Determining the efficiency of installing fixed solar photovoltaic modules and modules with different tracking options

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2023.286464

Keywords:

photovoltaic module, angle of incidence of solar rays, angle of inclination, angle of inclination to the horizon, efficiency of module installation

Abstract

The object of this study is photovoltaic modules in various installation options. The physical model of the Earth's illumination by a parallel flow of solar rays has been refined. The dependence of the cosine of the angle of incidence of the Sun's rays on the angular length of the day, as well as the average annual efficiency of the installation of photovoltaic modules, both fixed and with various tracking options, was determined. Refinement of the physical model implies determining the angle of inclination as the angle between the inclined axis of the Earth and its projection on a vertical plane, perpendicular to the line connecting the centers of the Earth and the Sun. This line passes through the center of the Earth. The concept of the average annual efficiency of the installation of photovoltaic modules is introduced as the annual weighted average value of the cosine of the angle of incidence of solar rays on the plane of the photovoltaic module. Various options for installing photovoltaic modules were analyzed: fixed horizontal on the equator; stationary, installed at an angle to the horizon; one that performs tracking in horizontal (vertical) planes; with full tracking. The efficiency of installing a photovoltaic module at each latitude can be equal to the efficiency of installing this module at the equator, that is, 47.93 % when installing the module at an angle of inclination to the horizon equal to the latitude. Tracking in the vertical plane makes it possible to increase the efficiency of the photovoltaic module installation by up to 50 %. Compared to full tracking, tracking in the horizontal plane at an angle of latitude makes it possible to obtain the efficiency of the installation of the photovoltaic module at the level of 97.93 %.

The results could be used as a basis for evaluating the efficiency of the installation of photovoltaic modules at different latitudes with different techniques of their installation, as well as for the subsequent generation of electricity

Author Biographies

Gennadii Golub, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor

Department of Tractors, Cars and Bioenergy Resources

Nataliya Tsyvenkova, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Tractors, Cars and Bioenergy Resources

Oksana Yaremenko, Institute of Renewable Energy of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine

Department of Renewable Organic Energy Resources

Oleh Marus, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Tractors, Cars and Bioenergy Resources

