Selection of preferred routing protocols of wireless sensor and actuator network nodes

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2016.60605

Keywords:

sensor network, routing, selection criteria, energy efficiency, analytic hierarchy process, expert

Abstract

The problems of routing to search for energy efficiency-optimal routes are important in wireless sensor and actuator networks. This determines the relevance of selecting a preferred option among many different routing protocols for a specific implementation. The paper considers the practical features of applying the analytic hierarchy process to select the preferred routing protocol for wireless sensor and actuator networks.

A comparative analysis of the characteristics of existing routing protocols in sensor networks is performed. Experts provided paired comparisons of characteristics of 11 routing protocols. The paired comparison matrices, which allowed computing the eigenvector and priority vector components are formed. According to the maximum values of the priority vector components, the preferred routing protocol - GEAR (Geographical and Energy-Aware Routing) is selected for use in field sensor and actuator networks with localization of elements.

The results confirm the applicability of the analytic hierarchy process to select the preferred routing protocol in the design of sensor and actuator networks taking into account the specified implementation requirements.

Author Biographies

Валерий Михайлович Безрук, Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics 14 Lenina ave., Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61166

Doctor of Technical Sciences, professor, academician of the Ukrainian Academy of Telecommunications, Head of the Department

Department of Communication Networks

Анатолий Николаевич Зеленин, Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics 14 Lenina ave., Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61166

PhD, professor

Department of Communication Networks

Виктория Александровна Власова, Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics 14 Lenina ave., Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61166

PhD, Senior Lecturer

Department of Communication Networks

Юлия Валериевна Скорик, Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics 14 Lenina ave., Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61166

PhD, Assistant

Department of Communication Networks

Юрий Николаевич Колтун, Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics 14 Lenina ave., Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61166

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Communication Networks

References

  1. Baskakov, S. S. (2011). Marshrutizaciya po virtualnym koordinatam v besprovodnyx sensornyx setyax. Avtireferat dissertacii. Moscow, 18.
  2. Ivanenko, V. A. (2011). The analysis of communication protocol from knots in wireless sensor networks. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2/10(50), 9–12. Available at: http://journals.uran.ua/eejet/article/view/1860/1755
  3. Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw Hill, 270.
  4. Bezruk, V., Skorik, Y. (2013). Primenenie metoda analiza ierarxij pri vybore sredstv telekommunikacij s uchetom sovokupnosti pokazatelej kachestva. Radioelektronika i informatika. Kharkiv: Har'kovskij nacional'nyj universitet radiojelektroniki, 24–29.
  5. Villalba, L. J. G., Orozco, A. L. S., Cabrera, A. T., Abbas, C. J. B. (2009). Routing Protocol in Wireless Sensor Networks. Sensors, 9, 8399–8421.
  6. Parvin, Sh., Rahim, M. S. (2008). Routing Protocols for Wireless Sensor Networks: A Comparative Study. International Conference on Electronics, Computer and Communication (ICECC’2008) University of Rajshahi, Bangladesh, 891–894
  7. Juneja, G., Juneja, S. (2012). Performance Analysis of SPIN and LEACH Routing Protocol in WSN. International Journal Of Computational Engineering Research, 2 (5), 1179–1185.
  8. Yu, Y., Estrin, D., Govindan, R. (2001). Geographical and Energy–Aware Routing: A Recursive Data Dissemination Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks. UCLA Computer Science Department Technical Report, UCLA–CSD TR–01–0023.
  9. Sanchez, J., Ruiz, P., Marin-Perez, R. (2009). Beacon-less geographic routing made practical: challenges, design guidelines, and protocols. IEEE Communications Magazine, 47 (8), 85–91. doi: 10.1109/mcom.2009.5181897
  10. Seada, K., Helmy, A. (2008). Geographic Protocols in Sensor Networks. Technical Report 04–837, Computer Science Department, University of Southern California: San Diego, CA, USA.
  11. Bagci, H., Korpeoglu, I. (2009). Distributed and Location-Based Multicast Routing Algorithms for Wireless Sensor Networks. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2009 (1), 697373. doi: 10.1155/2009/697373
  12. Wan, J. (2008). A review of routing protocol in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 40, 8.
  13. Tian, H., Stankovic, J. A., Chenyang, L., Abdelzaher, T. (2003). SPEED: A stateless protocol for real–time communication in sensor networks. 23rd International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, 46–55. doi: 10.1109/icdcs.2003.1203451
  14. Lin, J., Liu, Y., Ni, L. M. (2007). SIDA: Self–organized ID Assignment in Wireless Sensor Networks. 2007 IEEE Internatonal Conference on Mobile Adhoc and Sensor Systems, 1–8. doi: 10.1109/mobhoc.2007.4428604
  15. Yu, X., Wu, P., Han, W., Zhang, Z. (2013). A survey on wireless sensor network infrastructure for agriculture. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 35 (1), 59–64. doi: 10.1016/j.csi.2012.05.001
  16. Bezruk, V. M., Ponomarenko, N. N., Skorik, Y. V. (2015). Analiz effektivnosti metodov mnogokriterial'nogo vybora predpochtitel'nogo varianta sredstv telekommunikacij. Problemi telekomunіkacіj, 1 (16), 42–53. Available at: http://pt.journal.kh.ua/2015/1/1/151_bezruk_analysis.pdf

Downloads

Published

2016-02-27

How to Cite

Безрук, В. М., Зеленин, А. Н., Власова, В. А., Скорик, Ю. В., & Колтун, Ю. Н. (2016). Selection of preferred routing protocols of wireless sensor and actuator network nodes. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1(9(79), 4–9. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2016.60605

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 9(79) (2016): Information and controlling system

Section

Information and controlling system

License

Copyright (c) 2016 Анатолий Николаевич Зеленин, Валерий Михайлович Безрук, Виктория Александровна Власова, Юлия Валериевна Скорик, Юрий Николаевич Колтун

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.

A license agreement is a document in which the author warrants that he/she owns all copyright for the work (manuscript, article, etc.).
The authors, signing the License Agreement with TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC, have all rights to the further use of their work, provided that they link to our edition in which the work was published.
According to the terms of the License Agreement, the Publisher TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC does not take away your copyrights and receives permission from the authors to use and dissemination of the publication through the world's scientific resources (own electronic resources, scientometric databases, repositories, libraries, etc.).
In the absence of a signed License Agreement or in the absence of this agreement of identifiers allowing to identify the identity of the author, the editors have no right to work with the manuscript.
It is important to remember that there is another type of agreement between authors and publishers – when copyright is transferred from the authors to the publisher. In this case, the authors lose ownership of their work and may not use it in any way.