Psychological Analysis of Different Types of Discourse
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32626/2227-6246.2020-50.188-210Keywords:
discourse, discourse as a means of communicative action, discourse as a means of ideological influence, therapeutic discourse, a normal discourse, a scientific discourse, Pragmatic Psychology.Abstract
The purpose of this article is to define different approaches to the classification of discourse, to actualize the main criteria for the selection of types of discourse, to show concepts with the help of which we’ll describe great differences between some types of discourse, to propose examples of such exercises-tasks that will help to more clearly and specifically present the practical use of this scientific discourse, to display discourse as one of the main concepts of contemporary Pragmatic Psychology.
Methods of the research. The following theoretical methods of the research were used to solve the tasks formulated in the article: a categorical method, structural and functional methods, the methods of the analysis, systematization, modeling, generalization.
The results of the research. Scientists identify five types of discourse, which are implemented depending on the situation: discourse as a means of communicative action (for example, conversation for the purpose of information and education or a pre-arranged discussion); discourse as a means of ideological influence, that is the process of communicative action, which only takes the form of discourse (all forms of ideological justification); therapeutic discourse (psychoanalytic conversation between a doctor and a patient); a normal discourse, which has the aim to provide a scientific discussion; new forms of discourse (learning through discourse instead of discourse as a tool for information and instruction, a model of a free seminar discussion). According to these types in the article there were proposed examples of such exercises-tasks that will help pupils more clearly and specifically present the practical use of this scientific discourse.
Conclusions. We believe that Pragmatic Psychology can be shown as the independent interdisciplinary field of knowledge that closely interacts with Linguistic Pragmatics and Cognitive Psychology. Pragmatic Psychology in its scientific paradigm focuses on two basic, intertwined concepts – the meaning and the activity. Pragmatic Psychology is the core of a purely activity approach according to people’s speech, a global analysis of purposeful human use of sound structures, such as segmental and prosodic, tokens, word forms, schemes, phrases and sentences, different types of elementary speech acts and their complexes, communicative moves as chains, discourses of different types, etc. Thus, having had such a wide field of scientific research, Pragmatic Psychology is actualized on two levels of its analysis – a superficial (symbolic) level and a deep (cognitive-semantic) one. Thus, Pragmatic Psychology implies the subjective-activity space of the addressee (his / her pragmatic attitudes, deixis, features of quasi-communication), performativity, the theory of speech acts, various explicit and implicit ways of organizing the language code by the subjects of communication (press position, implication, implicative scripts, maxims of cooperative interaction of partners of communication, indirect speech acts, conditions of productivity and success of the process of communication in general); theoretical and applied aspects of relevance; psycholinguistic principles and mechanisms of communication; some aspects of the theory of speech interaction and conversational speech.References
Максименко С., Ткач Б., Литвинчук Л., Онуфрієва Л. Нейропсихолінгвістичне дослідження політичних гасел із зовнішньої реклами. Психолінгвістика. Психолингвистика. Psycholinguistics. Переяслав-Хмельницький : ФОП Домбровська Я. М., 2019. Вип. 26 (1). C. 246–264. DOI 10.31470/2309-1797-2019-26-1-246- 264. URL : https://psycholing-journal.com/index.php/journal/ article/view/715.
Хупавцева Н. О. Місце фасилітації у структурі пізнавальної діяльності на уроках англійської мови в закладах середньої освіти. Проблеми сучасної психології: Зб. наук. праць Кам’янець-Подільського національного університету імені Івана Огієнка, Інституту психології імені Г. С. Костюка НАПН України. Кам’янець-Подільський : ТОВ «Друкарня «Рута», 2020. Вип. 48. С. 293–312.
Blagovechtchenski, E., Gnedykh, D., Kurmakaeva, D., Mkrtychian, N., Kostromina, S., & Shtyrov, Y. (2019). Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of Wernicke’s and Broca’s areas in studies of language learning and word acquisition. Journal of Visualized Experiments. P. 37–59. URL : https://doi.org/10.3791/59159.
Brédart, S. (1991). Word interruption in self-repairing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. Vol. 20. P. 123–137. URL : https://doi.org/ 10.1007/bf01067879.
Cilibrasi, L., Stojanovik, V., Riddell, P., & Saddy, D. (2019). Sensitivity to Inflectional Morphemes in the Absence of Meaning: Evidence from a Novel Task. Journal of Psycholinguist Research. Vol. 48. P. 747–767. URL : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-019-09629-y.
Crookes, G. (1989). Planning and interlanguage variation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. Vol. 11. P. 367–383. URL : https://doi. org/10.1017/s0272263100008391.
Dam, L. (1990). Learner Autonomy in Practice: An experiment in learning and teaching. Autonomy in Language Learning. Vol. I. Gathercole (Ed.). Great Britain : Centre for Information on Language Teaching and Research. P. 56–63.
Mykhalchuk, Nataliia, & Kryshevych, Olga (2019). The peculiarities of the perception and understanding of Sonnets written by W. Shakespeare by the students of the Faculty of Foreign Languages. Психолінгвістика. Психолингвистика. Psycholinguistics: Зб. наукових праць. Серія: Психологія. Переяслав-Хмельницький : ФОП Домбровська Я. М. Вип. 26 (1). С. 265–285. DOI 10.31470/2309-1797-2019-26-1-265- 285.
