Heat flow density measurement during non-destructive testing

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2024.304597

Keywords:

heat flow meter, thermoelectric battery converter, copper-constantan thermocouple, non-destructive method

Abstract

The object of the study is the development of a device capable of accurately and reliably measuring heat flux density in various environments. The development of a heat flux density meter designed for non-destructive analysis of thermal processes in various fields of application is presented.

The developed device is intended for evaluating the thermal insulation condition of underground pipelines. The functionality of the heat flow device relies on comparing standard temperature values with experimental ones measured on the soil surface. To ensure accurate and reliable measurement of heat flux density, the basis is a thermoelectric battery converter, which uses the auxiliary wall method. The heat flow density measuring device is constructed in the shape of a restricted cylinder, with one base serving as the working surface, while the second base establishes thermal contact with the body at ambient temperature. Embedded heaters enable the generation of heat flow through the thermoelectric sensor in directions perpendicular to its base. For calibrating the heat flux device, experiments were conducted using a standard copper-constantan calibration table. Temperature increments were determined from thermo electromotive force, and tests were performed on an existing heating network. The conducted measurements validate the fundamental feasibility of employing the proposed device for implementing the non-destructive thermal testing method on underground heating mains.

The results of the experiment can be used not only for research, but also for monitoring and regulating processes in various fields of science and technology. The developed heat flux meter promises a significant contribution to the development of modern methods for analyzing thermal processes.

The dimensions of the thermoelectric battery converter are also determined and the coefficient (kq) should be in the range from 4.0 to 12.0 W/(m2⋅mV), and the electrical resistance should be in the range of 12–20 kOhm

Author Biographies

Dana Karabekova, Karaganda Buketov University

Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)

Department of Engineering Thermophysics named after professor Zh.S. Akylbayev

Perizat Kissabekova, Karaganda Buketov University

Master of Pedagogical Sciences

Department of Physics and Nanotechnology

Ayanbergen Khassenov, Karaganda Buketov University

Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)

Department of Engineering Thermophysics named after professor Zh.S. Akylbayev

Volodymyr Kucheruk, Uman National University of Horticulture

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor

Department of Informational Technologies

Arystan Kudussov, Karaganda Buketov University

Candidate of Physical and Mathematical Sciences

Department of Physics and Nanotechnology

References

  1. Peter, L. (2020). Development of a non-destructive testing method for thermal assessment of a district heating network. Chalmers University of Technology, 34. Available at: https://research.chalmers.se/publication/515569/file/515569_Fulltext.pdf
  2. Standard Test Method for Steady-State Heat Flux Measurements and Thermal Transmission Properties by Means of the Guarded-Hot-Plate Apparatus: ASTM C177-10.
  3. McAfee, K., Sunderland, P. B., Rabin, O. (2023). A heat flux sensor leveraging the transverse Seebeck effect in elemental antimony. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 363, 114729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2023.114729
  4. Pullins, C. A., Diller, T. E. (2010). In situ High Temperature Heat Flux Sensor Calibration. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 53 (17-18), 3429–3438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2010.03.042
  5. Saidi, A., Kim, J. (2004). Heat flux sensor with minimal impact on boundary conditions. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 28 (8), 903–908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2004.01.004
  6. Akoshima, M. (2021). Developement of an apparatus for practical calibration of heat flux sensors. Measurement: Sensors, 18, 100343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measen.2021.100343
  7. Pountney, O. J., Patinios, M., Tang, H., Luberti, D., Sangan, C. M., Scobie, J. A. et al. (2021). Calibration of thermopile heat flux gauges using a physically-based equation. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy, 235 (7), 1806–1816. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957650920982103
  8. Fralick, G., Wrbanek, J., Blaha, C. (2002). Thin Film Heat Flux Improved Design. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 211566. Available at: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20020082950/downloads/20020082950.pdf
  9. Azerou, B., Garnier, B., Lahmar, J. (2012). Thin film heat flux sensors for accurate transient and unidirectional heat transfer analysis. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 395, 012084. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/395/1/012084
  10. Kava, M. P., Patel, A. (2023). Design Development and Performance of a Heat Flux Meter Subjected to a Steady State Heat Flux Conditions. Vol. IV Mechanical Engineering, Metallurgical & Materials Engineering, Textile Engineering. Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/370074617_Design_Development_and_Performance_of_a_Heat_Flux_Meter_Subjected_to_a_Steady_State_Heat_Flux_Conditions
  11. Diller, T. E. (2015). Heat Flux Measurement. Mechanical Engineers’ Handbook, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118985960.meh407
  12. Ewing, J., Gifford, A., Hubble, D., Vlachos, P., Wicks, A., Diller, T. (2010). A direct-measurement thin-film heat flux sensor array. Measurement Science and Technology, 21 (10), 105201. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/21/10/105201
  13. Karabekova, D. Zh., Kissabekova, P. A., Khassenov, A. K., Azatbek, Sh. (2021). Pat. No. 6393 RK. A device for measuring heat flow. No. 021/0315.2; declareted: 01.04.2021; published: 03.09.2021.
  14. Karabekova, D. Zh., Kissabekova, P. A., Kucheruk, V. Yu., Mussenova, E. K., Azatbek, Sh. (2022). Main characteristics of the heat flow meter. Eurasian Physical Technical Journal, 19 (2 (40)), 71–74. https://doi.org/10.31489/2022no2/71-74
  15. Karabekova, D. Zh., Kissabekova, P. A., Nussupbekov, B. R., Khassenov, A. K. (2021). Analysis of the Insulation State of Underground Pipelines in the Heating Network. Thermal Engineering, 68 (10), 802–805. https://doi.org/10.1134/s0040601521100013
  16. Kissabekova, P. A., Karabekova, D. Zh., Khassenov, A. K., Kucheruk, V. Yu., Kudusov, A. S., Kyzdarbekova, Sh. S. (2023). Theoretical foundations of the construction of the operation of heat flow devices. Bulletin of the Karaganda University “Physics Series,” 1 (109), 80–87. https://doi.org/10.31489/2023ph1/80-87
  17. Nussupbekov, B. R., Karabekova, D. Zh., Khassenov, A. K., Nussupbekov, U. B. (2016). Pat. No. 1588 RK. Heat flow meter. published: 29.07.2016.
Heat flow density measurement during non-destructive testing

Downloads

Published

2024-06-28

How to Cite

Karabekova, D., Kissabekova, P., Khassenov, A., Kucheruk, V., & Kudussov, A. (2024). Heat flow density measurement during non-destructive testing. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 3(5 (129), 45–51. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2024.304597

Issue

Section

Applied physics