Psychology of the Interaction of Understanding and Forecasting Processes in Creative Mathematical Thinking

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32626/2227-6246.2023-59.118-134

Keywords:

creative mathematical thinking, understanding of a mathematical problem, prediction of thinking results

Abstract

Based on the results of the analysis of research on mathematical thinking, its creative nature has been ascertained. The results of research on creative mathematical thinking were analyzed and the expediency of studying the psychological essence of the interaction of thought processes of understanding and forecasting when solving creative mathematical problems was ascertained.

The aim of the article is to find out the psychological essence of the interaction of thought processes of understanding and forecasting in creative mathematical thinking.

To study the interaction of the processes of understanding and forecasting in mathematical thinking, the method of analyzing students’ search actions during solving creative mathematical problems of different classes was used.

The results of the research. It was established that creative mathematical thinking is a complete system of interrelated actions, with the help of which the thinking mathematical result is achieved. It was established that the processes of understanding mathematical problems and predicting thinking results function throughout the entire process of solving mathematical problems. It was found that the content of search actions aimed at understanding the problem and predicting thinking results depend on the stages of solving the problem (study of the condition, search for a solution, verification of the found solution), in which their procedural and dynamic side is not only manifested, but is also being formed. At the same time, the process of understanding a creative mathematical problem and the process of forecasting are complementary. It is established that the understanding of the condition of the problem forms the content of forecasting actions, and the process of forecasting contributes to the formation of understanding of the mathematical problem. It was established that in the search mathematical process it is not possible to record such a state of understanding of the problem that would ensure the emergence of a hypothesis regarding the solution. It has been found that forecasting, which takes place throughout the entire search process, can generate a solution hypothesis at different stages of the solution, with different states of understanding of the mathematical problem. The hypothesis of solving the problem is an indicator of the state of understanding of the problem, and its approbation contributes to deepening the understanding of the essence of the problem itself. At the same time, the content of the hypothesis, its approval determines the state of understanding of the problem.

Conclusion. The process of the subject’s understanding of a creative mathematical problem and the process of prediction take place throughout all stages of the solution process and are mutually complementary.

References

Adu-Gyamfi, K., Bossé, M. J., & Chandler, K. (2017). Student connections between algebraic and graphical polynomial representations in the context of a polynomial relation. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(5). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9730-1.

Firmasari, S., Sulaiman, H., Hartono, W., & Noto, M. S. (2019). Rigorous mathematical thinking based on gender in the real analysis course. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 11574 (042106). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042106.

Francisco, J. M. (2013). The mathematical beliefs and behavior of high school students: Insights from a longitudinal study. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(3), 481–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.02.012.

Hidayah, I. N., Sa’dijah, C., Subanji, S., & Sudirman, S. (2020). Characteristics of Students’ Abductive Reasoning in Solving Algebra Problems. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(3), 347–362.

Jäder, J., Lithner, J., & Sidenvall, J. (2020). Mathematical problem solving in textbooks from twelve countries. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(7), 1120–1136.

Jonsson, B., Mossegård, J., Lithner, J., & Karlsson Wirebring, L. (2022). Creative Mathematical Reasoning: Does Need for Cognition Matter? Frontiers in Psychology, 6207. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.797807.

Kostiuk, H.S. (1989). Navchalno-vykhovnyi protses i psykholohichnyi rozvytok osobystosti[ Educational process and psychological development of personality]. Kyiv: Radianska shkola [in Ukrainiаn].

Kovalenko A.B. (2015) Problema rozuminnia v pratsiakh ukrainskykh psykholohiv [The problem of understanding in the works of Ukrainian psychologists]. Teoretychni i prykladni problemy psykholohii – Theoretical and applied problems of psychology, 1(36), 190–197 [in Ukrainian].

Mielicki, M. K., & Wiley, J. (2016). Alternative representations in algebraic problem solving: When are graphs better than equations? The Journal of Problem Solving, 9 (1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.7771/1932-6246.1181.

Moiseienko L.A. (2003). Psykholohiia tvorchoho matematychnoho myslennia [Psychology of creative mathematical thinking]. Ivano-Frankivsk: Fakel [in Ukrainiаn].

Moiseienko Lidiia, Shehda Liubov (2021). Thinking styles of Understanding Creative Mathematical Problems in the Process of Solving Them. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats «Problemy suchasnoi psykholohii» – Collection of research papers “Problems of modern psychology”, 51, 142–164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32626/2227-6246.2021-51.142-164.

Molyako V.A. (2007) Tvorcheskaya krnstruktologiya (prolegomenyi) [Creative Constructology (prolegomen)]. Kyiv: Osvita Ukrainy [in Ukrainiаn].

Syarifuddin, S., Nusantara, T., Qohar, A., & Muksar, M. (2020). Students’ Thinking Processes Connecting Quantities in Solving Covariation Mathematical Problems in High School Students of Indonesia. Participatory Educational Research, 7(3), 59–78. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.20.35.7.3

Timo Reuter, Wolfgang Schnotz, & Renate Rasch (2015). Drawings and Tables as Cognitive Tools for Solving Non-Routine Word Problems in Primary School. American Journal of Educational Research, 3 (11), 1387–1397. doi: 10.12691/education-3-11-7.

Tohir, M., Maswar, M., Atikurrahman, M., Saiful, S., & Pradita, D. A. R. (2020). Prospective Teachers’ Expectations of Students’ Mathematical Thinking Processes in Solving Problems. European Journal of Educational Research, 9 (4), 1735–1748. http://dx.doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.4.1735

Wong, T. T. Y. (2018). Is conditional reasoning related to mathematical problem solving? Developmental Science, 21(5), 12644.

Yunita, D. R., Maharani, A., & Sulaiman, H. (2019, April). Identifying of rigorous mathematical thinking on olympic students in solving nonroutine problems on geometry topics. In 3rd Asian Education Symposium (AES 2018). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/aes-18.2019.111.

Downloads

Published

2023-03-31

How to Cite

Moiseienko, L., & Shehda, L. (2023). Psychology of the Interaction of Understanding and Forecasting Processes in Creative Mathematical Thinking. Collection of Research Papers "Problems of Modern Psychology", (59), 118–134. https://doi.org/10.32626/2227-6246.2023-59.118-134