Dynamic models in the method of project management

Authors

  • Олександр Леонідович Становський Odessa National Polytechnical University Shevchenko 1, Odessa, Ukraine, 65044, Ukraine
  • Катерина Вікторівна Колесникова Odessa National Polytechnical University Shevchenko 1, Odessa, Ukraine, 65044, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6844-1457
  • Олена Юріївна Лєбедєва Odessa National Polytechnical University Shevchenko 1, Odessa, Ukraine, 65044, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3659-1394
  • Ісмаіл Хеблов Odessa National Polytechnical University Shevchenko 1, Odessa, Ukraine, 65044, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0441-473X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2015.55665

Keywords:

project management, synchronization and desynchronization of events, the dynamic model of the project activity, phase portrait

Abstract

The study focuses on the issues connected with the models and methods of managing the projects, programs and other activities within the project portfolio, which allow the support of management decisions when it is necessary to align the resource requests. We consider the possibilities for improving the efficiency of management due to the artificial planned synchronization, desynchronization or self-synchronization of events in the project subsystems.
This can be achieved due to the devised theoretical basis and practical recommendations on constructing the phase dynamic models of the dynamic systems of design activities, which is illustrated by the system of “financial and material supply – current demand of materials”. The self-tuning dynamic system of “project management in the foundry construction” proved to be efficient and gave positive technical results in the implementation of the real project.
It is proven that synchronization and desynchronization are essential parts of those project activities, the exact time of which is impossible to predict and, hence, to plan in advance. The project should provide for the possibility of self-synchronization of the events. The devised method for self-synchronization is based on the concept of the project as a dynamic system, whose attractor is the point of synchronization in the phase portrait. Recommendations on constructing the dynamic models are based on the theoretical foundations of the study of complex systems and the practical experience of planning and implementing the project activities in the construction of industrial facilities.

Author Biographies

Олександр Леонідович Становський, Odessa National Polytechnical University Shevchenko 1, Odessa, Ukraine, 65044

Professor

Department of Oilgas and chemical mechanical engineering

Катерина Вікторівна Колесникова, Odessa National Polytechnical University Shevchenko 1, Odessa, Ukraine, 65044

Doctor of Science

The department of information technology in mechanical engineering

Олена Юріївна Лєбедєва, Odessa National Polytechnical University Shevchenko 1, Odessa, Ukraine, 65044

Master

Department of Oilgas and chemical mechanical engineering

Ісмаіл Хеблов, Odessa National Polytechnical University Shevchenko 1, Odessa, Ukraine, 65044

Master

Department of Oilgas and chemical mechanical engineering

References

  1. Project Management Institute. Available at: http://www.pmi.org/.
  2. Shapiro, V. D., Mazur, I. I., Olderogge, N. G. (2004). Upravlenie proektami. Moscow: Omega-L, 2004, 664.
  3. Gogunskiy, V. D., Stanovskaya, I. I., Gurev I. N. (2013). Problemyi kompleksnoy optimizatsii v upravlenii programmoy sozdaniya odnotipnyih ob'ektov. Informatsiyni tehnologiyi v osviti, nautsi ta vyrobnitstvi. Odesa: AO Bahva, 1 (2), 250–255.
  4. Helmke, U., Pratzelwolters, D., Schmid, S. (1991). Adaptive synchronization of interconnected linear systems. IMA Journal of Mathematical Control and Information, 8 (4). – P. 397–408. doi: 10.1093/imamci/8.4.397
  5. Bushuyev, S. D., Sochnev, S. V. (1999). Entropy measurement as a project control tool. International Journal of Project Management, 17 (6), 343–350.
  6. ISO/TR 10006:1997. Quality Management - Guidelines to quality in project management.
  7. Stanovskiy, A. L., Lyisenko, T. V. (2006). Ispolzovanie muar-effekta pri sinhronizatsii sobyitiy. Trudy Odesskogo politehnicheskogo universiteta, 1 (25), 114–118.
  8. Pecora, L. M. Carroll, T. L. (1990). Synchronization in chaotic systems. Physical Review Letters, 64 (8), 821–832. doi: 10.1103/physrevlett.64.821
  9. Koryachenko, A. A. Stanovskiy, A. L., Schedrov, I. N. (2011). Identifikatsiya skryityih organizatsionnyih narusheniy tehnologii liteynogo proizvodstva. Pratsi Odeskogo. politehnichnogo universytetu, 1 (35), 28–31.
  10. Kozak, Yu. A., Hudenko, N. P. (1999). Mnogokriterialnaya poshagovaya optimizatsiya sistem upravleniya s adaptivnoy variatsiey kriteriev. Trudy Odesskogo politehnicheskogo universiteta, 2, 242–245.
  11. Stanovskiy, A. L., Stanovskaya, I. I., Schedrov, I. N. (2015). Optimizatsiya finansovogo upravleniya multiplikativnyimi riskami. Upravlinnya rozvitkom skladnih sistem, 21, 68–75.
  12. Ramingwong, S., Ramingwong, L. (2009). The Paradoxical Relationships of Risks and Benefits in Offshore Outsourcing of Software Projects. The Open Software Engineering Journal, 3 (2), 35–38. doi: 10.2174/1874107x00903010035
  13. Chernov, S. K. (2006). Uchet riskov i neopredelennostey v organizatsionnyih proektah. Upravlinnya proektami ta rozvitok virobnitstva, 1 (17), 41–44.
  14. Stanovskaya, I. I. Schedrov, I. N. Berezovskaya, E. I. (2015). Profilaktika i upravlenie latentnyimi riskami. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats natsionalnogo universytetu korablebuduvannya, 1, 30–39.
  15. Raykov, A. N. (2008). Intellektualnyie informatsionnyie tehnologii dlya podderzhki sotsialno znachimyih strategicheskih resheniy. Informatsionnoe obschestvo, 5–6, 94–102.
  16. Bondar, A. A., Kostrova, G. V., Lyisenko, T. V. (2009). Metody samosinhronizatsii dinamicheskih protsessov v SAPR liteynogo proizvodstva. Trudy Odesskogo natsyonalnogo politehnicheskogo universiteta, 2 (32), 7–10.
  17. Kostrova, G. V., Bondar, A. A. (2008). Sistema «otlivka – forma» kak ob'ekt avtomatizirovannogo proektirovaniya. Modelirovanie v prikladnyih nauchnyih issledovaniyah. Odessa, 77–78.
  18. Bondar, O. A., Lyisenko, T. V., Stepanenko, G. V. (2010). Metody zabezpechennya samosinhronizatsii livarnih ob’ektiv tehnologichnimi zasobami. Novi materialy i tehnologiyi v mashinobuduvanni. Kyiv: NTUU «KPI», 11–13.

Published

2015-12-24

How to Cite

Становський, О. Л., Колесникова, К. В., Лєбедєва, О. Ю., & Хеблов, І. (2015). Dynamic models in the method of project management. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6(3(78), 46–52. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2015.55665

Issue

Section

Control processes