Analysis of values of terminal groups of students Kharkov universities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15391/snsv.2014-3.023Keywords:
terminal values, physical education, comparative analysis, significant differencesAbstract
Purpose: to determine the values of the features of the Kharkiv university students. Material and Methods: the study was conducted in September and October 2013 in S. Kuznets Kharkiv National Economic University (KNEU), Kharkiv National University of Construction and Architecture (KNUBA) and H. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University (KNPU). In study involved 523 students. For the analysis of value orientations of individual students was used morphological test of values V. Sopova and L. V. Karpushina. Results: analysis of scientific literature on the problem of the study; conducted comparative analysis of terminal values in life students of the first and second courses, boys and girls, students and teachers and students from different faculties, the analysis of terminal values in life of them students of KNEU, who said the high value of the sphere of physical activity, and Kharkiv university students of different learning profiles; Comparative analysis of the orientation of the individual groups of students KNUE HNUBA and KNPU certain values in life. Conclusions: different students have different kontenhenty relation to certain values in life. Some of the differences observed by age in both boys and girls, and between teachers and students of S. Kuznets KNEU. But between boys and girls significant differences with respect to certain life values were found; in focus groups of students to universities in Kharkiv certain values in life, almost no differences between students from different education profile; Most students who are active in the field of physical education, seeking to realize spiritual and moral values than selfish – prestigious (pragmatic).References
Abulkhanova-Slavskaya K. A. Strategiya zhizni [Life strategy], Moscow, 1991, 299 p. (rus)
Astashova N. A. Uchitel. Problema vybora i formirovaniya tsennostey [Teacher. The problem of choice and value formation], Moscow, 2001, 272 p. (rus)
Budinayte G. L., Kornilova T. V. Voprosy psikhologii [Questions of psychology], 1993, vol. 3, pp. 99. (rus)
Ilin Ye. P. Motivatsiya i motivy [Motivation and motives], Saint Petersburg, 2000, 512 p. (rus)
Kutek T. B. Slobozans’kij nauk.-sport. visn. [Slobozhanskyi science and sport bulletin], Kharkіv, 2013, vol. 3, pp. 207–210. (ukr)
Lapin N. I. Sotsis [Sotsis], 1999, vol. 5, p. 114–118. (rus)
Marchenko O. Yu. Slobozans’kij nauk.-sport. visn. [Slobozhanskyi science and sport bulletin], Kharkіv, 2011, vol. 1, pp. 127–131. (ukr)
Yarmachenko M. D. Pedagogіchniy slovnik [Pedagogіchny vocabulary], Kyiv, 2001, pp. 408–412. (ukr)
Petrovskiy A. V., Yaroshevskiy M. G. Psikhologiya [Psychology], Moscow, 1990, 494 p. (rus)
Puni A. Ts.Psikhologiya [Psychology], Moscow, 1984, 255 p. (rus)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2014 Slobozans`kij naukovo-sportivnij visnik [Slobozhanskyi herald of science and sport]
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Our publications make use of copyright CREATIVE COMMONS open access journals.
Authors published in this journal agree to the following terms:
1 The authors reserve the right of authorship of the work and pass the journal right of first publication of this work are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to freely distribute the published work with reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of this magazine.
2 The authors have the right to enter into separate agreements for additional non-exclusive distribution of work in the form in which it was published the magazine (such as work place electronic repository institution or publish as part of the monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of this magazine.