ORIGINS OF MODERN DIPLOMACY: AKSUM, SYRIA AND BIZANTIUM BETWEEN THE WEST AND THE EAST
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.3.2018.147117Keywords:
religion diplomacy, principle of continuity of diplomacy, Byzantium and Aksum.Abstract
Purpose of the article. This article conceptualizes diplomacy in diachronic as a political practice of negotiating peace, trade, and war through standardized communications with other foreign policy actors. It is assumed that although the forms and conditions for the implementation of diplomacy changed over time, the foundations of such interaction were developed in ancient times in numerous and diverse networks of contacts and exchanges not only of large and small proto-states of the world, but also between fractions, parties, aristocratic unions, trading companies. Methodology. Historical-logical and systematic methods of analysis are used to clarify the origins of the phenomenon of diplomacy as a mechanism of "international relations", "external relations", trade of the elite of Axum. The scientific novelty consists in positioning the diplomacy of the Aksumite kingdom as a mechanism for resonating the social dimensions of human existence (spirituality, culture, economic and political interests) of ancient Rome, Byzantium in the synergistic effect of the further development of communications of the East and the West. Conclusions. During its heyday, the kingdom of Aksum was the most prominent and important example of the African proto-power. During this period Aksum kingdom made the greatest contribution to the history of mankind. Facts from the eventful history of Axum, his political and commercial influence, active participation in world politics of that time allow us to speak of the outstanding role of Aksum in world history. Aksum kingdoms' elite had strong ties with the peoples of Tropical Africa, the high civilizations of the Mediterranean, the population of the Nile Valley, South Arabia, the Persian Kingdom (including Mesopotamia), India, Ceylon and other distant countries. The multi-vector policy of the Aksumite elite was a product of a long historical development in conditions that are significantly different from the conditions in which civilizations of Europe and Asia developed.
References
Anderson M.S. (1993). The Rise of Modern Diplomacy, 1450-1919. London: Routledge. 330 p. [in Eng-lish]
Arbagi, M. (1994). Byzantine Diplomacy. Speculum: A Journal of Medieval Studies. 69 (4). pp. 1272–1274. [in English]
Becker, A. (2012). La délégation de pouvoir dans la diplomatie romano-barbare au Ve siècle. Hiérarchie des pouvoirs, délégation du pouvoir et responsabilité des administrateurs dans l'Antiquité et au Moyen Âge. Metz, 2012, pp. 51–78 [in English]
Cerion Lydia (1970). La diplomazia sforzesca nella seconda meta Á del Quattrocento e i suoi cifrari segreti. – 2 v. – Rome: Il centro di ricerca. 169, LXXII p. di tav. 1: Testo. -XXXVII, 291 p. [in English]
Denysenko, A.V. (2012). Spiritual diplomacy [Dukhovna dyplomatiia]. Kyiv: Presa Ukrainy. [in Ukrainian]
Diehl, Ch. (1947). Les Grands Problèmes de l'Histoire Byzantine. Paris: P., Colin. [in English]
Ephraim, I. (2012). The Ethiopian Orthodox Tawahido Church. Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press. [in English]
Finneran, N. (2007). Ethiopian Christian material culture: the international context. Aksum, the Mediterra-nean and the Syriac worlds in the fifth to seventh centuries. Incipient Globalization? Long-Distance Contacts In The Sixth Century. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp .76–89. [in English]
Frigo D. (2000). “Small States” and diplomacy: Mantua and Modena / Politics and Diplomacy in Early Modern Italy: The Structure of Diplomatic Practice, 1450-1800/ Translated by Adrian Belton. – New York: Cambridge University Press., - P. 147-76 [in English]
