Activities of Zoia Haidai on Kyiv Opera Stage during the Period of Late Stalinism (1946-1953)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.4.2025.351999Keywords:
Z. Haidai, Kyiv Opera, the period of late Stalinism, resolutions of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Ukraine (Bolsheviks), repertoire policyAbstract
The purpose of the article is to investigate the specifics of the activities of singer Z. Haidai on the stage of the Kyiv Opera in 1946–1953, which took place during the period of late Stalinism, in particular, to identify working conditions, opportunities for creative realisation, prospects, as well as to analyse the creative achievements of the famous artist in accordance with the principles of repertoire policy and determine their artistic value in the context of today’s requirements. The methodology of the work consists of the use of source study method to analyse archival documents – reviews of productions, epistolary heritage of Z. Haidai, as well as other materials on the topic of the study, specifically historical – to determine the influence of political processes of the late Stalinist period on the functioning of the Kyiv Opera and the activities of its soloist Z. Haidai, general scientific methods (analysis, synthesis, generalisation) – in order to thoroughly study the issue and form a substantiated conclusion. The scientific novelty of the article lies in its examination of the specifics of work of singer Z. Haidai on the stage of the Kyiv Opera during the period of late Stalinism, 1946–1953. Thanks to the processing of archival sources, it was possible to find out what the working conditions were, the possibilities of realising creative potential, prospects for the future, as a result of the issuance of resolutions of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Ukraine (Bolsheviks), which influenced the functioning of the theatre and the formation of its repertoire policy. Conclusions. The activities of singer Z. Haidai on the Kyiv Opera stage during the period of late Stalinism (1946–1953) cannot be considered very successful today, because the destructive influence of repressive resolutions of the above-mentioned period on the formation of the theatre’s repertoire policy extremely politicized this process, limiting the right of artists to freedom of creativity and making it impossible to stage the best performances of the Ukrainian and Western European opera repertoire without hindrance. First of all, those performances that fit into the ideological framework of Stalin’s totalitarian regime were staged, although this did not guarantee them stable success with the public. Under such working conditions, Z. Haidai was unable to fully realise her creative potential on the opera stage. Characterising her work of 1946–1953, first of all, participation in premiere performances, the most significant from the point of view of the present were the parts she performed as Manon Lescaut in the opera-montage ‘Manon’ by J. Massenet, Halka in the opera of the same name by S. Moniuszko, and Halia in ‘Drowned’ by M. Lysenko. Within the framework of the decommunisation process, there is no chance for the propaganda operas of the late Stalinism to return to the stages of Ukrainian theatres.
References
Album of newspaper clippings with reviews and notes about concerts and opera performances – “Otello”, “La traviata”, “Eugene Onegin”, “The Young Guard”. (1940–1948). Central State Archives Museum of Literature and Arts of Ukraine. F. 147. Descr. 1. Case 336. 365 sheets [in Ukrainian and Russian].
Album of newspaper and magazine clippings with reviews and notes about concerts, opera performances – “Drowned”, “Halka”, about the Decade of Ukrainian Literature and Art in Moscow. (1936–1960). Central State Archives Museum of Literature and Arts of Ukraine. F. 147. Descr. 1. Case 335. 195 sheets [in Ukrainian and Russian].
Berehova, O. (2016). Kostiantyn Dankevych: Paradoxes of Creative Biography. Scientific Bulletin of the Ukrainian Tchaikovsky National Academy of Music, 114, 110–125 [in Ukrainian].
Prynts, A. V. (2010). Hmyria B. R. Diaries. 1936–1969. Folyo [in Russian and Ukrainian].
Letters of Borys Ten to Haidai Z. M. (June 4, 1946 – March 25, 1955). Central State Archives Museum of Literature and Arts of Ukraine F. 147. Descr. 1. Case 189. 10 sheets [in Ukrainian].
“Materials for the history of the opera theatre in Kyiv”. Draft notes in 2 notebooks. Manuscript. (1936–1947). Central State Archives Museum of Literature and Arts of Ukraine. F. 146. Descr. 1. Case 59. 204 sheets [in Ukrainian and Russian].
Minutes of the meetings of the Arts Council for 1947. (June 14, 1947 – December 6, 1947). Central State Archives Museum of Literature and Arts of Ukraine. F. 573. Descr. 1. Case 61. 46 sheets [in Russian and Ukrainian].
Minutes of the meetings of creative workers to discuss productions of performances for 1952. (April 15, 1952 – December 20, 1952). Central State Archives Museum of Literature and Arts of Ukraine. F. 573. Descr. 1. Case 169. 11 sheets [in Russian].
Siruk, N. (2016). Resolutions of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Ukraine (Bolsheviks) – documents for the study of ideological campaigns in Ukraine (the second half of the 40s – the beginning of the 50s of the 20th century). Scientific Notes of Volodymyr Hnatiuk Ternopil National Pedagogical University, 2(3), 158–162 [in Ukrainian].
Transcripts of the meetings of the Arts Council for 1948. (February 3, 1948 – November 23, 1948). Central State Archives Museum of Literature and Arts of Ukraine. F. 573. Descr. 1. Case 81. 224 sheets [in Russian].
Transcripts of the meetings of the Arts Council for 1949. (January 15, 1949 – November 18, 1949). Central State Archives Museum of Literature and Arts of Ukraine. F. 573. Descr. 1. Case 95. 126 sheets [in Russian].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License International CC-BY that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).