Determination of the possibility of using biogas technologies for the introduction of energy-saving systems microclimate
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2025.341736Keywords:
energy-saving technologies, microclimate systems, renewable energy sources, biogas plants, waste disposalAbstract
The object of this study is the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions generated in livestock farming, primarily methane (CH4) from enteric fermentation and nitrous oxide (N2O) from manure management processes. The problem under study is the lack of instrumental methods and national programs for measuring and reducing emissions from confined animals, which results in excessive methane release and inefficient manure utilization.
Based on inventory data, the results show that annual agricultural emissions amount to 20,982.25 thousand tons of CO2-eq. methane (58% of agricultural GHGs) and 15,239.72 thousand tons of CO2-eq. nitrous oxide (42%), with a total of 319.547 million tons of CO2, 2.313 million tons of CH4, and 0.058 million tons of N2O released in 2018. Interpretation of these results confirms that improper manure storage, outdated technologies, and the absence of biogas recovery systems are the main contributors to elevated GHG emissions worldwide.
The distinctive feature of this research is the development of autonomous climate-friendly bioenergy systems equipped with solar collectors and bioreactors that convert animal waste into biogas and organic fertilizer. This innovative technological solution not only explains the mechanisms of emission reduction but also demonstrates how livestock enterprises can generate renewable thermal and electrical energy, covering up to 80–85% of their total energy demand. The practical significance of the study lies in demonstrating how the integration of such biogas technologies can improve environmental safety, reduce dependence on fossil fuels, enhance long-term energy resilience, and promote sustainable agricultural development on a global scale
References
- Islam, S. M. M., Gaihre, Y. K., Biswas, J. C., Jahan, Md. S., Singh, U., Adhikary, S. K. et al. (2018). Different nitrogen rates and methods of application for dry season rice cultivation with alternate wetting and drying irrigation: Fate of nitrogen and grain yield. Agricultural Water Management, 196, 144–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2017.11.002
- Schmithausen, A. J., Schiefler, I., Trimborn, M., Gerlach, K., Südekum, K.-H., Pries, M., Büscher, W. (2018). Quantification of Methane and Ammonia Emissions in a Naturally Ventilated Barn by Using Defined Criteria to Calculate Emission Rates. Animals, 8 (5), 75. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani8050075
- Genstwa, N., Zmyślona, J. (2023). Greenhouse Gas Emissions Efficiency in Polish Agriculture. Agriculture, 14 (1), 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14010056
- Bobrowski, A. B., Willink, D., Janke, D., Amon, T., Hagenkamp-Korth, F., Hasler, M., Hartung, E. (2021). Reduction of ammonia emissions by applying a urease inhibitor in naturally ventilated dairy barns. Biosystems Engineering, 204, 104–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2021.01.011
- Džermeikaitė, K., Krištolaitytė, J., Antanaitis, R. (2024). Relationship between Dairy Cow Health and Intensity of Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Animals, 14 (6), 829. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14060829
- Waghorn, G. C., Hegarty, R. S. (2011). Lowering ruminant methane emissions through improved feed conversion efficiency. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 166-167, 291–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.019
- Bell, M. J., Wall, E., Simm, G., Russell, G. (2011). Effects of genetic line and feeding system on methane emissions from dairy systems. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 166-167, 699–707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.049
- Shibata, M., Terada, F. (2010). Factors affecting methane production and mitigation in ruminants. Animal Science Journal, 81 (1), 2–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-0929.2009.00687.x
- Baibolov, A., Sydykov, S., Alibek, N., Tokmoldayev, A., Turdybek, B., Jurado, F., Kassym, R. (2022). Map of zoning of the territory of Kazakhstan by the average temperature of the heating period in order to select a heat pump system of heat supply: A case study. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 44 (3), 7303–7315. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2022.2108168
- National report on the state of the environment and on the use of natural resources of the Republic of Kazakhstan for 2019. Available at: https://www.cawater-info.net/pdf/ndsos_2019.pdf
- Rotz, C. A. (2018). Modeling greenhouse gas emissions from dairy farms. Journal of Dairy Science, 101 (7), 6675–6690. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13272
- Gomez-Zavaglia, A., Mejuto, J. C., Simal-Gandara, J. (2020). Mitigation of emerging implications of climate change on food production systems. Food Research International, 134, 109256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109256
- Qian, H., Zhu, X., Huang, S., Linquist, B., Kuzyakov, Y., Wassmann, R. et al. (2023). Greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation in rice agriculture. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 4 (10), 716–732. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-023-00482-1
- Bai, M., Sun, J., Denmead, O. T., Chen, D. (2017). Comparing emissions from a cattle pen as measured by two micrometeorological techniques. Environmental Pollution, 230, 584–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.07.012
- Janke, D., Willink, D., Ammon, C., Hempel, S., Schrade, S., Demeyer, P. et al. (2020). Calculation of ventilation rates and ammonia emissions: Comparison of sampling strategies for a naturally ventilated dairy barn. Biosystems Engineering, 198, 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2020.07.011
- Qu, Q., Groot, J. C. J., Zhang, K., Schulte, R. P. O. (2021). Effects of housing system, measurement methods and environmental factors on estimating ammonia and methane emission rates in dairy barns: A meta-analysis. Biosystems Engineering, 205, 64–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2021.02.012
- Mc Geough, E. J., Little, S. M., Janzen, H. H., McAllister, T. A., McGinn, S. M., Beauchemin, K. A. (2012). Life-cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from dairy production in Eastern Canada: A case study. Journal of Dairy Science, 95 (9), 5164–5175. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-5229
- Chianese, D. S., Rotz, C. A.. Richard, T. L. (2009). Whole-Farm Greenhouse Gas Emissions: A Review with Application to a Pennsylvania Dairy Farm. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 25 (3), 431–442. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.26895
- Tubiello, F. N., Salvatore, M., Rossi, S., Ferrara, A., Fitton, N., Smith, P. (2013). The FAOSTAT database of greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture. Environmental Research Letters, 8 (1), 015009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/015009
- Hadipour, A., Mohit, A., Kuhi, H. D., Hashemzadeh, F. (2021). Recent Nutritional Advances to Mitigate Methane Emission in Cattle: A Review. Iranian Journal of Applied Animal Science, 11 (1).