Fubini R. (2000) Diplomacy and Government in the Italian City States of the Fifteenth Century (Florence and Venice) / Politics and Diplomacy in Early Modern Italy: The Structure of Diplomatic Practice, 1450-1800/ Trans-lated by Adrian Belton. – New York: Cambridge University Press. – P. 25-48; [in English]
Fubini Riccardo. (1981) Appunti sui rapporti diplomatici fra il dominio sforzesco e Firenze medicea. Modi e tecniche dell’ambasciata dalle trattative per la lega italica alla missione di Sacramoro da Rimini (1451-1473) / Gli Sforza a Milano e in Lombardia e i loro rapporti con gli Stati italiani ed europei (1450-1535). Atti del Convegno interna-zionale, Milano, 18-21 maggio.- Milano, Cisalpino-Goliardica, 1982. – P. 291-334. [in English]
Fubini, Riccardo. (1982).La figura politica dell’ambasciatore negli sviluppi dei regimi oligarchici quattrocenteschi. Abbozzo di una ricerca (a guisa di lettera aperta) / Forme e tecniche del potere nella città (secoli XIV-XVII), a cura di Sergio BERTELLI, Annali della Facoltà di Scienze Politiche dell’Università di Perugia, 16, 1979-1980, Perugia s.a., 1982. – P. 33-59. [in English]
Gram-Skoldager K. Bringing the Diplomat Back / Elements of a New Historical Researc Agenda’EUI Working Papers (2008). Електронне джерело: Адреса: http:/ /cadmus. eui. eu/ bitstream/ handle/1814/ 15952/ RSCAS_2011_13. pdf? sequence=1 5 [in English]
Grosjean Alexia. (2003). An Unofficial Alliance: Scotland and Sweden, 1569-1654 / Alexia Grosjean, Steve Murdoc. – Leiden: Brill. – 2005. xx + 393 p. – ( The Northern World, Volume: 5). [in English]
Haas, C. (2008). Mountain Constantines: The Christianization of Aksum and Iberia. Journal of Late Antiquity. Journal of Late Antiquity, 1.1 (Spring), pp. 101–126. [in English]
Hall, Ian Isa. (2006). The international thought of Martin Wight. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. [in English]
Kazhdan, Alexander. (1990).‘The Notion of Byzantine Diplomacy’. Byzantine Diplomacy. Papers from the Twenty-Fourth Spring Symposium of Byzantine Studies. Cambridge, March 1990, pp. 3–21. [in English]
Kobishanov, Yu.M. (1966). Aksum. Moscow: Nauka. [in English]
Margaroli Paolo. (1992). Diplomazia e stati rinascimentali: le ambascerie sforzesche fino alla conclusione della Lega italica (1450-1455). – Milano: Pubblicazioni della Facoltà di lettere e filosofia dell'Università di Milano. – 361 р. – (Sezione a cura dell'Istituto di Storia medioevale e moderna). [in English]
Mattingly G. (1955).Renaissance Diplomacy. The accounts of early modern diplomacy in almost every survey of diplomacy written in the past half decade have been heavily reliant upon Mattingly’s work. – Boston. – 284 р. [in English]
Morris, R. (1986). Сhurch and People in Byzantium. Society for the Promotion of Byzantine Studies. Twentieth Spring Symposium of Byzantine Studies, Manchester 1986. [in English]
Munro-Hay, S. (1991). Aksum: An African Civilization of Late Antiquity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. [in English]
Nechaev, E. (2014). Embassies – Negotiations – Gifts. Systems of East Roman Diplomacy in Late Antiqui-ty. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag. [in English]
Neumann, Iver B. (2015). Sited diplomacy. Diplomatic Cultures and International Politics: Translations, Spaces and Alternatives. London: Routledge New Diplomacy Studies. Routledge, pp. 79–92. [in English]
Norwich, J. J. (1978). Byzantium. The Apogee. London: Viking. [in English]
Obolensky, D. (1961). The Principles and Methods of Byzantine Diplomacy. «Actes du X11-е Congrès In-ternational d'études byzantines. Ochride, 10–16 septembre, Beograd, T.1, pp. 45–61. [in English]
Obolensky, D. (1978). A Byzantine Grand Embassy to Russia in 1400. Byzantine and Modern Greek Stud-ies, Vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 123–132. [in English]
