Development of information technology for operational control of agricultural production

Authors

  • Aleksandr Grinchak Uman National University of Horticulture 1 Institutska str., Uman, Ukraine, 20305, Ukraine
  • Olena Davletkhanova Uman National University of Horticulture 1 Institutska str., Uman, Ukraine, 20305, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5131-2800
  • Yaroslav Mykolaіchuk Uman National University of Horticulture 1 Institutska str., Uman, Ukraine, 20305, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3475-4658

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2016.65476

Keywords:

operational control, information technology, dashboard, Microsoft Excel, plant growing, selection of a machine-tractor unit, flowchart, economic benefit

Abstract

The study suggests a method of improving operational control at an agricultural enterprise in terms of informational support. The method involves dynamic and interactive information analysis panels (dashboards) as an instrument of information analysis support in choosing an optimal real-time solution by the work performer. The suggested approach was developed into a definite improvement pattern for production management at enterprises through introduction of modern information technologies; today it can be already implemented at existing farms. The study provides dashboards for selecting a machine-tractor unit by performance indicators and for building “A flowchart for performing a technological operation,” both implemented in the medium of a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet.

The suggested interactive dynamic dashboards in the operational management of agricultural production facilitate rapid re-planning of technological operations by the work performer in real time, significantly reducing the time spent on the necessary calculations and improving their quality. It furthermore produces beneficial effects on the efficiency of production process control at enterprises. The results of evaluating the economic benefits of using the suggested dashboard technology in the operational management of agricultural production indicate an expediency of its implementation by an agricultural enterprise at the operational control level.

Author Biographies

Aleksandr Grinchak, Uman National University of Horticulture 1 Institutska str., Uman, Ukraine, 20305

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Economic Cybernetics and Information Systems

Olena Davletkhanova, Uman National University of Horticulture 1 Institutska str., Uman, Ukraine, 20305

Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate

Department of Economic Cybernetics and Information Systems

Yaroslav Mykolaіchuk, Uman National University of Horticulture 1 Institutska str., Uman, Ukraine, 20305

Department of Economic Cybernetics and Information Systems

References

  1. Alexander, M., Walkenbach, J. (2013). Excel Dashboards and Reports. Hoboken: Wiley Publishing Inc., 434.
  2. AuCoin, M. (2012). Microsoft Dynamics CRM 2011: Dashboards Cookbook. Birmingham: Packt Publishing Ltd., 248.
  3. Polino, M. (2013). Building Dashboards with Microsoft Dynamics GP 2013 and Excel 2013. Birmingham: Packt Publishing, 268.
  4. Zhang, L., Stoffel, A., Behrisch, M., Mittelstadt, S., Schreck, T., Pompl, R. et. al. (2012). Visual analytics for the big data era – A comparative review of state-of-the-art commercial systems. 2012 IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST), 173–182. doi: 10.1109/vast.2012.6400554
  5. Nourry, M. (2008). Measuring sustainable development: Some empirical evidence for France from eight alternative indicators. Ecological Economics, 67, 441–456.
  6. Tutunea, M., Rus, R. (2012) Business Intelligence Solutions for SME's. Procedia Economics and Finance, 3, 865–870. doi: 10.1016/s2212-5671(12)00242-0
  7. Flood, M., Lemieux, V., Varga, M., Wong, W. (2016). The Application of Visual Analytics to Financial Stability Monitoring. Journal of Financial Stability, 50. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2438194
  8. Sarli, P. (2016). Macroprudential oversight, risk communication and visualization. Journal of Financial Stability, 40. doi: 10.1016/j.jfs.2015.12.005
  9. Tolonen, A., Shahmarichatghieh, M., Harkonen, J., Haapasalo, H. (2015). Product portfolio management – Targets and key performance indicators for product portfolio renewal over life cycle. International Journal of Production Economics, 170, 468–477. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.05.034
  10. Davletkhanova, O. Kh., Mykolaichuk, Ya. L. (2014). Cost-effectiveness analysis of the farm management system. Naukovyi ohliad, 10 (9), 5–12.
  11. Grinchak, O. V., Mykolaichuk, Ya. L. (2012). Teoretyko-metodolohichni aspekty informatsiinoho zabezpechennia operatyvnoho upravlinnia silskohospodarskym vyrobnytstvom. Ekonomichnyi analiz, 11 (4), 223–227.
  12. Butler, M., Herlihy, P., Keenan, P. B. (2005). Integrating information technology and operational research in the management of milk collection. Journal of Food Engineering, 70 (3), 341–349. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2004.02.046
  13. Zubko, V. M. (2013). The technology and techno-ekonomik evaluation of machine aggregate in the performance communiti monitor soil. Visnyk KhNTUSH, 135, 32–39.
  14. Ilchenko, V. Yu., Kobets, A. S., Melnyk, V. P., Karasov, P. I., Kukharenko, P. M., Ilchenko, A. V. (2002). Praktykum z vykorystannia mashyn u roslynnytstvi DDAU, 212.
  15. Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int. J. Services Sciences, 1, 83–89.

Published

2016-04-22

How to Cite

Grinchak, A., Davletkhanova, O., & Mykolaіchuk Y. (2016). Development of information technology for operational control of agricultural production. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2(2(80), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2016.65476