Devising an approach to the construction of an adapted model of the reconnaissance-fire system functioning

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2024.309561

Keywords:

reconnaissance-fire system, modeling, Kolmogorov-Chapman equation, combat operations, military control

Abstract

The object of this study is the operational model of a reconnaissance-fire system.

The problem that was solved is the lack of an approach to building a model of the functioning of a combat system, in particular a reconnaissance-fire system, which would take into account the influence of all subsystems and include the necessary number of system states.

An improved procedure for building an adapted operational model of the reconnaissance-fire system has been proposed. The essence of the improved methodology is the formalization of processes through the definition of system states and intensities of transitions from state to state. The improved procedure is based on the Kolmogorov-Chapman equations and the goal tree construction method.

A feature of the improved methodology is the breakdown of the states of the reconnaissance-fire system by hierarchy levels, which allows taking into account more necessary states of the system.

The field of practical use of the improved methodology is planning and management processes during the development of action algorithms during combat operations.

An adapted operational model of the reconnaissance-fire system has been built. The essence of the model is to determine the probability of the reconnaissance-fire system being in a certain state based on the Chapman-Kolmogorov equations, taking into account the necessary level of detail in the process of its operation.

Special feature of the proposed model is that it makes it possible to model by taking into account 39 states of the system with the necessary accuracy both for the system as a whole and separately for subsystems. This is explained by the fact that the test of the adequacy of the model showed that the discrepancy of the results is within the statistical error from 2 to 9 %.

The field of application of the adapted operational model of the reconnaissance-fire system is the processes of making a decision on the application of the operation of the intelligence-fire system during hostilities and their management during combat operations.

Author Biographies

Oleksandr Maistrenko, National Defence University of Ukraine

Doctor of Military Sciences, Professor

Department of Special Operations Forces

Andrii Saveliev, National Defence University of Ukraine

PhD, Associate Professor, Deputy Head of the Institute

Oleksandr Pechorin, National Defence University of Ukraine

PhD, Associate Professor, Head of Department

Department of Special Operations Forces

Oleksandr Karavanov, Hetman Petro Sahaidachnyi National Army Academy

PhD, Professor

Department of Artillery Reconnaissance Systems and Devices

Stanislav Stetsiv, Hetman Petro Sahaidachnyi National Army Academy

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Missile Forces

Mykola Shvets, The Scientific and Methodological Center of Scientific, Scientific and Technical Activities Organization

