Assessment of iron and heavy metals accumulation in the soils of the combat zone

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2023.289289

Keywords:

war, immobilization of metals, soil contamination, heavy metals, impact of military operations

Abstract

The object of the study is soils in areas with active military operations.

The study is dedicated to assessing the environmental impact of military operations through forecasting.

The paper highlights the impact of military conflict on the distribution of heavy metals in soils. An analysis of the distribution and interaction of heavy metals in soil is carried out, which helps to understand the dynamics of pollution in the context of military conflict, and allows to understand the complex processes of the impact of military operations on the environment and the state of soil resources.

The complex interrelationships between military operations and environmental pollution are revealed, with an emphasis on the importance of studying the distribution and immobilization of iron and heavy metals in the current conditions of the risk of military operations.

It is shown that the most rapidly distributed metals in the soil are: iron (Fe), zinc (Zn), cadmium (Cd), antimony (Sb); the slowest: arsenic (As), lead (Pb), copper (Cu), nickel (Ni), mercury (Hg), manganese (Mn), vanadium (V).

It was found that loams and chernozems are more prone to the accumulation of heavy metals and iron than sandy soils. Compared to sandy soil, the rate of metal release in loam decreases from 16.7 % to 69.7 %. In comparison of chernozem to loam, the release rate slows down from 17.85 % to 32.08 %. It was found that the rate of spreading of barium, cobalt, arsenic, lead, mercury, manganese, strontium and titanium does not depend on the type and mechanical parameters of the soil.

The practical use of the results will help to predict the mechanism of pollution spread and help to identify the highest risk areas. The results of the study indicate the need to develop scientifically sound strategies for environmental protection and promotion of sustainable development in the area affected by military events

Author Biographies

Ganna Trokhymenko, Admiral Makarov National University of Shipbuilding

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Head of Department

Department of Ecology and Environmental Technologies

Serhiy Litvak, Admiral Makarov National University of Shipbuilding

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Ecology and Environmental Technologies

Olga Litvak, Admiral Makarov National University of Shipbuilding

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Ecology and Environmental Technologies

Antonina Andreeva, Admiral Makarov National University of Shipbuilding

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Ecology and Environmental Technologies

Olena Rabich, Prydniprovska State Academy of Civil Engineering and Architecture

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Life Safety

Larisa Chumak, Prydniprovska State Academy of Civil Engineering and Architecture

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Fundamental and Natural Sciences

Mykola Nalysko, Prydniprovska State Academy of Civil Engineering and Architecture

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor

Department of Life Safety

Mykhailo Troshyn, Prydniprovska State Academy of Civil Engineering and Architecture

Senior Lecturer

Department of Architecture

Bohdana Komarysta, National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Artificial Intelligence

