The dichotomy “culture – civilization” in the Anglo-American and Western European scientific discourse

Authors

  • Vasyl' Shynkaruk National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine
  • Halyna Salata College of Kiev University of Culture, Ukraine
  • Tetyana Danylova National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.2.2018.161601

Keywords:

culture, civilization, society, history, development, material and non-material culture

Abstract

The purpose of the article is the analysis the interpretation of the concepts of culture and civilization in the Anglo-American and Western European scientific discourse. Methodology. The authors have used integrative anthropological approach, comparative historical analysis, and philosophical hermeneutics. The scientific novelty lies in the formulation and development of a multifaceted problem that requires interdisciplinary research by both world and Ukrainian science; revealing the correlation between the concepts of culture and civilization in the Anglo-American and Western European traditions; as well as authors’ interpretation of this correlation. Conclusions. The concepts of culture and civilization are not identical, although they are closely related to one another. Culture can exist on its own, whereas civilization cannot be called a civilization unless it includes a particular culture. Civilization is “empty” if it is not based on its own culture. Culture comprises material and non-material aspects. Intangible elements of customs and traditions, as well as beliefs, attitudes, preferences, etc., affect a person dramatically. Civilization could be viewed as a whole, and this integrated whole is mostly material, although its essential component – culture – could be non-material. The process of globalization changes civilization as well as culture, which, in turn, will determine the face of the coming civilization.

Author Biographies

Vasyl' Shynkaruk, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine

Doctor of Philology, Professor, Dean of the Humanities and Pedagogy Faculty

Halyna Salata, College of Kiev University of Culture

PhD in History, Director

Tetyana Danylova, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine

PhD in Philosophy, Associate Professor, Department of Philosophy

References

Гердер И.Г. Идеи к философии истории человечества / И.Г. Гердер. – М.: Наука, 1977. – 703с.

Кант И. Идея всеобщей истории во всемирно-гражданском плане / И. Кант. [Електронний ресурс]. –

Режим доступу:http://www.nsu.ru/filf/rpha/lib/kant-idea.htm.

Манн Т. Размышления аполитичного / Т. Манн. [Електронний ресурс]. – Режим доступу: http://magazines.russ.ru/vestnik/2008/24/ma15.html

Руссо Ж.-Ж. Рассуждения o науках и искусствах / Ж.-Ж. Руссо // Руссо, Ж.-Ж. Избр. Сочинения в 3т.– Т.1. – М.: Гос. издательство худ. литературы, 1961. – сс. 41-64.

Хантингтон С. Столкновение цивилизаций / С. Хантингтон. – Пер. Т. Велимеева, Ю Новикова. – М.: ООО "АСТ", 2003. –603с.

Шпенглер О. Закат Европы / О. Шпенглер. – Новосибирск: ВО "Наука". Сибирская издательская фи-рма, 1993. – 592с. [Електронний ресурс]. – Режим доступу: http://www.gumer.info/bibliotek_Buks/History/Speng/index.php.

Bloom A. The Closing of the American Mind / A. Bloom. – Simon & Schuster, 1988. –392p.

Botz-Bornstein T. What is the Difference between Culture and Civilization? Two Hundred Fifty Years of Confusion / T. Botz-Bornstein // Comparative Civilizations Review. – 2012. – №66. –P.10-28.

Danylova T.V. The Theory of Civilizations Through the Lens of Contemporary Humanities / T.V. Danylova // Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research. – 2016. – Is. 9.– P.55-62

Danylova T.V. The Desire for Recognition in the Context of Francis Fukuyama’s Universal History / T.V. Danylova // Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research. – 2016. – Is.10. – P.69-77.

Rousseau J.-J. Discours sur les sciences et les arts /J.-J. Rousseau. – URL: http://classiques.uqac.ca/classiques/Rousseau_jj/discours_sciences_arts/discours_sciences_arts.pdf.

Salata G. Human Nature in the Problem Field of Cultural Anthropology / G. Salata. – Ural Research Bulletin. – 2012. – Is. 1. – P.17-23.

Tylor E.B. Primitive Culture: Research into the Development of Mythology, Philosophy, Religion, Language, Art, and Custom / E.B. Tylor – London: John Murray, Albemarle Street, W, 1920. – Vol.1. – 528p. URL : https://archive.org/details/primitiveculture01tylouoft.

Tylor E.B. The Origins of Culture (Harper torchbooks) / E.B. Tylor. – New York: Harper & Row, 1958.416p.

Трач Ю. С. 2015. №3. Високі технології у контексті історичного розвитку техногенної цивілізації. Вісник Національної академії керівних кадрів культури і мистецтв. 2015. № 3. К.: Міленіум. С.70-75

Herder, J.G. (1977). Outlines of a Philosophy of the History of Man. Moscow: Nauka [in Russian]

Kant, I. (n.d.). Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Aim. Retrieved from http://www.nsu.ru/filf/rpha/lib/kant-idea.htm [in Russian]

Mann, T. (2008). Reflections of a Nonpolitical Man. Retrieved fromhttp://magazines.russ.ru/vestnik/2008/24/ma15.html [in Russian]

Rousseau, J.-J. (1961). Discourse on the Arts and Sciences. Selected Works in 3 volumes. V.1. Moscow: Gos. izdatelstvo khud. Literatury [in Russian]

Huntington, S. (2003). The Clash of Civilizations (T. Velimeeva, Yu. Novikova Trans). Moscow: LLC “AST”

[in Russian]

Spengler, O. (1993). The Decline of the West. Novosibirsk: VO “Nauka”. Retrieved from http://www.gumer.info/bibliotek_Buks/History/Speng/index.php [in Russian]

Bloom, A. (1988). The Closing of the American Mind. Simon &Schuster.

Botz-Bornstein, T. (2012). What is the Difference between Culture and Civilization? Two Hundred Fifty Years of Confusion. Comparative Civilizations Review, 66, 10-28.

Danylova, T.V. (2016). The Theory of Civilizations Through the Lens of Contemporary Humanities. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, 9, 55-62, DOI:10.15802/ampr2016/72231.

Danylova, T.V. (2016). The Desire for Recognition in the Context of Francis Fukuyama’s Universal History. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, 10, 69-77, DOI:10.15802/ampr.v0i10.87303.

Rousseau, J.-J. (2002). Discours sur les sciences et les arts /J.-J. Rousseau. Retrieved from http://classiques.uqac.ca/classiques/Rousseau_jj/discours_sciences_arts/discours_sciences_arts.pdf.

Salata,G.(2012). Human Naturein the Problem Field of Cultural Anthropology.Ural Research Bulletin,1,17-23.

Tylor,E.B.(1920). Primitive Culture: Research into the Development of Mythology,Philosophy,Religion, Language, Art, and Custom. London: John Murray, Albemarle Street, W, 1. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/primitiveculture01tylouoft

Tylor, E.B. (1958). The Origins of Culture (Harper torchbooks). New York: Harper &Row.

Trach, Yu. (2015). High technologies in the context of the historical development of technogenic civilization. Visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii kerivnykh kadriv kultury i mystetstv Kyiv: Millennium, 3, 70-75 [in Ukraine].

Published

2018-04-24

Issue

Section

Культурологія