Decolonisation of Corporation in Ukrainian Dance: Postcolonial Analysis of Soviet Legacy and Body Memory
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.4.2025.351952Keywords:
soviet legacy, corporeality, bodily memory, decolonisation, Ukrainian dance, somatic practices, repertoire politics, educational models, aesthetics of resistance, cultural identityAbstract
The purpose of the article is to analyse the influence of Soviet colonial cultural policy on the formation of normative bodily aesthetics, educational models, and repertoire strategies in the choreographic art of Ukraine, as well as to identify contemporary trends aimed at the return of bodily autonomy, the activation of bodily memory, and artistic subjectivity. The research methodology. A comparative method was used to compare Soviet normative bodily models and modern Ukrainian decolonisation tendencies in dance, which allows us to identify transformations in the interpretation of corporeality, repertoire, and pedagogical approaches; a postcolonial approach (analytical optics) to interpret the mechanisms of colonisation of corporeality and the norming of movement codes in the Soviet cultural paradigm; a hermeneutic method to understand bodily and movement codes as carriers of cultural, ideological, and memory meanings; and a culturological analysis to identify the relationships between corporeality, cultural identity, ideology, and representational strategies in dance art. The scientific novelty of the study lies in the comparative analysis of Soviet normative bodily models and modern Ukrainian decolonisation practices in choreography. The concept of normative bodily memory as a consequence of imperial cultural pressure is substantiated and the role of somatic practices in the processes of decolonisation of the body is determined. It is proved that modern Ukrainian dance currently forms an aesthetics of resistance, in which the body appears as a carrier of memory, trauma, and cultural identity. Conclusions. Based on comparative analysis, it was established that the Soviet colonial model of dance corporeality was aimed at unification, standardisation, and discipline of the body in accordance with ideological guidelines, which was accompanied by the suppression of individual, authentic, and traumatic bodily memory. In modern Ukrainian dance, an opposite paradigm is being formed – the body appears as a carrier of historical experience, memory and resistance, and somatic practices acquire the meaning of tools for decolonisation, restoration of subjectivity, and cultural identity. Thus, the decolonisation of Ukrainian dance turns out to be a cultural and political process that involves rethinking repertoire policy, educational models and the very logic of interaction with corporeality, transforming dance from an ‘art of loyalty’ into an art of resistance and self-determination.
References
Hrytsenko, Ya. (2023). Somatic practices in the art of dance: influence, interaction and a method of working with the body. Actual Issues of the Humanities, 66 (1), 50–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24919/2308-4863/66-1-8 [in Ukrainian].
Klymchuk, I. S. (2020). The phenomenon of the national in Soviet culture (on the example of choreographic art). Ukrainian Culture: Past, Present, Ways of Development, 35, 266–270 [in Ukrainian].
Pavliuk, T. S. (2018). Somatic Practices in Modern Ballroom Choreography. Culture and Modernity, 1, 97–102 [in Ukrainian].
Pidburtna, D. (2025). Decolonisation and art: What was, what is, and what will be? Review of the book ‘The Return of History. Decoloniality and Art in Ukraine after 1991’. Sensor Media. Retrieved from: https://sensormedia.com.ua/books/dekolonizacziya-i-mystecztvo-shho-bulo-shho-ye-i-shho-bude-oglyad-knyzhky-povernennya-istoriyi-dekolonialnist-ta-mystecztvo-v-ukrayini-pislya-1991-roku/?utm_source [in Ukrainian].
Pidlipska, A., & Tsvetkova, L. (2025). Processing cultural traumas in dance practices: historical context. DANCE STUDIES, 6 (2), 106–115 [in Ukrainian].
Pidlipskyi, A. I. (2020). Sociocultural and artistic factors in the formation and development of folk-stage choreography in Ukraine. In A.M. Pidlypska & T.V. Kunts (Eds.), Traditions and innovations in choreographic culture (pp. 56–58). Kyiv: Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts [in Ukrainian].
Prygoda-Donets, T. (2023). Dance as a Form of Artistic Thinking and Cultural Communication. Fine Art and Culture Studies, 4, 191–198, DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/facs-2023-4-26 [in Ukrainian].
Khokhlov, T. I. & Plahotniuk, O. A. (2023). Overcoming the crisis of the Soviet period in the activity of amateur dance groups. In Modernisation of today’s science: Experience and trends. Scientia, 314–315 [in Ukrainian].
Shumilova, V. (2025). Choreography as a space of non-verbal communication in conditions of social crises: Cognitive-communicative and therapeutic potential. Herald of National Academy of Culture and Arts Management, (2), 337–343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.2.2025.339024 [in Ukrainian].
Akinleye, A. & Kindred, H. (2019) Wright-ing the Somatic: Narrating the Bodily. Journal of Dance & Somatic Practices, 11 (1), 3–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1386/jdsp.11.1.3_2 [in English].
Marina Campos Magalhães, (2023). Somatic Approaches in the Educational Formation in Dance: from the dryness of the background to curriculum as cartography. Revista Brasileira de Estudos da Presença. https://journals.openedition.org/rbep/4678 [in Spanish].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License International CC-BY that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).