Developing a user-oriented approach to selection of geospatial data based on fuzzy logic




geo-information systems, information provision, geo-spatial data, quality evaluation, fuzzy logic


The work considers the approach to selection of geospatial data, oriented towards the user's requirements. The methods and models are presented for evaluation of quality and selection of the sets of spatial data with the aid of fuzzy logic.

The model of evaluation of the quality of spatial data was designed, which fully agrees with the elements of quality of a series of the international standards ISO 19157. The model makes it possible to comprehensively consider the requirements of user in the selection of spatial data for the formation of information provision of GIS–applications. Within the framework of the model, the methods of selection of spatial data according to the indicators of thematic and positioning accuracy were developed. The method of thematic accuracy is realized under conditions of the lack of the reference cartographic material. The method of selection of spatial data according to the indicator of positioning accuracy provides for the possibility of correcting an error of the planned and high-altitude accuracy and presents the result in the form of expert recommendations. Furthermore, this approach is realized in the prototype of a system, which makes it possible for the users to consider their requirements in conjunction with the indicators of quality of geospatial data. This system allows forming information provision of GIS-applications, and its verification in several projects of different thematics demonstrated positive results of taking onto account the needs of users at the stage of selecting the data.

Author Biographies

Ganna Bielcheva, Kharkiv National University of radio Electronics Nauka ave., 14, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61166

PhD, assistant

Department of Media Systems and Technologies

Nataliia Manakova, O. M. Beketov National University of urban economy in Kharkiv Marshala Baganova str., 17, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61002

PhD, Assosiate Professor, Head of Department

Department of Applied Mathematics and Information Technology

Nataliia Makogon, O. M. Beketov National University of urban economy in Kharkiv Marshala Baganova str., 17, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61002


Department of Applied Mathematics and Information Technology


  1. Wilson, M. W. (2015). On the criticality of mapping practices: Geodesign as critical GIS? Landscape and Urban Planning, 142, 226–234. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.12.017
  2. Li, S., Dragicevic, S., Castro, F. A., Sester, M., Winter, S., Coltekin, A. et. al. (2016). Geospatial big data handling theory and methods: A review and research challenges. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 115, 119–133. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2015.10.012
  3. SOU 742–33739540 0010:2010. Kompleks standartіv. Baza topografіchnih danih. Zagal'nі vimogi (2010). Kyiv: Mіnprirodi Ukrainy, 27.
  4. Vymogy do struktury, zmistu ta formatu oformlennja rezul'tativ robit iz zemleustroju v elektronnomu vygljadi (obminnogo fajlu): nakaz Derzh. komitetu Ukrai'ny iz zemel'nyh resursiv № 573 vid 02.11.2009 (2010). Oficijnyj visnyk Ukrai'ny, 12.
  5. ISO/TS 19104:2008. Geographic information – Terminology (2008). Switzerland: ISO, 102. Available at:
  6. ISO 19115:2014. Geographic information – Metadata. Part 1: Fundamentals (2014). Switzerland: ISO, 167. Available at:
  7. ISO 19157:2013. Geographic information – Data quality (2013). Switzerland: ISO, 146. Available at:
  8. Ariza-López, F. J., Rodríguez-Avi, J. (2015). Using International Standards to Control the Positional Quality of Spatial Data. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 81 (8), 657–668. doi: 10.14358/pers.81.8.657
  9. Denham, R., Mengersen, K., Witte, C. (2009). Bayesian analysis of thematic map accuracy data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 113 (2), 371–379. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2008.10.008
  10. Docan, D. C. (2013). Spatial Data Quality Assessment in GIS. Antalya, 105–112.
  11. Farnood Ahmadi, F., Ebadi, H. (2014). Using cognitive information in the expert interface system for intelligent structuring and quality control of spatial data measured from photogrammetric or remotely sensed images. Measurement, 48, 167–172. doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2013.10.019
  12. Stehman, S. V., Wickham, J. D. (2011). Pixels, blocks of pixels, and polygons: Choosing a spatial unit for thematic accuracy assessment. Remote Sensing of Environment, 115 (12), 3044–3055. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2011.06.007
  13. Kalantari, M., Rajabifard, A., Olfat, H., Williamson, I. (2014). Geospatial Metadata 2.0 – An approach for Volunteered Geographic Information. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 48, 35–48. doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2014.06.005
  14. Bel'cheva, A. V., Manakov, V. P., Manakova, N. O. (2011). Teorija igr i raschet pokazatelej jeffektivnosti dannyh. Radiojelektronika i informatika, 1 (52), 87–89.
  15. Bel'cheva, A. V., Manakova, N. O. (2011). Fuzzy sets and calculation accuracy of digital maps. Eastern-European Journal Of Enterprise Technologies, 3/2 (51), 29–32. Available at:




How to Cite

Bielcheva, G., Manakova, N., & Makogon, N. (2016). Developing a user-oriented approach to selection of geospatial data based on fuzzy logic. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 4(3(82), 38–45.



Control processes