Educational and Research Institute for Applied System Analysis

Dmytro Sopov, Luhansk Taras Shevchenko National University

Doctor of Philosophy in Geoscience, Associate Professor

Department of Chemistry, Geography and Earth Sciences

References

  1. Rawtani, D., Gupta, G., Khatri, N., Rao, P. K., Hussain, C. M. (2022). Environmental damages due to war in Ukraine: A perspective. Science of The Total Environment, 850, 157932. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157932
  2. Liu, Y., Wang, H., Zhang, H., Liber, K. (2016). A comprehensive support vector machine-based classification model for soil quality assessment. Soil and Tillage Research, 155, 19–26. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2015.07.006
  3. Liu, P., Wang, P., Lu, Y., Ding, Y., Lu, G., Dang, Z., Shi, Z. (2019). Modeling kinetics of heavy metal release from field-contaminated soils: Roles of soil adsorbents and binding sites. Chemical Geology, 506, 187–196. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2018.12.030
  4. Fayiga, A. O. (2019). Remediation of inorganic and organic contaminants in military ranges. Environmental Chemistry, 16 (2), 81. doi: https://doi.org/10.1071/en18196
  5. Komárek, M., Vaněk, A., Ettler, V. (2013). Chemical stabilization of metals and arsenic in contaminated soils using oxides – A review. Environmental Pollution, 172, 9–22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2012.07.045
  6. Tauqeer, H. M., Fatima, M., Rashid, A., Shahbaz, A. K., Ramzani, P. M. A., Farhad, M. et al. (2021). The Current Scenario and Prospects of Immobilization Remediation Technique for the Management of Heavy Metals Contaminated Soils. Approaches to the Remediation of Inorganic Pollutants, 155–185. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6221-1_8
  7. Radziemska, M., Bęś, A., Gusiatin, Z. M., Cerdà, A., Mazur, Z., Jeznach, J. et al. (2019). The combined effect of phytostabilization and different amendments on remediation of soils from post-military areas. Science of The Total Environment, 688, 37–45. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.190
  8. Kokorīte, I., Kļaviņš, M., Šīre, J., Purmalis, O., Zučika, A. (2008). Soil Pollution with Trace Elements in Territories of Military Grounds in Latvia. Proceedings of the Latvian Academy of Sciences. Section B. Natural, Exact, and Applied Sciences, 62 (1-2), 27–33. doi: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10046-008-0010-5
  9. Ilgen, A. G., Majs, F., Barker, A. J., Douglas, T. A., Trainor, T. P. (2014). Oxidation and mobilization of metallic antimony in aqueous systems with simulated groundwater. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 132, 16–30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2014.01.019
  10. Peng, X., Dai, Q., Ding, G., Shi, D., Li, C. (2019). The role of soil water retention functions of near-surface fissures with different vegetation types in a rocky desertification area. Plant and Soil, 441 (1-2), 587–599. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-019-04147-1
  11. Bordeleau, G., Martel, R., Ampleman, G., Thiboutot, S. (2008). Environmental Impacts of Training Activities at an Air Weapons Range. Journal of Environmental Quality, 37 (2), 308–317. doi: https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2007.0197
  12. Lafond, S., Blais, J.-F., Mercier, G., Martel, R. (2013). Counter-current acid leaching process for the removal of Cu, Pb, Sb and Zn from shooting range soil. Environmental Technology, 34 (16), 2377–2387. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2013.770560
  13. Laporte‐Saumure, M., Martel, R., Mercier, G. (2011). Characterization and metal availability of copper, lead, antimony and zinc contamination at four Canadian small arms firing ranges. Environmental Technology, 32 (7), 767–781. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2010.512298
  14. Fayiga, A. O., Saha, U., Ma, L. Q. (2011). Chemical and physical characterization of lead in three shooting range soils in Florida. Chemical Speciation & Bioavailability, 23 (3), 163–169. doi: https://doi.org/10.3184/095422911x13103191328195
  15. Sanderson, P., Naidu, R., Bolan, N., Bowman, M., Mclure, S. (2012). Effect of soil type on distribution and bioaccessibility of metal contaminants in shooting range soils. Science of The Total Environment, 438, 452–462. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.08.014
  16. Mesić Kiš, I., Karaica, B., Medunić, G., Romić, M., Šabarić, J., Balen, D., Šoštarko, K. (2016). Soil, bark and leaf trace metal loads related to the war legacy (The Prašnik rainforest, Croatia). Rudarsko-Geološko-Naftni Zbornik, 31 (2), 13–28. doi: https://doi.org/10.17794/rgn.2016.2.2
  17. Kalander, E., Abdullah, M. M., Al-Bakri, J. (2021). The Impact of Different Types of Hydrocarbon Disturbance on the Resiliency of Native Desert Vegetation in a War-Affected Area: A Case Study from the State of Kuwait. Plants, 10 (9), 1945. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10091945
  18. Nurzhanova, A., Pidlisnyuk, V., Abit, K., Nurzhanov, C., Kenessov, B., Stefanovska, T., Erickson, L. (2019). Comparative assessment of using Miscanthus × giganteus for remediation of soils contaminated by heavy metals: a case of military and mining sites. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26 (13), 13320–13333. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04707-z
Assessment of iron and heavy metals accumulation in the soils of the combat zone

Downloads

Published

2023-10-31

How to Cite

Trokhymenko, G., Litvak, S., Litvak, O., Andreeva, A., Rabich, O., Chumak, L., Nalysko, M., Troshyn, M., Komarysta, B., & Sopov, D. (2023). Assessment of iron and heavy metals accumulation in the soils of the combat zone. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5(10 (125), 6–16. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2023.289289