Substantiating the design of equipment for preparing oil and gas field products for transportation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2026.357605

Keywords:

oil and gas fields, hydrocarbon transportation, hydrocarbon preparation, formation water, thermodynamic modeling

Abstract

This study investigates processes that separate gas-liquid flows and purify formation water in the equipment for oil and gas field production preparation units.

At the late stage of field development, the efficiency of separation depends on the ability of the equipment to operate under conditions of waterlogging, an increase in the content of mechanical impurities, and a decrease in formation pressure. Under such conditions, conventional separation equipment does not provide the required quality of hydrocarbon separation and purification of formation water.

The task addressed in this work has been solved by improving the internal structural elements in the three-phase separator and a cyclone in the hydrocarbon preparation unit. Hydraulic losses were within permissible values; no secondary removal of drops into the gas stream occurred. That was confirmed by the results of thermodynamic and CFD modeling. This is a feature of the approach in comparison with those reported in which studies of new design solutions were not comprehensively conducted.

The issues of hydraulic losses and secondary removal of drops into the gas stream remained open. The design solutions proposed in this work affected the separation efficiency – the volume of the selected condensate increased while the total hydraulic losses did not exceed 0.037 MPa. It has been proven that new structural solutions for separation elements provide a more uniform distribution of speeds and form local zones with reduced speeds.

The results are explained by a change in the flow structure, an increase in inertial deposition of drops, and a decrease in low-mobility zones in the flow part of the separation elements. The findings could be implemented in the reconstruction of oil and gas treatment plants, in the design of internal separation elements, and when choosing structural solutions for cyclones in order to purify formation water

Author Biographies

Tetiana Nesterenko, National University «Yuri Kondratyuk Poltava Polytechnic»

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Oil and Gas Engineering and Technology

Ivan Nazarenko, Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor

Department of Machinery and Equipment of Technological Processes

Mykola Nesterenko, National University «Yuri Kondratyuk Poltava Polytechnic»

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Industrial Mechanical Engineering and Mechatronics

Oleksandr Shevchenko, National University «Yuri Kondratyuk Poltava Polytechnic»

PhD Student

Department of Oil and Gas Engineering and Technology

Andrii Khyzhniak, National University «Yuri Kondratyuk Poltava Polytechnic»

Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), Associate Professor

Department of Oil and Gas Engineering and Technology

Iryna Bernyk, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor

Department of Processes and Equipment of Agricultural Production Processing

Artur Onyshchenko, National Transport University

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor

Department of Bridges and Tunnels and Hydrotechnical Structures

Roman Moshkivskyi, National Transport University

PhD Student

Department of Bridges and Tunnels and Hydrotechnical Structures

References

  1. Yang, L., Chen, X., Huang, C., Liu, S., Ning, B., Wang, K. (2024). A review of gas-liquid separation technologies: Separation mechanism, application scope, research status, and development prospects. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 201, 257–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2023.11.057
  2. Yuan, Y. (2024). The Analysis of Gas-liquid Separation Technology Research Progress. E3S Web of Conferences, 528, 01020. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202452801020
  3. Chen, X., Liu, G., Jin, W. (2021). Natural gas purification by asymmetric membranes: An overview. Green Energy & Environment, 6 (2), 176–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gee.2020.08.010
  4. Liu, G., Chernikova, V., Liu, Y., Zhang, K., Belmabkhout, Y., Shekhah, O. et al. (2018). Mixed matrix formulations with MOF molecular sieving for key energy-intensive separations. Nature Materials, 17 (3), 283–289. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-017-0013-1
  5. Liu, G., Cadiau, A., Liu, Y., Adil, K., Chernikova, V., Carja, I. et al. (2018). Enabling Fluorinated MOF‐Based Membranes for Simultaneous Removal of H2S and CO2 from Natural Gas. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 57 (45), 14811–14816. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201808991
  6. Lai, X., Jiang, W., Chen, J., Ru, Y., Hu, W., Wang, S. (2021). Process Simulation Investigation of Purification and Deacidification in Supersonic Separation Process for Natural Gas Treatment. Proceedings of the International Petroleum and Petrochemical Technology Conference 2020, 266–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1123-0_27
  7. Nesterenko, T., Nesterenko, M., Shevchenko, O., Omelchenko, O. (2023). Justification for the Choice of a Modeling Scheme for the Hydrocarbon Preparation Process for Transportation Using Supersonic Separation. Academic Journal Industrial Machine Building Civil Engineering, 2 (61), 86–93. https://doi.org/10.26906/znp.2023.61.3864
  8. James, P. W., Azzopardi, B. J., Wang, Y., Hughes, J. P. (2005). A Model for Liquid Film Flow and Separation in a Wave-Plate Mist Eliminator. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 83 (5), 469–477. https://doi.org/10.1205/cherd.03363
  9. Makowski, Ł., Łaskowski, J., Tyrański, M. (2021). Influence of Modification of the Geometry of the Wave-Plate Mist Eliminators on the Droplet Removal Efficiency – CFD Modelling. Processes, 9 (9), 1499. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9091499
  10. Moiseev, V., Manoilo, E., Liaposhchenko, A., Seif, H. (2020). Oilfield wastewater treatment. Bulletin of the National Technical University «KhPI» Series: New Solutions in Modern Technologies, 4 (6), 122–130. https://doi.org/10.20998/2413-4295.2020.04.18
  11. Li, Z. (2025). Optimization and experimental validation of a high-efficiency oil–water cyclone separator for well testing conditions. Journal of Engineering and Applied Science, 72 (1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s44147-025-00585-0
  12. Nunes, S. A., Magalhães, H. L. F., Gomez, R. S., Vilela, A. F., Figueiredo, M. J., Santos, R. S. et al. (2021). Oily Water Separation Process Using Hydrocyclone of Porous Membrane Wall: A Numerical Investigation. Membranes, 11 (2), 79. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11020079
  13. Simões, A., Macêdo-Júnior, R., Santos, B., Silva, L., Silva, D., Ruzene, D. (2020). Produced Water: An overview of treatment technologies. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 8 (4), 207–224. https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol8.iss4.2283
  14. Khan, H., Lemma, T. A., Soon, W. P. K., Vijayakumaran, H., Marode, R. V. (2025). A Critical Review on the Comprehensive Assessment of Supersonic Separator Technologies for Enhanced Gas Processing and CO2 Removal Efficiency. Results in Engineering, 28, 106923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.106923
  15. Rahimpour, M. R., Makarem, M. A., Meshksar, M. (Eds.) (2024). Advances Natural Gas: Formation, Processing, and Applications. Volume 8: Natural Gas Process Modelling and Simulation. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/c2022-0-00187-2
Substantiating the design of equipment for preparing oil and gas field products for transportation

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30

How to Cite

Nesterenko, T., Nazarenko, I., Nesterenko, M., Shevchenko, O., Khyzhniak, A., Bernyk, I., Onyshchenko, A., & Moshkivskyi, R. (2026). Substantiating the design of equipment for preparing oil and gas field products for transportation. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2(1 (140), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2026.357605

Issue

Section

Engineering technological systems