A method developed to increase technological and ecological efficiency of gas production from hydrate deposits





gas hydrate deposits, marine hydrates, extraction of methane, hydrogen sulphide, carbon dioxide recycling


Despite some international experience in gas production from gas hydrate deposits, mining companies are faced with a number of issues that have not been resolved so far. Among these issues, the particularly complex ones are technological problems and environmental efficiency. In the present article, there is a substantiation of the need to consider the particular structure of primary (marine) and secondary (land) gas hydrate deposits while choosing the method of extracting gas from them.

The analysis of the practical experience of extracting gas from gas hydrate deposits has proved that one of the most effective methods of ecological production of methane from marine gas hydrate deposits might be the method of substitution. The method of decompression (reduced pressure) is the most effective one for development of secondary (land) deposits.

The suggested method of technological planes has helped estimate the effectiveness of using hydrate substitutes such as hydrogen sulphide and carbon dioxide. This method has proved a certain advantage of hydrogen sulphide over carbon dioxide due to a larger conventional area of the technological plane and, therefore, a safer range of values of the technological parameters of gas extraction.

The obtained results can be used in implementing the technology of gas extraction from hydrate deposits, especially in applying the substitution method to developing offshore deposits.

Author Biographies

Sergiy Oveckiy, Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas Karpatska str., 15, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine, 76019

PhD, associate professor

Department of Oil and Gas Field Development and Operation

Vladyslav Savchuk, Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas Karpatska str., 15, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine, 76019

Department ofOil and Gas Field Development and Operation


  1. Makogon, Y. F., Holditch, S. A., Makogon, T. Y. (2007). Natural gas-hydrates – A potential energy source for the 21st Century. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 56 (1-3), 14–31. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2005.10.009
  2. Kvamme, B., Kuznetsova, T., Sapate, A., Qorbani, K. (2016). Thermodynamic implications of adding N2 to CO2 for production of CH4 from hydrates. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering. doi: 10.1016/j.jngse.2016.03.095
  3. Archer, D., Buffett, B., Brovkin, V. (2008). Ocean methane hydrates as a slow tipping point in the global carbon cycle. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106 (49), 20596–20601. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0800885105
  4. Femyak, Y. M., Vytyaz, О. Yu., Yakimechko, Y. Y., Oveckiі, S. О. (2014). Gazogidraty Cheornogo morya. Offshore, 3, 16–20.
  5. Zhang, H.-t., Zhu, Y.-h. (2011). Survey and research on gashydrate in permafrost region of China. Regional Geology of China, 12, 1809–1815.
  6. Bi, Y., Chen, J., Miao, Z. (2016). Thermodynamic optimization for dissociation process of gas hydrates. Energy, 106, 270–276. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.03.029
  7. Chong, Z. R., Yang, S. H. B., Babu, P., Linga, P., Li, X.-S. (2016). Review of natural gas hydrates as an energy resource: Prospects and challenges. Applied Energy, 162, 1633–1652. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.12.061
  8. Yamamoto, K. (2015). Overview and introduction: Pressure core-sampling and analyses in the 2012–2013 MH21 offshore test of gas production from methane hydrates in the eastern Nankai Trough. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 66, 296–309. doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2015.02.024
  9. Ryu, B.-J., Riedeland, M., Collett, T. S. (Eds.) (2013). Collett Scientific Results of the Second Gas Hydrate Drilling Expedition in the Ulleung Basin (UBGH2), East Sea of Korea. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 47, 1–302.
  10. Vedachalam, N., Srinivasalu, S., Rajendran, G., Ramadass, G. A., Atmanand, M. A. (2015). Review of unconventional hydrocarbon resources in major energy consuming countries and efforts in realizing natural gas hydrates as a future source of energy. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 26, 163–175. doi: 10.1016/j.jngse.2015.06.008
  11. Chen, J., Wang, Y.-H., Lang, X.-M., Fan, S.-S. (2015). Energy-efficient methods for production methane from natural gas hydrates. Journal of Energy Chemistry, 24 (5), 552–558. doi: 10.1016/j.jechem.2015.08.014
  12. Deusner, C., Bigalke, N., Kossel, E., Haeckel, M. (2012). Methane Production from Gas Hydrate Deposits through Injection of Supercritical CO2. Energies, 5 (12), 2112–2140. doi: 10.3390/en5072112
  13. Vytyaz, О. Yu., Oveckiі, S. О., Femyak, Y. M., Todorchuk, А. F., Say, К. S. (2014). Patent № u 201405395 na korysnu model’. Sposib intensyfikacii vydobuvannia metanu z tverdykh gazovykh gidrativ piddonogo zalyagannia z zakriplenniam, Ukraine, MPK Е21В43/00, 5.
  14. Dallimore, S. R., Yamamoto, K., Wright, F. (2010). Four decades of gas hydrate research and development at Mallik site, Mackenzie Delta, Northwestern Territories, Canada. Presentation held at the 'International Symposium on Methane Hydrate Resources – from Mallik to Nankai Trough' in Tokyo.
  15. Vytyaz, О. Yu., Oveckiі, S. О., Femyak, Y. M., Todorchuk, А. F., Levchenko, V. S. (2014). Patent № u 201405379 na korysnu model’. Sposib vydobuvannia metanu z tverdykh gazovykh gidrativ. Ukraine, MPK Е21В43/00, 5.
  16. Pavlenko, A., Košlak, G., Vitâz’, O. (2014). Study of the stability of methane hydrates in normal conditions. Drill, 31 (4), 495–507. doi: 10.7494/drill.2014.31.4.495




How to Cite

Oveckiy, S., & Savchuk, V. (2016). A method developed to increase technological and ecological efficiency of gas production from hydrate deposits. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 3(10(81), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2016.72545