Psychodiagnostic Research of a Dialogue in Culturally Oriented Surrounding in the Process of School Studying

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32626/2227-6246.2023-59.96-117

Keywords:

a dialogue, culturally oriented surrounding, low level of validity of opinions, a discussion, educational activity

Abstract

The purpose of our research is to provide psychodiagnostic research of a dialogue in culturally oriented surrounding in the process of school studying.

Methods of the research. The following theoretical methods of the research were used to solve the tasks formulated in the article: the categorical method, structural and functional methods, the methods of the analysis, systematization, modeling, generalization. The experimental method was the method of organizing empirical research.

The results of the research. We proved that the reasons of a low level of validity of opinions and judgments by pupils are: 1) unsuccessful organization of the discussion at the English language classes; 2) as a consequence of the first reason – pupils are not familiar with the discussion as a form of educational activity, they do not know how to behave at such a lesson, and most often choose a standard position of a “pupil” who listens carefully to the teacher, answers his/ her questions concisely, clearly, regardless of schoolchild’s point of view; 3) 68% of pupils do not understand why they need to justify their opinions (because they always express only those opinions that are in their textbooks or that were expressed by the teacher at the previous lesson); 4) 32% of schoolchildren are afraid to substantiate their statement “incorrectly”, “ not methodically” and to get a bad mark.

Conclusions. We distinguish, on the one hand, a dialogue, and on the other one – a simple conversation. A dialogue is understood as a mutual communication that has specific features: thematic focus or a problem solving, getting twoway information, the combination of thematic focus with two-way transmission of information that helps to solve a common problem in any way. Also we distinguish between linguistic and psychological understanding of a dialogue, emphasizing that in the process of psychological studying of a dialogue it is necessary to pay a great attention to both the informative exchange between partners and the features of their relationships, in particular their aspect of role interaction.

References

Alahmadi, A., & Foltz, A. (2020). Effects of Language Skills and Strategy Use on Vocabulary Learning Through Lexical Translation and Inferencing. Journal of Psycholinguist Research, 49(6), 975–991. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-020-09720-9.

Ball, G.О. (1995). Problema humanizatsii osvity ta deiaki napriamky yii rozviazannia [The problem of humanization of education and some of its directions of solution]. Psykholohichni zasady humanizatsii zahalnoi serednioi osvity – Psychological principles of humanization of general secondary education. Rivne. P. 10–16 [in Ukrainian].

Batel, E. (2020). Context Effect on L2 Word Recognition: Visual Versus Auditory Modalities. Journal of Psycholinguist Research, 49, 223–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-019-09683-6.

Blagovechtchenski, E., Gnedykh, D., Kurmakaeva, D., Mkrtychian, N., Kostromina, S., & Shtyrov, Y. (2019). Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of Wernicke’s and Broca’s areas in studies of language learning and word acquisition. Journal of Visualized Experiments, 37– 59. https://doi.org/10.3791/59159.

Brédart, S. (1991). Word interruption in self-repairing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 20, 123–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01067879.

Cilibrasi, L., Stojanovik, V., Riddell, P., & Saddy, D. (2019). Sensitivity to Inflectional Morphemes in the Absence of Meaning: Evidence from a Novel Task. Journal of Psycholinguist Research, 48, 747–767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-019-09629-y.

Crookes, G. (1989). Planning and interlanguage variation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 367–383. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263100008391.

de Bot, K. (1992). A bilingual production model: Levelt’s “speaking” model adapted. Applied Linguistics, 13, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/13.1.1.

Derwing, T.M., Munro, M.M., Thomson, R.I., & Rossiter, M.J. (2009). The relationship between L1 fluency and L2 fluency development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, 533–557. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263109990015.

Dijkgraaf, A., Hartsuiker, R.J., & Duyck, W. (2017). Predicting upcoming information in native-language and non-native-language auditory word recognition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20(5), 917–930.

Ivashkevych, Er., & Komarnitska, L. (2020). Psychological aspects of comics as the paraliterary genres. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats «Problemy suchasnoi psykholohii» – Collection of research papers “Problems of modern psychology”, 49, 106–130. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.32626/2227-6246.2020-49.106-130.

Ivashkevych, Ed., & Onufriieva, L. (2021). Social intelligence of a teacher as a factor of the stimulation of cognitive interests of students. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats «Problemy suchasnoi psykholohii» – Collection of research papers “Problems of modern psychology”, 54, 57–77. URL: https://doi.org/10.32626/2227-6246.2021-54.57-77.

Ivashkevych, Er., Perishko, I., Kotsur, S., & Chernyshova, S. (2020). Psycholinguistic Content of Complements in English and Ukrainian. Psycholinguistics. Psykholinhvistyka. Psikholingvistika – Psycholinguistics. Psycholinguistics. Psycholinguistics, 28(2), 24–55. URL: https://doi.org/10.31470/2309-1797-2020-28-2-24-55.

Maksymenko, S., Тkach, B., Lytvynchuk, L., & Onufriieva, L. (2019). Neiropsykholinhvistychne doslidzhennia politychnykh hasel iz zovnishnoi reklamy [A neuropsycholinguistic research of political slogans from outdoor advertising]. Psycholinguistics. Psykholinhvistyka. Psikholingvistika – Psycholinguistics. Psycholinguistics. Psycholinguistics, 26 (1), 246–264 [in Ukrainian].

Murphy, S., Melandri, E., & Bucci, W. (2021). The Effects of Story-Telling on Emotional Experience: An Experimental Paradigm. Journal of Psycholinguist Research, 50(1), 117–142. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-021-09765-4.

Mykhalchuk, N.О., Ivashkevych, Е.Z., & Ivashkevych, Е.Е. (2023). Psykhodiahnostychna metodyka dlia vyznachennia rivniu obgruntovanosti vyslovlenykh shkoliaramy dumok [Psychodiagnostic Test for determining the level of validity of opinions expressed by schoolchildren]. Methodical manual. Rivne: Rivne State University of the Humanities [in Ukrainian].

O’Brien, I., Segalowitz, N., Freed, B., & Collentine, J. (2007). Phonological memory predicts second language oral fluency gains in adults. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, 557–581. https://doi.org/10.1017/s027226310707043x.

O’Donnell, J., MacGregor, L., Dabrowski, J., Oestreicher, J., & Romero, J. (1994). Construct validity of neuropsychological tests of conceptual and attentional abilities. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 50, 596–600.

Rogers, C.R. (1983). Freedom to learn for the 80’s. Columbus.

Valis, M., Slaninova, G., Prazak, P., Poulova, P., Kacetl, J., & Klimova, B. (2019). Impact of Learning a Foreign Language on the Enhancement of Cognitive Functions Among Healthy Older Population. Journal of Psycholinguist Research, 48, 1311–1318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-019-09659-6.

Ware, C., Damnee, S., Djabelkhir, L., Cristancho, V., Wu, Y.H., & Benovici, J. (2017). Maintaining cognitive functioning in healthy seniors with a technology-based foreign language program: A pilot feasibility study. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 9, 42. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2017.00042.

Zuniga, M., & Simard, D. (2019). Factors Influencing L2 Self-repair Behavior: The Role of L2 Proficiency, Attentional Control and L1 Self-repair Behavior. Journal of Psycholinguist Research, 48, 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-018-9587-2.

Downloads

Published

2023-03-31

How to Cite

Mykhalchuk, N., & Koval, I. (2023). Psychodiagnostic Research of a Dialogue in Culturally Oriented Surrounding in the Process of School Studying. Collection of Research Papers "Problems of Modern Psychology", (59), 96–117. https://doi.org/10.32626/2227-6246.2023-59.96-117