- Islam, S. M. M., Gaihre, Y. K., Islam, M. N., Jahan, A., Sarkar, M. A. R., Singh, U. et al. (2024). Effects of integrated nutrient management and urea deep placement on rice yield, nitrogen use efficiency, farm profits and greenhouse gas emissions in saline soils of Bangladesh. Science of The Total Environment, 909, 168660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168660
- Shen, M., Huang, W., Chen, M., Song, B., Zeng, G., Zhang, Y. (2020). (Micro)plastic crisis: Un-ignorable contribution to global greenhouse gas emissions and climate change. Journal of Cleaner Production, 254, 120138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120138
- Aboagye, I. A., Beauchemin, K. A. (2019). Potential of Molecular Weight and Structure of Tannins to Reduce Methane Emissions from Ruminants: A Review. Animals, 9 (11), 856. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9110856
- Clemens, J., Cuhls, C. (2003). Greenhouse gas emissions from mechanical and biological waste treatment of municipal waste. Environmental Technology, 24 (6), 745–754. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330309385611
- Hashish, M. S., Hasanien, H. M., Ji, H., Alkuhayli, A., Alharbi, M., Akmaral, T. et al. (2023). Monte Carlo Simulation and a Clustering Technique for Solving the Probabilistic Optimal Power Flow Problem for Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems. Sustainability, 15 (1), 783. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010783
- Tlenshiyeva, A., Tostado-Véliz, M., Hasanien, H. M., Khosravi, N., Jurado, F. (2024). A data-driven methodology to design user-friendly tariffs in energy communities. Electric Power Systems Research, 228, 110108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2023.110108
- Baimukhanbetov, A., Bakhtiyar, B., Tokmoldayev, A., Kassym, R., Tursunbayeva, G., Korobkov, M. et al. (2025). Improvement of technology of biological purification of waste from sheep farms. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2 (10 (134)), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2025.323371
- Iskakov, R., Gulyarenko, A., Bembenek, M., Kassym, R. (2025). Technologies for efficient grinding of plant and animal waste: a review. EUREKA: Physics and Engineering, 2, 54–77. https://doi.org/10.21303/2461-4262.2025.003733
- Utegenova, A., Bapyshev, A., Suimenbayeva, Z., Aden, A., Kassym, R., Tansaule, S. (2023). Development system for coordination of activities of experts in the formation of machineschetable standards in the field of military and space activities based on ontological engineering: a case study. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5 (2 (125)), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2023.288542
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ruslan Kassym, Asan Baibolov, Nessipbek Alibek, Shurat Sydykov, Francisco Jurado, Gulnar Akhmetkanova, Gulfairuz Zhunisbekova, Amanzhol Tokmoldayev

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.
A license agreement is a document in which the author warrants that he/she owns all copyright for the work (manuscript, article, etc.).
The authors, signing the License Agreement with TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC, have all rights to the further use of their work, provided that they link to our edition in which the work was published.
According to the terms of the License Agreement, the Publisher TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC does not take away your copyrights and receives permission from the authors to use and dissemination of the publication through the world's scientific resources (own electronic resources, scientometric databases, repositories, libraries, etc.).
In the absence of a signed License Agreement or in the absence of this agreement of identifiers allowing to identify the identity of the author, the editors have no right to work with the manuscript.
It is important to remember that there is another type of agreement between authors and publishers – when copyright is transferred from the authors to the publisher. In this case, the authors lose ownership of their work and may not use it in any way.





