ammonia and methane emission rates in dairy barns: A meta-analysis. Biosystems Engineering, 205, 64–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2021.02.012
  17. Mc Geough, E. J., Little, S. M., Janzen, H. H., McAllister, T. A., McGinn, S. M., Beauchemin, K. A. (2012). Life-cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from dairy production in Eastern Canada: A case study. Journal of Dairy Science, 95 (9), 5164–5175. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-5229
  18. Chianese, D. S., Rotz, C. A.. Richard, T. L. (2009). Whole-Farm Greenhouse Gas Emissions: A Review with Application to a Pennsylvania Dairy Farm. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 25 (3), 431–442. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.26895
  19. Tubiello, F. N., Salvatore, M., Rossi, S., Ferrara, A., Fitton, N., Smith, P. (2013). The FAOSTAT database of greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture. Environmental Research Letters, 8 (1), 015009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/015009
  20. Hadipour, A., Mohit, A., Kuhi, H. D., Hashemzadeh, F. (2021). Recent Nutritional Advances to Mitigate Methane Emission in Cattle: A Review. Iranian Journal of Applied Animal Science, 11 (1).
  21. Islam, S. M. M., Gaihre, Y. K., Islam, M. N., Jahan, A., Sarkar, M. A. R., Singh, U. et al. (2024). Effects of integrated nutrient management and urea deep placement on rice yield, nitrogen use efficiency, farm profits and greenhouse gas emissions in saline soils of Bangladesh. Science of The Total Environment, 909, 168660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168660
  22. Shen, M., Huang, W., Chen, M., Song, B., Zeng, G., Zhang, Y. (2020). (Micro)plastic crisis: Un-ignorable contribution to global greenhouse gas emissions and climate change. Journal of Cleaner Production, 254, 120138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120138
  23. Aboagye, I. A., Beauchemin, K. A. (2019). Potential of Molecular Weight and Structure of Tannins to Reduce Methane Emissions from Ruminants: A Review. Animals, 9 (11), 856. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9110856
  24. Clemens, J., Cuhls, C. (2003). Greenhouse gas emissions from mechanical and biological waste treatment of municipal waste. Environmental Technology, 24 (6), 745–754. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330309385611
  25. Hashish, M. S., Hasanien, H. M., Ji, H., Alkuhayli, A., Alharbi, M., Akmaral, T. et al. (2023). Monte Carlo Simulation and a Clustering Technique for Solving the Probabilistic Optimal Power Flow Problem for Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems. Sustainability, 15 (1), 783. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010783
  26. Tlenshiyeva, A., Tostado-Véliz, M., Hasanien, H. M., Khosravi, N., Jurado, F. (2024). A data-driven methodology to design user-friendly tariffs in energy communities. Electric Power Systems Research, 228, 110108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2023.110108
  27. Baimukhanbetov, A., Bakhtiyar, B., Tokmoldayev, A., Kassym, R., Tursunbayeva, G., Korobkov, M. et al. (2025). Improvement of technology of biological purification of waste from sheep farms. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2 (10 (134)), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2025.323371
  28. Iskakov, R., Gulyarenko, A., Bembenek, M., Kassym, R. (2025). Technologies for efficient grinding of plant and animal waste: a review. EUREKA: Physics and Engineering, 2, 54–77. https://doi.org/10.21303/2461-4262.2025.003733
  29. Utegenova, A., Bapyshev, A., Suimenbayeva, Z., Aden, A., Kassym, R., Tansaule, S. (2023). Development system for coordination of activities of experts in the formation of machineschetable standards in the field of military and space activities based on ontological engineering: a case study. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5 (2 (125)), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2023.288542
Determination of the possibility of using biogas technologies for the introduction of energy-saving systems microclimate

Downloads

Published

2025-10-28

How to Cite

Kassym, R., Baibolov, A., Alibek, N., Sydykov, S., Jurado, F., Akhmetkanova, G., Zhunisbekova, G., & Tokmoldayev, A. (2025). Determination of the possibility of using biogas technologies for the introduction of energy-saving systems microclimate. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5(10 (137), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2025.341736