Organization of responsibility accounting of city electric transport enterprises’ activity

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2018.126178

Keywords:

mathematical model of quality, management decisions, transport efficiency, responsibility centers

Abstract

The problems of organization of responsibility accounting of the city electric transport (CET) enterprises' activity are considered. The industry specifics of the activity of tram and trolleybus enterprises are determined. It is substantiated that the organizational and methodical structure of accounting of the CET enterprises’ activity is influenced by factors of the internal and external environment. These include state regulation of the industry, peculiarities in relations with customers, the specific nature of the products and technological peculiarities of structural units.

The mathematical model of quality of service of transport enterprise customers on the basis of the verified resource efficiency indicator is developed.

Such a step will allow linking the rating efficiency of transport routes with the problems of structural optimization when choosing the priorities in the maintenance of vehicles. In addition, the developed model allows evaluating the fulfillment of the route schedule, which will increase the confidence of passengers in city transport and increase passenger traffic.

Thus, the proposed solution allows increasing the efficiency of passenger transport by improving the quality of service within the existing budget.

Author Biographies

Iryna Nykyforak, Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University Kotsyubynsky str., 2, Chernivtsi, Ukraine, 58012

PhD

Department of Accounting, Analysis and Audit

Nataliya Duhanets, State Agrarian and Engineering University of Podilya Shevchenka str., 13, Kamianets-Podilsky, Ukraine, 32300

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Accounting and Taxation

Yevheniia Kobrusieva, Oles Honchar Dnipro National University Gagarina ave., 72, Dnipro, Ukraine, 49010

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Administrative and Criminal Law

References

  1. Grenier, A., Page, S. (2012). The impact of electrified transport on local grid infrastructure: A comparison between electric cars and light rail. Energy Policy, 49, 355–364. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.06.033
  2. Mahony, A. O., Doran, J. (2008). The changing role of management accountants; evidence from the implementation of EPR system in large organizations. International journal of business and management, 3 (8), 109–115. doi: 10.5539/ijbm.v3n8p109
  3. Ahid, M., Augustine, A. (2012). The roles and responsibilities of management accounting in era of globalization. Global journal of management and business research, 12 (15), 43–53.
  4. Horngren, Ch. T., Foster, D. (1995). Cost accounting: a managerial emphasis. New Gersey: Prentice-Hall.
  5. Safa, M. (2012). Examining the role of resposibility accounting in organizational structure. American academic and scholarly research journal, 4 (5).
  6. Zimnicki, T. (2017). Responsibility accounting inspiration for segment reporting. Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting, 5 (2), 219–232. doi: 10.12775/cjfa.2016.024
  7. Ocansey, E., Enahoro, J. (2012). Determinant controllability of responsibility accounting in profit planning. Canadian social science, 8 (6), 91–95.
  8. Ciuhureanu, A. T. (2012). The dualism of the accounting activity of the company. Annals of the University of Petrosani. Economics, 12 (2), 93–104.
  9. Grzelec, K., Birr, K. (2016). Development of trolleybus public transportation as part of a sustainable mobility strategy. Scientific Journal of Silesian University of technology. Series transport, 92, 53–63. doi: 10.20858/sjsutst.2016.92.6
  10. Tica, E., Filipovich, S., Zivanovich, P., Bajchetic, S. (2011). Development of trolleybus passenger transport subsystem in terms of sustainable development and quality of life in cities. International Journal for traffic and transport engineering, 1 (4), 196–205.
  11. Dymchenko, O. V., Krudu, A. S. (2014). Substantiation of development tendencies of city electric transport enterprises in the context of euro integration processes in Ukraine. Komunal'ne hospodarstvo mist, 113, 3–9.
  12. Palant, O. Yu. (2014). System effectiveness of work of public electric transport. Innovatsiyna ekonomika, 6, 87–93.
  13. Blank, I. A. (1998). Upravlenie pribyl'yu [Income management]. Kyiv: Nika-Centr, 544.
  14. The Law of Ukraine “On public electric transport”: Zakon Ukrainy vid 29.06.2004 No. 1914-IV. Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. Available at: http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1914-15
  15. Zvedenyi zvit osnovnykh pokaznykiv pro robotu miskoho elektrotransportu Ukrainy za 2017 rik. Korporatsiya miskoho elektrotransportu «Ukrelektrotrans». Available at: http://korpmet.org.ua/?page_id=48
  16. The order of forming of tariffs is on services of public electric transport (tram, trolleybus): Nakaz Ministerstva infrastruktury Ukrainy vid 25.11.2013 No. 940. Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. Available at: http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z2035-13
  17. Pushkar, M. S. (2007). Stvorennia intelektual'noi systemy obliku [Creating an intelligent accounting system]. Ternopil: Kart-blansh, 152.
  18. Napadovska, L. V. (2000). Upravlinskyi oblik [Managerial accounting]. Dnipropetrovsk: Nauka i osvita, 450.
  19. Eierle, B., Schultze, W. (2013). The role of management as a user of accounting information: implications for standard setting. Accounting and Management Information Systems, 12 (2), 155–189.
  20. Osaretin Kingsley, A., Omimi-Ejoor, Endurance, O., Sunny, A. I., E. Ozele, C. (2014). Responsibility Accounting: An Overview. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 16 (1), 73–79. doi: 10.9790/487x-16147379
  21. Kaliuha, Ye. V. (2002). Finansovo-hospodarskyi kontrol u systemi upravlinnia [Financially economic control in the management system]. Kyiv: Elha, Nika-Tsentr, 360.
  22. Goreev, A. E. (2012). K voprosu ob ekonomicheskoy effektivnosti gorodskogo passazhirskogo transporta. Transport RF, 3-4, 34–36.
  23. Lutsenko, I. (2015). Identification of target system operations. Development of global efficiency criterion of target operations. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2 (2 (74)), 35–40. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2015.38963
  24. Lutsenko, I. (2016). Definition of efficiency indicator and study of its main function as an optimization criterion. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6 (2 (84)), 24–32. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2016.85453
  25. Lutsenko, I., Vihrova, E., Fomovskaya, E., Serduik, O. (2016). Development of the method for testing of efficiency criterion of models of simple target operations. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2 (4 (80)), 42–50. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2016.66307
  26. Lutsenko, I., Fomovskaya, E., Oksanych, I., Vikhrova, E., Serdiuk, О. (2017). Formal signs determination of efficiency assessment indicators for the operation with the distributed parameters. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1 (4 (85)), 24–30. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2017.91025
  27. Lutsenko, I., Fomovskaya, E., Oksanych, I., Koval, S., Serdiuk, О. (2017). Development of a verification method of estimated indicators for their use as an optimization criterion. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2 (4 (86)). P. 17–23. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2017.95914

Downloads

Published

2018-03-16

How to Cite

Nykyforak, I., Duhanets, N., & Kobrusieva, Y. (2018). Organization of responsibility accounting of city electric transport enterprises’ activity. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2(3 (92), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2018.126178

Issue

Section

Control processes