Development of executive system architecture of the converting class

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2016.74873

Keywords:

system, converting system, coordination subsystem, control subsystem, registration subsystem

Abstract

The issue of the control purpose achievement and the related issue of optimization of technological processes are closely connected with development of the architecture of the controlled system. So, the structural optimization problem solution can lead to such architectural concept at which the solution of the problem of parametrical optimization becomes impossible in principle. Complexity of the solution of similar problems consists in the fact that for today there is no standard idea of what is a “system”, “controlled system”, “simple system”, “complex system”, etc. That is, the issue of what is generally considered as a system is conceptually unresolved.

Therefore, the reference point, as a standard of a system, were the following postulates: all functions of an object have to be carried out automatically, the received object has to provide interactive interaction with other objects, the object has to carry out only one basic technological function (heating, crushing, movement, sorting, etc.).

For testing the operability of architectural concepts, a specially developed program designer was used. As the result of research, the internal structure of a single-product system of the converting type has been developed. The entire set of the interconnected mechanisms is presented in the form of five subsystems. Each subsystem carries out the intrasystem function. Definition is given to a system of the converting type and its subsystems.

The use of the offered architecture of the converting system creation allows using the block principle of systems creation of this class. Besides, such principle of allocation of subsystems makes them robust as at failures in the functioning of the registration and optimization subsystems they can be disconnected. At the same time, the loss of optimizing opportunities won't lead to the loss of operability of another part of the system and the entire system environment.

Author Biographies

Igor Lutsenko, M. Ostrogradskii Kremenchug national unіversitet Pervomayskaya str., 20, Kremenchug, Ukraine, 39600

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor

Department of Electronic Devices 

 

Elena Fomovskaya, M. Ostrogradskii Kremenchug national unіversitet Pervomayskaya str., 20, Kremenchug, Ukraine, 39600

PhD, Associate Professor, Head of Department

Department of Electronic Devices

Olga Serdiuk, SIHE «Kryvyi Rih National University» XXII Partz’yizdu str., 11, Kryvyi Rih, Ukraine, 50027

Department of computer systems and networks

References

  1. Vahranev, I. B. (2007). Metodika postroeniya arhitekturyi informatsionnyih sistem. Izvestiya Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo tehnicheskogo universiteta, 9 (3), 74–81.
  2. Zvonarev, D. A. (2011). Upravlenie mobilnyim robotom s elektricheskim dvigatelem. Izvestiya Tulskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Tehnicheskie nauki, 2, 368–372.
  3. Menyaev, M. F. (2011). Informatsionnyie potoki v sisteme upravleniya. Nauka i obrazovanie, 5, 1–10.
  4. Magdanov, P. V. (2012). Sistema upravleniya organizatsiey: ponyatie i opredelenie. Vestnik OGU, 8 (144), 56–62.
  5. Gorbashko, E. A., Filatova, T. A. (2013). Sovershenstvovanie sistemyi upravleniya kachestvom uslug servisnoy organizatsii. Izvestiya Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta ekonomiki i finansov, 3, 42–46.
  6. Hanova, I. M. (2014). Optimizatsiya zatrat cherez sovershenstvovanie sistemyi upravleniya zatratami. Austrian Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2 (1-2), 170–180.
  7. Kirillova, L. N. (2009). Vidyi pribyili v sisteme upravleniya pribyilyu. Ekonomicheskiy zhurnal, 16, 57–76.
  8. Lavrenyuk, O. V. (2011). Opisanie kompyuternogo simulyatora dlya sistemyi upravleniya dohodami aviakompanii. Izvestiya Rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta imeni A. I. Gertsena, 141, 75–80.
  9. Silva Lopez, H. H., Medina Tanco, G. A., Cruz, S. L. (2014). Low-voltage Power Supply Subsystem for a Sub-Orbital Particle Physic Instrument. Advances in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 12 (3), 226–244. doi: 10.15598/aeee.v12i3.1074
  10. Jarre, A., Ragaller, S. M., Hutchings, L. (2013). Long-term, Ecosystem-Scale Changes in the Southern Benguela Marine Pelagic Social-Ecological System: Interaction of Natural and Human Drivers. Ecology and Society, 18 (4). doi: 10.5751/es-05917-180455
  11. Balezina, E. A. (2013). Covremennyiy vzglyad na teorii modernizatsii. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta, 1 (13), 156–161.
  12. Shreyder, Yu. A., Sharov, A. A. (1982). Sistemyi i modeli. Moscow: Radio i svyaz, 152.
  13. Lutsenko, I. (2014). Systems engineering of optimal control. Synthesis of the structure of the technological products conversion system (Part 1). Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6/2 (72), 29–37. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2014.28724
  14. Lutsenko, I., Fomovskaya, E., Vihrova, E., Serdiuk, O. (2016). Development of system operations models hierarchy on the aggregating sign of system mechanisms. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 3/2 (81), 39–46. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2016.71494
  15. Lutsenko, I., Fomovskaya, E. (2015). Identification of target system operations. 4. The practice of determining the optimal control. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6/2 (78), 30–36. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2015.54432

Downloads

Published

2016-08-30

How to Cite

Lutsenko, I., Fomovskaya, E., & Serdiuk, O. (2016). Development of executive system architecture of the converting class. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 4(2(82), 50–58. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2016.74873