Definition of efficiency indicator and study of its main function as an optimization criterion
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2016.85453Keywords:
efficiency indicator, optimization criterion, comparison criterion, resources efficiencyAbstract
The problem of development rates maximizing of any business structure is solved by system processes optimization, and the best choice taking from a set of available alternatives. In order to solve these problems, an indicator that can be trusted to a central place in the technology of the optimum solutions is needed. Especially it is urgent where full automation of control processes is necessary. This responsibility involves the careful selection and verification of the indicators claiming to be the optimization criterion. According to the retrospective analysis, in this issue it is possible to allocate two interconnected problems.
The first problem is an uncertainty of the “optimization” concept. In fact, the optimization process, for today, is associated with extremum search of some function. In this regard, the second problem is related to the fact that as an optimization criterion, forming the function, it is proposed to use a variety of indicators.
In this work the essence of an efficiency indicator is revealed. The structure of this indicator and the properties which such indicator has to possess are defined. A number of classes of reference operations were created. Each such class provides a possibility of testing those qualities which the efficiency indicator applying for a role of optimization criterion has to possess.
The indicator which has cybernetic structure and successfully passed test on all classes of reference operations has been developed. Results of use of the developed indicator as optimization criterion in the system of liquid portion heating have been given.
Definition for category “efficiency” and “efficiency indicator” has been given.
The received results can be useful to developers of cross-disciplinary indicators, specialists in control processes automation and business processes optimization.
References
- Healey, C. M., Andradóttir, S., Kim, S.-H. (2013). Efficient comparison of constrained systems using dormancy. European Journal of Operational Research, 224 (2), 340–352. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2012.08.012
- Syntetos, A. A., Kholidasari, I., Naim, M. M. (2016). The effects of integrating management judgement into OUT levels: In or out of context? European Journal of Operational Research, 249 (3), 853–863. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.07.021
- Singh, R., Kumar, H., Singla, R. K. (2014). TOPSIS Based Multi-Criteria Decision Making of Feature Selection Techniques for Network Traffic Dataset. International Journal of Engineering and Technology (IJET), 5 (6), 4598–4604.
- Miskowicz, M. (2010). Efficiency of Event-Based Sampling According to Error Energy Criterion. Sensors, 10 (3), 2242–2261. doi: 10.3390/s100302242
- Anishchenka, U. V., Kryuchkov, A. N., Kul’bak, L. I., Martinovich, T. S. (2008). Optimization of the structure of multifunctional information systems according to the criterion of a required value of the efficiency ratio. Automatic Control and Computer Sciences, 42 (4), 203–209. doi: 10.3103/s0146411608040068
- Zhao, Q., Ding, Y., Jin, H. (2011). A Layout Optimization Method of Composite Wing Structures Based on Carrying Efficiency Criterion. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 24 (4), 425–433. doi: 10.1016/s1000-9361(11)60050-2
- Vasilyev, E. S. (2013). Optimization of the architecture of a charge pump device on the basis of the energy efficiency criterion. Journal of Communications Technology and Electronics, 58 (1), 95–99. doi: 10.1134/s1064226913010099
- Harchenko, V. P., Babeychuk, D. G., Slyunyaev, O. S. (2009). Optimization of network information air navigation facilities by the generalized criterion of efficiency. Proceedings of National Aviation University, 38 (1), 3–5. doi: 10.18372/2306-1472.38.1650
- Vasilyev, E. S. (2013). Optimization of the architecture of a charge pump device on the basis of the energy efficiency criterion. Journal of Communications Technology and Electronics, 58 (1), 95–99. doi: 10.1134/s1064226913010099
- Wu, Y., Cheng, T. C. E. (2006). Henig efficiency of a multi-criterion supply-demand network equilibrium model. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2 (3), 269–286. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2006.2.269
- Anishchenka, U. V., Kryuchkov, A. N., Kul’bak, L. I., Martinovich, T. S. (2008). Optimization of the structure of multifunctional information systems according to the criterion of a required value of the efficiency ratio. Automatic Control and Computer Sciences, 42 (4), 203–209. doi: 10.3103/s0146411608040068
- Xu, Q., Wehrle, E., Baier, H. (2012). Adaptive surrogate-based design optimization with expected improvement used as infill criterion. Optimization, 61 (6), 661–684. doi: 10.1080/02331934.2011.644286
- Xia, L. (2016). Optimization of Markov decision processes under the variance criterion. Automatica, 73, 269–278. doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2016.06.018
- Mansour, M. R., Delbem, A. C. B., Alberto, L. F. C., Ramos, R. A. (2015). Integrating Hierarchical Clustering and Pareto-Efficiency to Preventive Controls Selection in Voltage Stability Assessment. Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization, 487–497. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-15892-1_33
- Shorikov, A. F., Rassadina, E. S. (2010). Multi-criterion optimization of production range generation by an enterprise. Economy of Region, 2, 189–196. doi: 10.17059/2010-2-18
- Savchuk, T. O., Kozachuk, A. V. (2015). Development of cloud application efficiency evaluation criterion. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5 (2 (77)), 20–26. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2015.50950
- Lutsenko, I., Fomovskaya, E., Vikhrova, E., Serdiuk, O. (2016). Development of system operations models hierarchy on the aggregating sign of system mechanisms. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 3 (2 (81)), 39–46. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2016.71494
- Lutsenko, I., Fomovskaya, E. (2015). Identification of target system operations. 4. The practice of determining the optimal control. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6 (2 (78)), 30–36. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2015.54432
- Lutsenko, I., Vihrova, E., Fomovskaya, E., Serdiuk, O. (2016). Development of the method for testing of efficiency criterion of models of simple target operations. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2 (4 (80)), 42–50. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2016.66307
- Cirlin, A. M. (1986) Optimal'noe upravlenie tehnologicheskimi processami. Jenergoatomizdat, 400.
- Lutsenko, I. (2014). Identification of target system operations. Determination of the time of the actual completion of the target operation. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6 (2 (72)), 42–47. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2014.28040
- Lutsenko, I. (2015). Identification of target system operations. determination of the value of the complex costs of the target operation. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1 (2 (73)), 31–36. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2015.35950
- Lutsenko, I. (2015). Identification of target system operations. development of global efficiency criterion of target operations. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2 (2 (74)), 35–40. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2015.38963
- Bartuševičienė, I., Šakalytė, E. (2013) Organizational Assessment: Effectiveness VS. Efficiency. Social Transformations in Contemporary Society. Available at: http://stics.mruni.eu/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/45-53.pdf
- Lutsenko, I. (2016). Principles of cybernetic systems interaction, their definition and classification. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5 (2 (83)), 37–44. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2016.79356
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Игорь Анатольевич Луценко
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.
A license agreement is a document in which the author warrants that he/she owns all copyright for the work (manuscript, article, etc.).
The authors, signing the License Agreement with TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC, have all rights to the further use of their work, provided that they link to our edition in which the work was published.
According to the terms of the License Agreement, the Publisher TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC does not take away your copyrights and receives permission from the authors to use and dissemination of the publication through the world's scientific resources (own electronic resources, scientometric databases, repositories, libraries, etc.).
In the absence of a signed License Agreement or in the absence of this agreement of identifiers allowing to identify the identity of the author, the editors have no right to work with the manuscript.
It is important to remember that there is another type of agreement between authors and publishers – when copyright is transferred from the authors to the publisher. In this case, the authors lose ownership of their work and may not use it in any way.