POST-COMMUNIST CULTURE IN THE METAMODERN MIRROR: A DISCOURSE ANALYSIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.3.2019.191727Keywords:
postcommunist culture, postmodernism, metamodern, discourse, rhetoric.Abstract
The purpose of the article is to carry out a discursive analysis of a post-communist culture in the context of metamodern. The methodology consists of theoretical-interpretational models of discourse analysis of post-communist culture, which is carried out in the article as a poetic and rhetorical interpretation of the discourse of the power of Soviet and post-Soviet culture. The monism of the use of the increasing synecdoche in the "Soviet culture" in the post-Soviet culture has multiplied, the synecdoche is replaced by metonymy, which, in turn, represents the metaphorical transformations of speech. Scientific novelty consists in revealing the features of the imaginative constellations of the rhetoric of the post-Soviet discourse, which have a composite, mannerist character without clearly defined ideological, ethical, aesthetic priorities of interpretation and description of cultural values. Conclusions. The discourse of post-Soviet culture demonstrates the traditional rhetorical instrumentality characteristic of the Soviet culture because the monism of increasing synecdoche is pluralized, the speech has signs of a mannerist discourse, in which the composition as cultural integrity is formed by a composite mixture of syntagm without prioritizing combination definition. Metamodern, as a widely stated paradigm of cultural creation, describes the grammatical whole only as relativistic syntax – a-topos, which even by the models of the Liege school of neo-rhetoric is a fragmentary and overly metaphorical description of cultural creation. The "completion" of the rhetorical model of discourse to the cultural provides adequate horizons for discursive analysis, which must be cultural and be formed on the basis of a reconstruction of post-communist culture as a manneristic (composite) integrity. Therefore, the problem of the post-communist culture functioning in the contemporary space of cultural creation requires the instrumental discursive analysis regarding the presentation of meaning, figurative and cultural constants, and transformative mechanisms of the text.
References
Bilyj, O. (1995). The newest metamorphoses of the Soviet „novoiazu”. Political science of post-communism. Kyiv: Politychna dumka [in Ukrainian].
Bystrycjkyj, E. (1995). Post-communist philosophy of the post-communist era. Political science of post-communism. Kyiv: Politychna dumka [in Ukrainian].
Bychkov V. V. (2002). Aesthetics. Moskow: Gardarika [in Russian].
Diubua, Zh., Pyr, F., & Trynon, A. (1986). General rhetoric: trans. from French. Moskow: Progress [in Russian].
Notes about Metamodernism. METAMODERN. Retrieved from: metamodernizm.ru/notes-on-metamodernism [in Russian].
Legenkiy, Yu. G. (2005). On architecture (essays on interior design theory). Kyiv: KNUKiM [in Russian].
Mezhuev, V. M. (1984). Universal labor as culture substance. Problems of the philosophy of culture: experience of historical materialistic analysis. Moskow: Mysl [in Russian].
Pivovar, Ye. I. (2010). Post-Soviet space: alternatives to integration: historical outline. St. Petersburg: Aleteyya [in Russian].
Polokhalo, V. (1995). Ukrainian political system against the background of post-communist transformation. Political science of post-communism. Kyiv: Politychna dumka [in Ukrainian].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).