Facilitative Interaction as a Multi-Level Human Activity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32626/2227-6246.2023-59.73-95Keywords:
facilitative interaction, a multi-level of human activity, the attributes of facilitation, cognitive activity, the subject of the activity, the functions of the subjectAbstract
The purpose of our research is to show facilitative interaction as a multilevel human activity, to show the significant constructive phenomena of facilitative interaction as a psychological status of the individual.
Methods of the research. The following theoretical methods of the research were used to solve the tasks formulated in the article: a categorical method, structural and functional methods, the methods of the analysis, systematization, modeling, generalization. Also, in our research we used empirical methods, such as statement experiment.
The results of the research. It was shown, that the concept “facilitation” reflects a conscious and purposeful activity as a phenomenon characteristic, first of all, of a teacher. Thus, we singled out the attributes of facilitation: 1) cognitive activity; 2) the subject of the activity; 3) the functions of the subject; 4) the object of the activity; 5) the motives of the activity; 6) the purpose of the activity; 7) functions of the activity; 8) the ways of performing activities; 9) methods of activity implementation (and means relevant for the implementation of these activities); 11) the result of the activity.
Conclusions. We showed the characteristics of facilitative interaction. We proved, that the Activity was the basis, means and positive condition for the development of the Personality. The Activity is the expedient transformation of the surrounding reality of people. We call activity “a unit of life”, mediated by the process of mental reflection. Also, outside activity there are neither means of the activity, nor signs, nor objects of art; there are no people outside the activity. Therefore, the activity is a purposeful, multi-level human activity. “Purposeful” is because “the subject” appears as its goal. “Multi-level” is because it includes into its structure of actions, secondary motivation, determined by the purpose and the tasks of the activity. And this, in turn, ensures the actualization of the main goal-motive of the activity by the individual. And, finally, the operation of the activity differs from the action in that it is not marked by a goal, but by the conditions of the activity in which this goal is explained. It is very necessary to distinguish the actions from the activities and from operations.
References
Honcharuk, Nataliia, & Onufriieva, Liana (2018). Psykholohichnyi analiz rivniv pobudovy komunikatyvnykh dii [Psychological analysis of the levels of construction of communicative actions]. Psykholinhvistyka. Psikholingvistika. Psycholinguistics – Psycholinguistics. Psycholinguistics. Psycholinguistics, 24(1), 97–117. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.31470/2309-1797-2018-24-1-97-117.
Ivashkevych, Er., & Komarnitska, L. (2020). Psychological aspects of comics as the paraliterary genres. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats «Problemy suchasnoi psykholohii» – Collection of research papers “Problems of modern Psychology”, 49, 106–130. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.32626/2227-6246.2020-49.106-130.
Alahmadi, A., & Foltz, A. (2020). Effects of Language Skills and Strategy Use on Vocabulary Learning Through Lexical Translation and Inferencing. Journal of Psycholinguist Research, 49(6), 975–991. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-020-09720-9.
Alahmadi, A., Shank, C., & Foltz, A. (2018). Vocabulary learning strategies and vocabulary size: Insights from educational level and learner styles. Vocabulary Learning and Instruction, 7(1), 1–21. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.7820/vli.v07.1.alahmadi.
Alyami, M., & Mohsen, M.A. (2019). The use of a reading lexicon to aid contextual vocabulary acquisition by EFL Arab learners. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 48(5), 1005–1023. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-019-09644-z.
Arrington, C.N., Kulesz, P.A., Francis, D.J., Fletcher, J.M., & Barnes, M.A. (2014). The contribution of attentional control and working memory to reading comprehension and decoding. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(5), 325–346. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2014.902461.
Astle, D., & Scerif, G. (2011). Interactions between attention and visual short-term memory (VSTM): What can be learnt from individual and developmental differences? Neuropsychologia, 49, 1435–1445. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.12.001.
Conners, F.A. (2009). Attentional control and the simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 22, 591–613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9126-x.
Dale, R., & Duran, N.D. (2011). The cognitive dynamics of negated sentence verification. Cognitive Science, 35(5), 983–996.
de la Garza, B., & Harris, R.J. (2017). Acquiring foreign language vocabulary through meaningful linguistic context: Where is the limit to vocabulary learning? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 46(2), 395–413. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-016-9444-0.
