PROBLEMS OF PROCEDURAL RIGHTS ABUSE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.3.2018.173508Abstract
Abstract. In this article, the monographic and scientific publications, the practice of unfair realization of rights by the participants of the process are analyzed based on the analysis of certain international legal acts. First of all, we study the legislative consolidation of procedural dishonesty and its consequences, and the impact of presumptions on the identification of procedural dishonesty facts. Based on attribution to investigative and adversary models, specific problems associated with procedural dishonesty are identified, and conclusions about the ways of unfair realization of rights by the participants of the process are formulated.
Key words: process, subjective rights, realization, responsibility, bad faith, abuse.
References
Advisors I.V. Abuse of law in the electoral process. M .: Chero, 2010. 124 p.
Volkov A.V. Civil Rights Abuse: Problems of Theory and Practice: Monograph. M: Walters Kluver, 2009. 464 p.
Gautrais V. Fictions and presumptions: legal tools of integration of technologies // Legal security and
technical security: independence or miscegenation: conference organization International Program of Scientific
Cooperation (CRDP / CECOJI). Montreal, 2003.
Herlitz G.N. The Meaning of the Term “Prima Facie” // Louisiana Law Review. 1994. Vol. 55, iss. 2. P.
-408.
Lowe Jr. E.N. The California Evidence Code: Presumptions // California Law Review. 1965. Vol. 53, iss. 5. P. 1439–1493.
Andrews N. Abuse of Process in English Civil Litigation; Fentiman R. Abuse of Procedural Rights: the Position of English Law / Abuse of Procedural Rights: Comparative Standards of Procedural Fairness, ed. M. Taruffo. Kulver Law International, 1999.
Hazard G. Abuse of Procedural Rights: Regional Report for United States / Abuse of Procedural Rights: Comparative Standards of Procedural Fairness, ed. M. Taruffo. Kulver Law International, 1999.
Taniguchi J. Abuse of Procedural Rights: a Japanese Perspective / Abuse of Procedural Rights: Comparative Standards of Procedural Fairness, ed. M. Taruffo. Kulver Law International, 1999.
Dondi A. Abuse of Procedural Rights: Regional Report for Italy and France / Abuse of Procedural Rights: Comparative Standards of Procedural Fairness, ed. M. Taruffo. Kulver Law International, 1999.
Sohn L. How American International Lawyers Prepared for the San Francisco Bill of Rights / American Journal of International Law. Volume 89. July 1995. № 3. P. 540-554.
Patrick X. Bout Trade Usages: Article of Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods // www.cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cisg/biblio/bout.html
Yudin A.V. Civil proceeding and responsibility: Monograph. St. Petersburg: Law Book, 2009. 624 p.
Taruffo Michele. Abuse of procedural law // Process log. - 2009. - № 177. - p. 187.
Soares K.E. Abuse of procedural law in the new Brazilian Code of Civil Procedure // Herald of the civil process. - 2015. - № 4. - p. 188.
Federal law of March 30, 1998 N 54-ФЗ “On ratification of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and its Protocols”.
http://www.echr.coe.int/NR/rdonlyres/6AC1A02E-9A3C-4E06-94EF- E0BD377731DA/0/REGLEMENT_EN_Avril2011.pdf
Aleksandr V. Kornyushkin, Marina V. Markhgeym, Alevtina E. Novikova, Fedor F. Chaplickij, Irina S. Chalykh Oath in international law standards // The Turkish Online Journal of Design, Art and Communication TOJDAC. 2017. April. Special Edition. P. 323-327.
Belyaeva, G. S., Makogon, B. V., Bezugly, S. N., Prokhorova, M. L., & Szpoper, D. (2017). Basic Ideas of State Power Limitation in Political and Legal Doctrine. J. Pol. & L., 10, 197.
Ol'ga, V., Kuksin, I. N., Makogon, B. V., Spektor, L. A., & Vladimirova, O. V. (2018). Restrictive- regulatory potential of procedural standard. Revista Publicando, 5(14), 830-836.
Kuksin, I. N., Markhgeym, M. V., Novikova, A. E., & Tonkov, E. E. (2016). Justice as Principle: Aspects of Genesis in Social and Regulatory Systems. The Social Sciences, 11(10), 2367-2370.
Makogon, B. V., Markhgeym, M. V., Novikova, A. E., Nikonova, L. I., & Stus, N. V. (2018). Constitutional Justice in Circumstances of Public Authority Limits. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 7(2), 722-728.
Butko, L. V., Markhgeym, M. V., Novikova, A. E., Pozharova, L. A., & Tonkov, E. E. (2017). Personal Dignity in the European Legal Culture. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 6(4), 296-303.
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