Mykhalchuk, Nataliia, & Onufriieva, Liana (2020). Psycholinguistic features of representation of emotions by the concept of «Fear». Проблеми сучасної психології: Зб. наук. праць Кам’янець-Подільського національного університету імені Івана Огієнка, Інсти Переяслав-Хмельницький : ФОП Домбровська Я. М., 2019. Вип. 26 (1). C. 246–264. DOI 10.31470/2309-1797-2019-26-1-246- 264. URL : https://psycholing-journal.com/index.php/journal/ article/view/715.
Хупавцева Н. О. Місце фасилітації у структурі пізнавальної діяльності на уроках англійської мови в закладах середньої освіти. Проблеми сучасної психології: Зб. наук. праць Кам’янець-Подільського національного університету імені Івана Огієнка, Інституту психології імені Г. С. Костюка НАПН України. Кам’янець-Подільський : ТОВ «Друкарня «Рута», 2020. Вип. 48. С. 293–312.
Blagovechtchenski, E., Gnedykh, D., Kurmakaeva, D., Mkrtychian, N., Kostromina, S., & Shtyrov, Y. (2019). Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of Wernicke’s and Broca’s areas in studies of language learning and word acquisition. Journal of Visualized Experiments. P. 37–59. URL : https://doi.org/10.3791/59159.
Brédart, S. (1991). Word interruption in self-repairing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. Vol. 20. P. 123–137. URL : https://doi.org/ 10.1007/bf01067879.
Cilibrasi, L., Stojanovik, V., Riddell, P., & Saddy, D. (2019). Sensitivity to Inflectional Morphemes in the Absence of Meaning: Evidence from a Novel Task. Journal of Psycholinguist Research. Vol. 48. P. 747–767. URL : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-019-09629-y.
Crookes, G. (1989). Planning and interlanguage variation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. Vol. 11. P. 367–383. URL : https://doi. org/10.1017/s0272263100008391.
Dam, L. (1990). Learner Autonomy in Practice: An experiment in learning and teaching. Autonomy in Language Learning. Vol. I. Gathercole (Ed.). Great Britain : Centre for Information on Language Teaching and Research. P. 56–63.
Mykhalchuk, Nataliia, & Kryshevych, Olga (2019). The peculiarities of the perception and understanding of Sonnets written by W. Shakespeare by the students of the Faculty of Foreign Languages. Психолінгвістика. Психолингвистика. Psycholinguistics: Зб. наукових праць. Серія: Психологія. Переяслав-Хмельницький : ФОП Домбровська Я. М. Вип. 26 (1). С. 265–285. DOI 10.31470/2309-1797-2019-26-1-265- 285.
Mykhalchuk, Nataliia, & Onufriieva, Liana (2020). Psycholinguistic features of representation of emotions by the concept of «Fear». Проблеми сучасної психології: Зб. наук. праць Кам’янець-Подільського національного університету імені Івана Огієнка, Інституту психології імені Г. С. Костюка НАПН України. Кам’янець- Подільський : ТОВ «Друкарня «Рута». Вип. 48. С. 206–227.
Mykhalchuk, N., & Bihunova, S. (2019). The verbalization of the concept of «fear» in English and Ukrainian phraseological units. Cognitive Studies | Études cognitives. Vol. 19. P. 11. Warsaw (Poland). URL : https://doi.org/10.11649/cs.2043.
Mykhalchuk, N., & Ivashkevych, E. (2019). Psycholinguistic Characteris¬tics of Secondary Predication in Determining the Construction of a Peculiar Picture of the World of a Reader. Психолінгвістика. Психолингвистика. Psycholinguistics: Зб. наукових праць. Переяслав- Хмельницький : ФОП Домбровська Я. М. Вип. 25 (1). С. 215–231. DOI 10.31470/2309-1797-2019-25-1-215-231.
Vovk, M., Emishyants, O., Zelenko, O., Drobot, O., & Onufriieva, L. (2020). Psychological Features оf Experiences оf Frustration Situations іn Youth Age. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Re¬search. Vol. 8, Issue 01, January. P. 920–924. URL : http://www. ijstr.org/paper-references.php?ref=IJSTR-0120-28117.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright
The Editorial Board has the full right to publish original scientific papers containing results of theoretical and experimental research works which are not currently subject to review for publication in other scientific editions. The Author shall transfer to the editorial board of the Collection the right to spread the electronic version of the paper, as well as the electronic version of the paper translated into English (for papers originally submitted in Ukrainian and Russian) by all kinds of electronic means (placement at the official website of the Collection, electronic databases, repositories etc).
The Author of an article reserves the right to use materials of the paper, without approval with the editorial board and the founders of this Collection: a) partially or fully, for educational purposes; b) for writing own dissertation papers; c) for preparation of abstracts, conference reports and presentations.
The Author of an article can place electronic copies of the paper (including the final electronic version downloaded from the official website of the Collection) at:
- personal web resources of all Authors (websites, webpages, blogs etc.);
- web resources of the institutions where the Authors are employed (including electronic institutional repositories);
- non-profit public access web resources (for example, arXiv.org).
But in all cases, it is obligatory to have a bibliographic reference to the paper, or a hyperlink to its electronic copy placed at the official website of this Collection.