PhD, Senior Researcher

Oleksandr Lykholot, Command and Staff Institute of Troops (Forces) Employment

PhD

Department of Missile Troops and Artillery

Serhii Voitenko, Ivan Kozhedub Kharkiv National Air Force University

PhD, Associate Professor

Research Laboratory

Oleksandr Khimchenko, Military and Strategic Research Centre

PhD

Yulii Kondratenko, Centre for Military and Strategic Studies

PhD

References

  1. Weissmann, M., Nilsson, N. (Eds.) (2023). Advanced Land Warfare: Tactics and Operations. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192857422.001.0001
  2. Henåker, L. (2022). Decision-making style and victory in battle – Is there a relation? Comparative Strategy, 41 (4), 415–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/01495933.2022.2087436
  3. Ti, R., Kinsey, C. (2023). Lessons from the Russo-Ukrainian conflict: the primacy of logistics over strategy. Defence Studies, 23 (3), 381–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2023.2238613
  4. Fedorchak, V. (2024). The Russia-Ukraine War: Towards Resilient Fighting Power. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003351641
  5. Zadunaiskyi, V. (2023). Stratagems of the Ukrainian and Russian troops in the battles for Kharkiv (February 24 - May 14, 2022). Skhid, 5 (1), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.21847/2411-3093.2023.5(1).281033
  6. Understanding the 7 Mission Command Principles (2022). CONTROLLED F.O.R.C.E. Available at: https://controlledforce.com/understanding-the-7-mission-command-principles/#:~:text=Mission%20command%20is%20a%20philosophy,maintaining%20control%20over%20their%20unit
  7. Shcherba, A. A. (2014). The evolution of reconnaissance-fire technology on the basis of network-centric principles of management. Herald of Khmelnytskyi National University, 4 (215), 109–112. Available at: http://journals.khnu.km.ua/vestnik/pdf/tech/2014_4/18.pdf
  8. Karavanov, O., Kuprinenko, O., Maistrenko, O., Balandin, M., Volkov, I. (2022). Analysis of scientific and methodological approaches to simulation of the functioning process of reconnaissance and fire systems. Systems of Arms and Military Equipment, 3 (71), 68–74. https://doi.org/10.30748/soivt.2022.71.09
  9. Stodola, P., Drozd, J., Šilinger, K., Hodický, J., Procházka, D. (2020). Collective Perception Using UAVs: Autonomous Aerial Reconnaissance in a Complex Urban Environment. Sensors, 20 (10), 2926. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20102926
  10. Stodola, P., Nohel, J. (2022). Reconnaissance in Complex Environment with No-Fly Zones Using a Swarm of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 308–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98260-7_19
  11. Lu, F., Hu, X., Zhao, B., Jiang, X., Liu, D., Lai, J., Wang, Z. (2023). Review of the Research Progress in Combat Simulation Software. Applied Sciences, 13 (9), 5571. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13095571
  12. Washburn, A., Kress, M. (2009). Combat Modeling. In International Series in Operations Research & Management Science. Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0790-5
  13. Kostić, M., Jovanović, A., Kovač, M. (2023). Modeling of combat operations. Vojnotehnicki Glasnik, 71 (3), 529–558. https://doi.org/10.5937/vojtehg71-43509
  14. Seo, K.-M., Choi, C., Kim, T. G., Kim, J. H. (2014). DEVS-based combat modeling for engagement-level simulation. SIMULATION, 90 (7), 759–781. https://doi.org/10.1177/0037549714532960
  15. Biggs, A., Huffman, G., Hamilton, J., Javes, K., Brookfield, J., Viggiani, A. et al. (2023). Small arms combat modeling: a superior way to evaluate marksmanship data. Journal of Defense Analytics and Logistics, 7 (1), 69–87. https://doi.org/10.1108/jdal-11-2022-0012
  16. Deller, S., Bowling, S. R., Rabadi, G. A., Tolk, A., Bell, M. I. (2009). Applying the information age combat model: Quantitative analysis of network centric operations. The International C2 Journal, 3 (1), 1–25. Available at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/msve_fac_pubs/28
  17. Lauren, M. K., McIntosh, G. C., Perry, N., Moffat, J. (2007). Art of war hidden in Kolmogorov’s equations. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 17 (1). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2712771
  18. Atrokhov, A. V., Verner, I. E., Havanko, V. I., Kaipetskyi, O. A., Kozakov, Yu. I., Kozlov, V. V. et al. (2005). Osnovy modeliuvannia boiovykh diy viysk. Kyiv: NAOU, 484.
  19. Maistrenko, O., Khoma, V., Karavanov, O., Stetsiv, S., Shcherba, A. (2021). Devising a procedure for justifying the choice of reconnaissance-firing systems. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1 (3 (109)), 60–71. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.224324
  20. Logvinenko, S. (2024). Conducting artillery reconnaissance from observation posts. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Natsionalnoi akademiyi Derzhavnoi prykordonnoi sluzhby Ukrainy. Seriya: viyskovi ta tekhnichni nauky, 92 (3), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.32453/3.v92i3.1461
  21. Yarosh, S., Huriev, D. (2021). Justification of the possibility of using modern, improved and advanced weapons to combat unmanned aerial vehicles in a group of anti-aircraft missile forces. Science and Technology of the Air Force of Ukraine, 3 (44), 88–100. https://doi.org/10.30748/nitps.2021.44.10
  22. Horielyshev, S., Ivanchenko, A., Bashkatov, Y. (2023). The "KROPYVA" software complex as an element of the prospective automated control system of the National Guard of Ukraine. The scientific journal of the National Academy of National Guard "Honor and Law", 4 (87), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.33405/2078-7480/2023/4/87/295097
  23. Świętochowski, N. (2024). Field Artillery in the defensive war of Ukraine 2022-2023. Part II. Methods of task implementation. Scientific Journal of the Military University of Land Forces, 211 (1), 57–76. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0054.4136
  24. Matrix calculator. Available at: https://matrixcalc.org/
  25. Repilo, Y., Golovchenko, O. (2021). The model of combating by artillery units during fire support during offensive actions. Modern Information Technologies in the Sphere of Security and Defence, 40 (1), 153–162. https://doi.org/10.33099/2311-7249/2021-40-1-153-162