Drigas, A., & Karyotaki, M. (2017). Attentional control and other executive functions. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 12(3), 219–233. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v12i03.6587.
Ehri, L.C., Nunes, S.R., Willows, D.M., Schuster, B.V., Yaghoub-Zadeh, Z., & Shanahan, T. (2001). Phonemic awareness instruction helps children learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel’s meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 250–287. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.36.3.2.
Engle, R. W. (2002). Working memory capacity as executive function. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 19–23. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00160.
Falé, I., Costa, A., & Luegi, P. (2016). Reading aloud: Eye movements and prosody. Speech Prosody, 169. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2016-169.
Gathercole, S.E., Pickering, S.J., Ambridge, B., & Wearing, H. (2004). The structure of working memory from 4 to 15 years of age. Developmental Psychology, 40(2), 177–190. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.40.2.177.
Greco, M., Canal, P., Bambini, V., & Moro, A. (2020). Modulating “Surprise” with Syntax: A Study on Negative Sentences and Eye-Movement Recording. Journal of Psycholinguist Research, 49(3), 415–434. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-020-09691-x.
Hecht, S.A., Torgesen, J.K., Wagner, R.K., & Rashotte, C.A. (2001). The relations between phonological processing abilities and emerging individual differences in mathematical computation skills: A longitudinal study from second to fifth grades. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 79(2), 192–227. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.2000.2586.
Heidari, K. (2019). Willingness to communicate: A predictor of pushing vocabulary knowledge from receptive to productive. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 48(4), 903–920. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-019-09639-w.
Mykhalchuk, N., & Bihunova, S. (2019). The verbalization of the concept of “fear” in English and Ukrainian phraseological units. Cognitive Studies | Études cognitives, Warsaw (Poland), 19, 11. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.11649/cs.2043.
Pimperton, H., & Nation, K. (2010). Suppressing irrelevant information from working memory: Evidence for domain-specific deficits in poor comprehenders. Journal of Memory and Language, 62(4), 380–391. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2010.02.005.
Phani Krishna, P., Arulmozi, S., Shiva Ram, M., & Mishra, R. Kumar (2020). Sensory Perception in Blind Bilinguals and Monolinguals. Journal of Psycholinguist Research, 49(4), 631–639. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-020-09689-5.
Rezaei, A., & Mousanezhad Jeddi, E. (2020). The Contributions of Attentional Control Components, Phonological Awareness, and Working Memory to Reading Ability. Journal of Psycholinguist Research, 49(1), 31–40. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-019-09669-4.
Shiva Ram, M., Bhardwaj, R., & Phani Krishna, P. (2017). Psychological pleasure in reading and visual cognition under colour luminance: A psycholinguistic approach. Psychology Cognitive Science Open Journal, 3(4), 110–115. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.17140/PCSOJ-3-132.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Khupavtseva Nataliia, Onufriieva Liana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright
The Editorial Board has the full right to publish original scientific papers containing results of theoretical and experimental research works which are not currently subject to review for publication in other scientific editions. The Author shall transfer to the editorial board of the Collection the right to spread the electronic version of the paper, as well as the electronic version of the paper translated into English (for papers originally submitted in Ukrainian and Russian) by all kinds of electronic means (placement at the official website of the Collection, electronic databases, repositories etc).
The Author of an article reserves the right to use materials of the paper, without approval with the editorial board and the founders of this Collection: a) partially or fully, for educational purposes; b) for writing own dissertation papers; c) for preparation of abstracts, conference reports and presentations.
The Author of an article can place electronic copies of the paper (including the final electronic version downloaded from the official website of the Collection) at:
- personal web resources of all Authors (websites, webpages, blogs etc.);
- web resources of the institutions where the Authors are employed (including electronic institutional repositories);
- non-profit public access web resources (for example, arXiv.org).
But in all cases, it is obligatory to have a bibliographic reference to the paper, or a hyperlink to its electronic copy placed at the official website of this Collection.
