Artistic and interpretative discourse of bachianism in the glocalizated space (on the example of the reception of the composer’s clavier music in Lviv)

Authors

  • Stepan Solansky Mykola Lysenko Lviv National Academy of Music, Ukraine
  • Zoryana Lastovetska-Solanska Mykola Lysenko Lviv National Academy of Music, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.2.2019.177786

Keywords:

globalization, glocalization, artistic and interpretive discourse, J.S. Bach, clavier creativity, reception, pianist

Abstract

The Purpose of the Article is to investigate the artistic and interpretive discourse of J.S. Bach’s clavier creativity, its reception in Lviv as an object of globalized cultural and artistic surroundings. The methodology of the research is based on the application of historical, musicological, artistic and critical, culturological and analytical approaches, which enabled to analyze the basic principles of the criteria of globalization, the intensity of global and local interactions and the speed of the global reactions on the example of reception and the spread of Bach’s creativity, to trace certain models of interpretation in the historical perspective, taking into account historically formed artistic priorities and tastes of Lviv residents. Such a methodology made it possible to accentuate the modern and postmodern stages of the globalization of cultural and spiritual processes in the projection into the interpretive discourse of Bach’s creation in a specific region. The scientific novelty consists in formulating the definition of artistic and interpretive discourse, in expanding the notions of the globalized and glocalizated socio and cultural surroundings, in the study of the performing discourse of the Bach’s clavier works in Lviv through the prism of its artistic and cultural traditions and achievements. Conclusions. The dominant views of the interactions between global and local are the active apperception of recognized world models of the interpretation of Bach’s clavier music in Lviv. Its artistic and interpretive discourse and traditions of reception are characterized by a symbiosis of external factors and internal conditions. The simultaneous existence of romantic, authentic performances, the performing of works by the German composer with jazz pianists enriches the rich palette the Bach’s Compendium in the glocalizated artistic and interpretive space of Lviv.

Author Biographies

Stepan Solansky, Mykola Lysenko Lviv National Academy of Music

Candidate of Art Sciences Ph.D., Assistant Professor, Departments of Special Piano and General and Specialized Piano

Zoryana Lastovetska-Solanska, Mykola Lysenko Lviv National Academy of Music

Candidate of Art Sciences Ph.D., Assistant Professor, Department of History of Music

References

Колягина А.Е. Феномен бахианства в свете исторических и культурных процессов прошлого и настоящих дней // Исторические, философские, политические и юридические науки, культурология и искусствоведение. Вопросы теории и практики. В 2-х ч. Ч. 2. Тамбов: Грамота, 2016. № 11 (73). C. 127-133.

Олійник О.М. Глокалізація: етапи розвитку // Грані. Дніпропетровськ, 2010. № 5 (73). С. 60-64.

Khondker, Habibul Haque. (2004). Glocalization as Globalization: Evolution of a Sociological Concept In book: Bangladesh e-Journal of Sociology 1 (2). 12-20.

Krugman, Paul & Venables, J. Anthony (1995). Globalization and the Іnequality of Nations In book: The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 110, No. 4. 857-880.

Music Glocalization: Heritage and Innovation in a Digital Age (2018). Hebert, D. G. & Rykowski, M. (Eds.). Cambridge Scholars. 431.

Robertson, R. (2003). Globalization or glocalization? In book: Globalisation. Critical concept in sociology. Robertson R., White K. E. (Ed.) London. Vol. III. 31-51.

Robertson, R. (1992). Globalization: social theory and global culture. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. 211.

Kolyagina, А.Ye. (2016). The phenomenon of bachianism in the light of historical and cultural processes of the past and present days. Historical, philosophical, political and legal sciences, cultural studies and art history. Questions of theory and practice. In 2 vol.; Vol. 2. Таmbov: Hramota. № 11 (73). 127-133. [in Russian].

Оliinyk, О.М. (2010). Glocalization: stages of development. Hrani. Dnipropetrovsk. № 5 (73). 60-64. [in Ukrainian].

Khondker, H.H. (2004). Glocalization as Globalization: Evolution of a Sociological Concept In book: Bangladesh e-Journal of Sociology 1 (2). 12-20. [in English].

Krugman, P. & Venables, J.A. (1995). Globalization and the Іnequality of Nations. In book: The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 110, No. 4, 857-880. [in English].

Music Glocalization: Heritage and Innovation in a Digital Age (2018). Hebert, D. G. & Rykowski, M. (Eds.). Cambridge Scholars. 431. [in English].

Robertson, R. (2003). Globalization or glocalization? In book: Globalisation. Critical concept in sociology. Robertson R., White K. E. (Ed.). London. Vol. III. 31-51. [in English].

Robertson, R. (1992). Globalization: social theory and global culture. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. 211. [in English].

Published

2019-05-28

Issue

Section

Мистецтвознавство