HUMAN RESPONSIBILITIES AS A LEGAL CATEGORY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.1.2018.178190Abstract
Abstract. This paper provides a definition of the duty concept from various points of view: philosophical,
philological, legal. We considered various philosophical views on the duty concept as such, and the duty concept in legal sense. We analyzed the human rights situation in the modern world on the basis of the United Nations data. The authors assert about the dialectical unity of the human rights and responsibilities as components of the legal status of an individual. We indicated the need for a balance between the human rights and responsibilities as integral parts of the legal status of an individual. We presented the concepts of human responsibilities from the point of view of Christianity and Islam, considered and analyzed the classification of human responsibilities in Islam and Christianity. We considered the historical aspects of the formation (the need to form) of the concept of human responsibilities. We proposed a proprietary formulation (concept) of the human responsibilities as a legal category. We proposed our own classification of human rights, which will be based on the religious classifications of human responsibilities, namely the classification of human responsibilities in Christianity and Islam. We substantiated the necessity of creating a universal list of human responsibilities as a tool to counter modern global challenges and a tool aimed at supporting existing social groups and social institutions of society.
Key words: human responsibilities, human rights, legal status of a person, social institutions, Islam, Christianity.
References
https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G14/113/90/PDF/G1411390.pdf?OpenElement
https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G13/159/95/PDF/G1315995.pdf?OpenElement
ng Submitted to the High-level Expert Group Meeting on
"Human Rights and Human Responsibilities in the Age of Terrorism" 1-2, April 2005, Santa Clara University
Marx K. and Engels F. Collected Works. Volume 16. М.: GIPL, 1960, p. 4
Cicero. About Responsibilities. – Alias. About Old Age. About Friendship. About Responsibilities. М., 1993.
Kant I. Metaphysics of Morals II. Introduction, II. - Works in 6 volumes, v. 4(2). М., 1965., p. 316.
Schopenhauer A.. On the Basis of Morality [II, 5]. – Alias. Freedom of Will and Morality. М., 1992.
Koran, Zariyat, 51/56, http://quran-online.ru/51/abuadel
Koran, Bakara, 2/195m http://quran-online.ru/51/abuadel
Koran, Isra, 17/23, http://quran-online.ru/17/abuadel
Koran, Nakhl, 16/90, http://quran-online.ru/16/abuadel
Bible, Psalter, 2:11, http://azbyka.ru/biblia/?Ps.2:11
The Bible, the Apostle Paul, a message to the Jews The Bible, the Apostle Paul, a message to the Jews, 11:6,
http://azbyka.ru/biblia/?Hebr.11:6
The Bible, Apostle Paul 1-st Epistle to the Corinthians, 14:20, http://azbyka.ru/biblia/?1Cor.14:20
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).