Obolensky, D. (2002). Un commonwealth medieval: Bizanţul. Europa de Răsărit, 500–1453, traducere de Claudia Dumitriu. Editura Corint. Bucureşti, pp. 330–338. [in English]
Oikonomides, N. (1992). Byzantine diplomacy, A.D. 1204–1453: means and ends. Byzantine Diplomacy. Papers from the Twenty-fourth Spring Symposium of Byzantine Studies (Cambridge, March 1990) [Society for the Promotion of Byzantine Studies. Publications 1], Variorum, Aldershot – Hampshire pp. 73–88. [in English]
Osborne Toby (2007). Dynasty and Diplomacy in the Court of Savoy Political Culture and the Thirty Years War. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. – 236 р. – (Cambridge studies in Italian history and culture) [in English]
Ossola C. (1987). La frontiera da stato a nazione. Il caso Piemonte, Home / C. Ossola, C. Raffestin, M. Ricciardi (eds.). – Roma: Bulzoni editore. – 426 p.: map [in English]
Ostrogorsky, G. (1956). The Byzantine Emperor and the Hierarchical World Order. The Slavonic and East European Review, Vol. 35, no. 84 (Dec.), p. 14. [in English]
Ostrogorsky, G. (2002). Byzantine History. Translated from German by Anatolii Onyshko. Lviv: Litopys. [in English]
Phillipson, D. (2011–2012). W.Aksum and the Northern Horn of Africa. Archaeology International, no. 15, pp .29–32. [in English]
Pikin, A.V. (2016). Political missions of church leaders in the system of the embassy interaction of the end of the IV – first quarter of the VI century: PHD Thesis. Nizhegorodsk State University named after N.I. Lobachevsky. Ivanovo. [in English]
Rosemary, M. (1992). Divine Diplomacy in the late Eleventh Century. Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies, 16(1), January, pp. 147–157. [in English]
Ruffini, G. (1998). Ethiopia and Rome: The Birth of Byzantine Religious Diplomacy Giovanni Ruffini. Ex Posto Facto, Spring, pp. 65–75. [in English]
Salvador, M. (2016). The African Prester John and the Birth of Ethiopian-European Relations, 1402–15). Routledge. [in English]
Salvadore M. T. (2010). The Ethiopian Age of Exploration: Prester John's Discovery of Europe, 1306-1458. // Journal of World History. - Vol. 21.- No. 4.- December. - P. 593-627 [in English]
Selassie, Y. G. (2011). Plague as a Possible Factor for the Decline and Collapse of the Aksumite Empire: a New Interpretation. ITYOPIS : Northeast African Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities. Mekelle University, Tigray, Ethiopia, Vol.1, pp. 36–61. [in English]
Shepard, J. (1992) Byzantine Diplomacy.Papers from the Twenty–Fourth Spring Symposium of Byzan-tine Studies, Cambridge, March 1990. Society for the Promotion of Byzantine Studies. Aldershot, Hampshire: Variorum, p. 5. [in English]
Sirotenko, V.T. (1975). The history of international relations in Europe in the second half of the IV – the be-ginning of the VI century. Perm. [in English]
Straub, J. (1989). Studien zur Geschichte der römischen Spätantik. Athen: Pelasgos Verlag. [in English]
Telea, Marius. (2015). Mission and/or conversion: strategies of Byzantine diplomacy. International Journal of Orthodox Theology, 6:3, pp .81–105. [in English]
Udaltsova, Z.V. (1992). Byzantine Empire in the Early Middle Ages (IV–XII). History of Europe: from ancient times to our days. Vol. 2: Medieval Europe. Moscow: Nauka, pp. 85–111. [in English]
Watkins J. (2008). Toward a New Diplomatic History of Medieval and Early Modern Europe // Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies. – 2008. – xxxviii. – P. 1-14 [in English]
Wight, M. (1977). Systems of states. Leicester: Leicester University Press, pp. 115–117. [in English]
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License International CC-BY that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
