Unveiling the Operational Model and Mechanism of Restorative Justice in Bangladesh
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25128/2520-6230.26.1.8Keywords:
restorative justice, community-based disputes, restorative models, mitigation strategyAbstract
The practice of restorative justice in Bangladesh represents a new dimension for addressing community-based disputes and injustices. The interventions employed by the restorative institution initiate various steps to resolve disputes and unlawful activities that harm social relationships and the sense of solidarity. This article aims to describe the functions of restorative justice in Bangladesh by including its practiced models and methods. Restorative justice practitioners (RJP) are trained to facilitate the justice process while maintaining a balance between the victim and the offender. The restorative justice agencies adhere to national guidelines for approaching community-based justice and interventions. National manuals guide the RJPs and flowcharts prepared for restorative functions. Relevant RJPs have been interviewed from selected areas where restorative services are available. Using a semi-structured interview schedule, the required interviews were conducted and organized. Ethical considerations and moral demands have been upheld while collecting field-level data. As a qualitative study, thematic analysis techniques were applied to present the collected data by synthesizing its different steps and templates. By showcasing the collected data and events, the article illustrates the functional strength and effectiveness in resolving community-based disputes, injustices, discrimination, violations of personal rights and reputation, and other community-related dysfunctions. As a new dimension of a global trend, restorative justice continues to gain acceptance and applicability among people, fostering trust and confidence by addressing all types of reconcilable disputes and criminal victimizations. By interpreting the presented data, policy-level interventions and initiatives can be developed by relevant personnel to implement restorative services with appropriate treatment and recognition.
References
Akram, M. S. (2017). Law Campaign: The Benefits of Restorative Justice. The Daily Star (24 January 2017). Retrieved from: https://www.thedailystar.net/law-our-rights/the-benefits-restorative-justice-1350091.
Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, Shame and Reintegration. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (2nd edition). London: Sage Publications.
Dussich, J. P. J. (2000). Victimology: Past, Present and Future. Japan: Tokiwa International Victimology Institute. Tokiwa University Victimology Graduate School.
Erbe, C. (2010). What Is the Role of Professionals in Restorative Justice?. In: Zehr, H. and Toews, B. (2010). Restorative Justice. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc.
GIZ Bangladesh. (2013). Training manual on Restorative Justice. Dhaka: GIZ Press.
Hassan, M. and Ali, T. O. (2008). A Study of MLAA Intervention: Promoting Village Court and Arbitration Council. Madaripur: Madaripur Legal Aid Association (MLAA).
Hoque, M. R. and Zarif, M. M. M. (2019). Traditional Shalish system for rural dispute resolution in Bangladesh: An analytical study of its structure and operational mechanism. Journal of IIUC Studies (Vol.16).
Islam, M. M., Jahan, N., and Hossain, M. D. (2018). Violence against Women and Mental Disorder: A Qualitative Study in Bangladesh. Journal of Tropical Medicine and Health. Retrieved from: https://tropmedhealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s41182-018-0085.
John, S. (2002). Third Parties, Victims and the Criminal Justice System. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
Johnstone, G. (2001). Restorative Justice: Ideas, values, Debates (2nd Edition). New York: Routledge.
Morris, A. and Maxwell, G. (2001). Restorative Justice in New Zealand: Family Group Conferences as a Case Study. UK: John Wiley & Sons.
Pranis, K. (2005). The little book of circle processes. Pennsylvania: Good Books.
Roberts, J. V. (2015). Criminal Justice: A Very Short Introduction. London: Oxford University Press.
Sarker, A. H. (2001). Juvenile Delinquency: Dhaka City Experience. Dhaka: Human Nursery for Development.
Sheikh, M. R. and Karim, M. R. (2013). Victim Support Services in Bangladesh: Nature and Challenges. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338969202.
Sikder, P. (2016). Village Courts: A Dilemma Within... . In: The Daily Star (April 05, 2016). Dhaka: Bangladesh. Retrieved from: https://www.thedailystar.net/law-our-rights/village-courts-dilemma-within-1204333.
Talukdar, M. R. I. (2019). Rural Justice System in Bangladesh: Village Courts. International Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Studies. Vol. 1. Issue-2. Retrieved from: https://www.socialstudiesjournal.com/archives/2019/vol1issue2/PartA/2-1-13-763.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (3rd Edition), Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Md. Tawohidul Haque

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Social Work and Education is an open access journal. Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Creative Commons «Attribution» 4.0