  26. Bakalov, V., Kuzmenko, V., Nikitchenko, V., Yarysh, I. (2022). Mathematical modeling of the survival of the artillery division during combat. Scientific works of State Scientific Research Institute of Armament and Military Equipment Testing and Certification, 12 (2), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.37701/dndivsovt.12.2022.01
  27. Adamenko, M., Zabolotny, О. (2018). Mathematical model of the operation of radar reconnaissance bodies in conditions of combat operations. Збірник наукових праць Tsentru voienno-stratehichnykh doslidzhen NUOU imeni Ivana Cherniakhovskoho, 1 (62), 107–112. https://doi.org/10.33099/2304-2745/2018-1-62/107-112
  28. Baranov, S. (2023). Recommendations on the formation of requirements for reconnaissance of enemy objects in operations (combat actions) of troop groups (forces) of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Social Development and Security, 13 (4), 299–313. https://doi.org/10.33445/sds.2023.13.4.21
  29. Husak, U., Kirsanov, S., Ostrovskiy, S. (2021). Mathematical model of automated command and control in automated command and control system SIMILAR to C4ISR. Modern Information Technologies in the Sphere of Security and Defence, 40 (1), 47–54. https://doi.org/10.33099/2311-7249/2021-40-1-47-54
  30. Maistrenko, O., Ryzhov, Y., Khaustov, D., Tsbulia, S., Nastishin, Y. (2021). Decision-Making Model for Task Execution by a Military Unit in Terms of Queuing Theory. Military Operations Research, 26 (1), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.5711/1082598326159
  31. Kim, T., Suh, S., Jung, G. (2015). Analysis Procedure for Fire Power Suppression on Enemy Artillery Base Using FASCAM. Journal of the Korea Institute of Military Science and Technology, 18 (6), 743–754. https://doi.org/10.9766/kimst.2015.18.6.743
  32. Kuiper, E., Nadjm-Tehrani, S. (2006). Mobility Models for UAV Group Reconnaissance Applications. 2006 International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Communications (ICWMC’06). https://doi.org/10.1109/icwmc.2006.63
  33. Cha, Y.-H., Kim, Y.-D. (2010). Fire scheduling for planned artillery attack operations under time-dependent destruction probabilities. Omega, 38 (5), 383–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2009.10.003
  34. Guzik, D. M. (1988). A Markov model for measuring artillery fire support effectiveness. Calhoun. Available at: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/36716303.pdf
  35. Wang, Z., Liu, L., Long, T., Wen, Y. (2018). Multi-UAV reconnaissance task allocation for heterogeneous targets using an opposition-based genetic algorithm with double-chromosome encoding. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 31 (2), 339–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2017.09.005
  36. Ivanov, D., Oliinyk, R., Zhivetc, Y., Ivanova, V. (2024). Reconnaissance and strike systems in network-centric warfare. Scientific works of State Scientific Research Institute of Armament and Military Equipment Testing and Certification , 19 (1), 56–61. https://doi.org/10.37701/dndivsovt.19.2024.07
  37. Kondratenko, Ye., Stetsiuk, R., Holovchenko, O. (2023). Analityko-stokhastychna model vedennia boiovykh diy rozviduvalno-vohnevym kompleksom pid chas vohnevoi pidtrymky z vykorystanniam teorii markovskykh vypadkovykh protsesiv iz bezperervnym chasom. Grail of Science, 29) 97–103. https://doi.org/10.36074/grail-of-science.07.07.2023.015
  38. Repilo, I., Prymirenko, V., Demianiuk, A. (2023). The methodology for prioritizing enemy targets for acceptance as possible targets for fire support using the CARVER matrix. Modern Information Technologies in the Sphere of Security and Defence, 47 (2), 155–166. https://doi.org/10.33099/2311-7249/2023-47-2-155-166
  39. Repilo, Y., Ishchenko, O. (2023). The method of assessing the adequacy of the capabilities of unmanned aviation complexes regarding aerial reconnaissance in the interests of performing artillery fire tasks іn armed conflicts. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Natsionalnoi akademiyi Derzhavnoi prykordonnoi sluzhby Ukrainy. Seriya: viyskovi ta tekhnichni nauky, 88 (3), 125–149. https://doi.org/10.32453/3.v88i3.1252
  40. Kovalenko, O. (2024). U travni vtraty armiyi rf dosiahly rekordnykh pokaznykiv. Informatsiynyi sprotyv. Available at: https://sprotyv.info/analitica/u-travni-vtrati-armiї-rf-dosyagli-rekordnih-pokaznikiv/
  41. Evans, A., Mappes, G., Wolkov, N., Stepanenko, K., Barros, G. (2024). Russian Offensive Campaign Assessment, June 18, 2024. The Institute for the Study of War. Available at: https://www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder/russian-offensive-campaign-assessment-june-18-2024
  42. Suprun, V. M., Zaskoka, A. M., Troshchenko, D. S. (2015). Analitychni modeli skladnykh system. Sumy: SumDU, 42. Available at: http://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/52151
  43. Leeb, H., Pötscher, B. M., Ewald, K. (2015). On Various Confidence Intervals Post-Model-Selection. Statistical Science, 30 (2). https://doi.org/10.1214/14-sts507
  44. Maistrenko, O., Khoma, V., Shcherba, A., Olshevskyi, Y., Pereverzin, Y., Popkov, O. et al. (2022). Improving a procedure for determining the factors that influence the need of higher education institutions for specialists of the highest qualification. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1 (3 (115)), 86–96. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2022.251027
  45. Maistrenko, O., Khoma, V., Kurban, V., Savelіev, A., Shcherba, A., Karavanov, O. et al. (2023). Improving the scientific and methodological apparatus for determining the optimum strategy when selecting a grouping element for performing the task. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5 (3 (125)), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2023.289100
Devising an approach to the construction of an adapted model of the reconnaissance-fire system functioning

Downloads

Published

2024-08-30

How to Cite

Maistrenko, O., Saveliev, A., Pechorin, O., Karavanov, O., Stetsiv, S., Shvets, M., Lykholot, O., Voitenko, S., Khimchenko, O., & Kondratenko, Y. (2024). Devising an approach to the construction of an adapted model of the reconnaissance-fire system functioning . Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 4(3 (130), 6–20. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2024.309561

Issue

Section

Control processes