Ivan Omarov, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine

Postgraduate Student

Department of Renewable Organic Energy Resources

Anna Нolubenko, Polissia National University

Assistant

Department of Electrification, Automation of Production and Engineering Ecology

References

  1. Dib, M., Nejmi, A., Ramzi, M. (2020). New auxiliary services system in a transmission substation in the presence of a renewable energy source PV. Materials Today: Proceedings, 27, 3151–3156. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.820
  2. Satpathy, R., Pamuru, V. (2020). Solar PV Power: Design, Manufacturing and Applications from Sand to Systems. Academic Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/c2018-0-02530-x
  3. Umar, S., Waqas, A., Tanveer, W., Shahzad, N., Janjua, A. K., Dehghan, M. et al. (2023). A building integrated solar PV surface-cleaning setup to optimize the electricity output of PV modules in a polluted atmosphere. Renewable Energy, 216, 119122. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.119122
  4. Lu, Y., Li, G. (2023). Potential application of electrical performance enhancement methods in PV/T module. Energy, 281, 128253. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.128253
  5. Jha, V. (2023). Generalized modelling of PV module and different PV array configurations under partial shading condition. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 56, 103021. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2023.103021
  6. Barbosa de Melo, K., Kitayama da Silva, M., Lucas de Souza Silva, J., Costa, T. S., Villalva, M. G. (2022). Study of energy improvement with the insertion of bifacial modules and solar trackers in photovoltaic installations in Brazil. Renewable Energy Focus, 41, 179–187. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ref.2022.02.005
  7. Dhimish, M., Ahmad, A., Tyrrell, A. M. (2022). Inequalities in photovoltaics modules reliability: From packaging to PV installation site. Renewable Energy, 192, 805–814. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.04.156
  8. Peters, I. M., Hauch, J. A., Brabec, C. J. (2022). The role of innovation for economy and sustainability of photovoltaic modules. IScience, 25 (10), 105208. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.105208
  9. Duffie, J. A., Beckman, W. A. (2013). Solar Engineering of Thermal Processes. John Wiley & Sons. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118671603
  10. Wald, L. (2021). Fundamentals of Solar Radiation. CRC Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003155454
  11. Grygiel, P., Tarłowski, J., Prześniak-Welenc, M., Łapiński, M., Łubiński, J., Mielewczyk-Gryń, A. et al. (2021). Prototype design and development of low-load-roof photovoltaic modules for applications in on-grid systems. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 233, 111384. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2021.111384
  12. Winter, C.-J., Sizmann, R. L., Vant-Hull, L. L. (Eds.) (1991). Solar Power Plants. Springer Berlin, 425. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-61245-9
  13. Cooper, P. I. (1969). The absorption of radiation in solar stills. Solar Energy, 12 (3), 333–346. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-092x(69)90047-4
  14. Barbón, A., Ghodbane, M., Bayón, L., Said, Z. (2022). A general algorithm for the optimization of photovoltaic modules layout on irregular rooftop shapes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 365, 132774. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132774
  15. Konovalov, Y. V., Khaziev, A. N. (2022). Computer technology applications to calculate the insolation of photoelectric power plant. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 990 (1), 012048. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/990/1/012048
  16. Yassir, A. (2019). Genetic Algorithm as a Solutions Optimization of Tilt Angles for Monthly Periods of Photovoltaic Installation. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 536 (1), 012100. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/536/1/012100
  17. Khadidja, B., Dris, K., Boubeker, A., Noureddine, S. (2014). Optimisation of a Solar Tracker System for Photovoltaic Power Plants in Saharian Region, Example of Ouargla. Energy Procedia, 50, 610–618. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.06.075
  18. Jin, Z., Xu, K., Zhang, Y., Xiao, X., Zhou, J., Long, E. (2017). Installation Optimization on the Tilt and Azimuth Angles of the Solar Heating Collectors for High Altitude Towns in Western Sichuan. Procedia Engineering, 205, 2995–3002. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.10.225
  19. Pan, D., Bai, Y., Chang, M., Wang, X., Wang, W. (2022). The technical and economic potential of urban rooftop photovoltaic systems for power generation in Guangzhou, China. Energy and Buildings, 277, 112591. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112591
  20. N’Tsoukpoe, K. E. (2022). Effect of orientation and tilt angles of solar collectors on their performance: Analysis of the relevance of general recommendations in the West and Central African context. Scientific African, 15, e01069. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2021.e01069
  21. Shu, N., Kameda, N., Kishida, Y., Sonoda, H. (2006). Experimental and Theoretical Study on the Optimal Tilt Angle of Photovoltaic Panels. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 5 (2), 399–405. doi: https://doi.org/10.3130/jaabe.5.399
  22. Buzra, U., Mitrushi, D., Serdari, E., Halili, D., Muda, V. (2022). Fixed and adjusted optimal tilt angle of solar panels in three cities in Albania. Journal of Energy Systems, 6 (2), 153–164. doi: https://doi.org/10.30521/jes.952260
  23. Nikitenko, G. V., Konoplev, E. V., Salpagarov, V. K., Danchenko, I. V., Masyutina, G. V. (2020). Improving the energy efficiency of using solar panels. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 613 (1), 012092. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/613/1/012092
  24. Kuttybay, N., Saymbetov, A., Mekhilef, S., Nurgaliyev, M., Tukymbekov, D., Dosymbetova, G. et al. (2020). Optimized Single-Axis Schedule Solar Tracker in Different Weather Conditions. Energies, 13 (19), 5226. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/en13195226
  25. Jäger, K., Isabella, O., Smets, A. H. M., Swaaij, R. A., Zeman, M. (2014). Solar Energy, Fundamentals, Technology, and Systems. Delft: Delft University of Technology, 408. Available at: http://web.kpi.kharkov.ua/ief/wp-content/uploads/sites/39/2020/05/solar_energy_1.pdf
  26. Renewable Energy. Solar Power (2009). Courseware Sample by the staff of Lab-Volt Ltd., 115.
Determining the efficiency of installing fixed solar photovoltaic modules and modules with different tracking options

Downloads

Published

2023-08-31

How to Cite

Golub, G., Tsyvenkova, N., Yaremenko, O., Marus, O., Omarov, I., & Нolubenko A. (2023). Determining the efficiency of installing fixed solar photovoltaic modules and modules with different tracking options. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 4(8 (124), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2023.286464

Issue

Section

Energy-saving technologies and equipment