Facilitation as a Personality-Сentered Approach at the English Lessons at Secondary Schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32626/2227-6246.2020-47.206-230Keywords:
facilitative interaction, interpersonal communication, meaningless content, meaningful sense, facilitating personal development, positive acceptance of another person, active empathic listening.Abstract
The purpose of our research is: to show the role of facilitation at the educational
process at secondary school and to distinguish its main aspects; to underline the
principles of the influence of perception on the process of studying English by
schoolchildren.
Methods of the research. The following theoretical methods of the research
were used to solve the tasks formulated in the article: a categorical method,
structural and functional methods, the methods of the analysis, systematization,
modeling, generalization.
The results of the research. In our research we mean facilitation as a
person-centered approach, expressed in a global trust of a person, postulating
the actual tendency to grow, to develop and to realize his / her individual
potential. It was shown that facilitation is a key concept of non-directive,
client-centered or person-centered psychotherapy developed by C. Rogers.
For understanding a sense of facilitative interaction the main principles of the
theory of C. Rogers are: faith in original, constructive and creative wisdom of a
man; the belief in the content of socio-personal nature means the actualization
of the constructive personal potential of the individual in the processes of
interpersonal communication; the main are the concepts of «necessary and
sufficient conditions» of the interpersonal communication, facilitating personal
development and providing constructive personal changes («unconditional
positive acceptance of another person», «active empathic listening», «congruent
self-expression in communication»); the idea of the natural stages of the course
of the group process that occurs in the indicated social and personal conditions,
and of its equally regular therapeutic results.
It was underlined that it was very important for our research to distinguish
between two types of learning (teaching): meaningless content and meaningful
sense. The doctrine of the first type is compulsory, impersonal, intellectualized,
evaluated from the outside, aimed at the assimilation of knowledge. The doctrine
of the second type, on the contrary, is free and self-initiated, personally involved,
affecting the whole personality, evaluated by the pupil himself/herself, with the
aim to provide the assimilation of meanings as elements of personal experience.
The main tasks of a teacher are stimulation and initiation (facilitation) of
meaningful learning.
Conclusions. It was determined that socio-genetic mechanism of culture
transmission was: to facilitate, to stimulate, to activate, to create favorable
conditions, to give changes and make influences, to support, to help, to care, etc.
Person’s aspects of facilitation are: beliefs in the original, constructive and creative
wisdom of man as a value. Formative influence of facilitation as a process is:
conviction in the socio-personal nature that actualizes the constructive personal
potential of the individual in the process of interpersonal communication. A
result of facilitation is: the concept of the necessary and sufficient conditions for
interpersonal communication, facilitating personal development and providing
constructive personal changes.
Procedural side of facilitation at the English lessons at secondary school
comprises the principles of synergy – cooperation, interaction, a dialogue; truth
and openness; acceptance and truth; empathic understanding; skills formation.
The principles of facilitation in the process of interpersonal communication at
the English lessons are: the development of the individual educational route, to
provoke changes of pupils’ person through a series of bifurcations, stimulating
them to the process of creation, creating for this the conditions for interaction,
proposing various feedbacks between the subjects of learning (mutual survey –
dialogue, interview, group forms of communication and training, etc.); conclusions
according to individual and group contracts with pupils, organization of the
learning process in dyads, forming communication groups, creating conditions
for the formation of meaningful learning and personal development in general.
References
Балл Г. О., Папуча М. В. Діалогічність як форма існування і розвитку особистості. Ніжин : Міланик, 2007. 343 с.
Гончарук Н. М., Онуфрієва Л. А. Психологічний аналіз рівнів побудови комунікативних дій. Психолінгвістика. Психолингвистика. Psycholinguistics: Зб. наук. праць ДВНЗ «Переяслав-Хмельницький пед. ун-т імені Григорія Сковороди». Переяслав-Хмельницький : ФОП Домбровська Я. М., 2018. Вип. 24 (1). С. 97–117. DOI 10.31470/2309-1797-2018-24-1-97-117.
Mykhalchuck N. O., Ivashkevych E. Z. Psycholinguistic features of the development of social intelligence of the teacher. Психолінгвістика. Психолингвистика. Psycholinguistics: Зб. наук. праць ДВНЗ «Переяслав-Хмельницький пед. ун-т імені Григорія Сковороди». Переяслав-Хмельницький : ФОП Домбровська Я. М., 2018. Вип. 23 (1). С. 242–257. DOI 10.5281/zenodo.1211618.
Mykhalchuck N. O. Psychological context of the idea of understanding. Психолінгвістика. Психолингвистика. Psycholinguistics: Зб. наук. праць ДВНЗ «Переяслав-Хмельницький пед. ун-т імені Григорія Сковороди». Переяслав-Хмельницький : ФОП Домбровська Я. М., 2017. Вип. 22 (1). С. 163–175.
Newell, A., & Simon, H. (2009). Human problem Solving. New York : Englewood Cliffs. 920 p.
Rogers, C. R. (2009). A theory of therapy, personality and interpersonal relationship as developed in the client centered framework. New York : Mc. Grawn Hill. 80 p.
Rose, G., & Gilbert, J. (1992). The power of form: A psychoanalytic approach to aesthetic form. Madison : International University Press.
Scheingold, K., & Foundas, A. (1978). Rhymes for some reasons: Effect of rhyme on children’s memory for detail and sequence in simple narratives. Vol. 43 (3), ch. 2, pp. 1231–1234.
Stephens, W. (1998). Hypotheses and Evridence. New York : Harper & Row Publishers. 367 p.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright
The Editorial Board has the full right to publish original scientific papers containing results of theoretical and experimental research works which are not currently subject to review for publication in other scientific editions. The Author shall transfer to the editorial board of the Collection the right to spread the electronic version of the paper, as well as the electronic version of the paper translated into English (for papers originally submitted in Ukrainian and Russian) by all kinds of electronic means (placement at the official website of the Collection, electronic databases, repositories etc).
The Author of an article reserves the right to use materials of the paper, without approval with the editorial board and the founders of this Collection: a) partially or fully, for educational purposes; b) for writing own dissertation papers; c) for preparation of abstracts, conference reports and presentations.
The Author of an article can place electronic copies of the paper (including the final electronic version downloaded from the official website of the Collection) at:
- personal web resources of all Authors (websites, webpages, blogs etc.);
- web resources of the institutions where the Authors are employed (including electronic institutional repositories);
- non-profit public access web resources (for example, arXiv.org).
But in all cases, it is obligatory to have a bibliographic reference to the paper, or a hyperlink to its electronic copy placed at the official website of this Collection.