Visual interpretations of ‘The Tale of Ihor’s Campaign’ in the graphic cycles of V. Lopata, H. Yakutovych, and V. Yefymenko: compositional strategies and iconographic models
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.1.2026.356276Keywords:
book graphics, illustration, iconography, symbolismAbstract
The purpose of this article is to identify and analyse the features of visual interpretation of ‘The Tale of Ihor’s Campaign’ in the graphic cycles by V. Lopata, H. Yakutovich, and V. Yefimenko, to examine their compositional principles, iconographic models, technical approaches, and methods of interpreting key motifs of the poem, as well as to reveal the commonalities and differences in the authors’ conceptual strategies. The research methodology is based on a combination of formal-stylistic, iconographic, and comparative analyses, which allows tracing the specific characteristics of artistic interpretations of ‘The Tale of Ihor’s Campaign’ by different authors. The formal-plastic approach enables the identification of compositional principles, rhythm, and visual accents; iconographic analysis makes it possible to outline stable motifs and symbolic structures. The comparative method is used to juxtapose individual artistic strategies and to reveal the evolution of visual solutions in the context of the development of Ukrainian graphic art. The integrated application of these methods ensures a comprehensive reading of the visual interpretations and their correlation with the literary source. Scientific novelty. For the first time, a comprehensive comparative analysis has been conducted of three key graphic cycles of the second half of the 20th century (by V. Lopata, H. Yakutovich, and V. Yefimenko) dedicated to ‘The Tale of Ihor’s Campaign’. Conclusions. The study demonstrates that the visual interpretations of ‘The Tale of Ihor’s Campaign’ in the work of Ukrainian graphic artists (V. Lopata, H. Yakutovich, V. Yefimenko) form a complex, multidimensional discourse combining historical reconstruction, narrative visualisation, and individual artistic strategies. The use of formal-stylistic, iconographic, and comparative methods made it possible to identify the specifics of each artist’s visual language and outline key trends in the development of book graphics from the second half of the 20th to the early 21st century. The analysed illustrative cycles reveal different models of reinterpreting the epic text – from monumentally generalised stylistics to psychologically immersive and symbolically rich solutions. Despite differences in technique, style, and artistic intent, all artists demonstrate a commitment to preserving the semantic complexity of the Old Rus’ work while adapting its imagery to the contemporary cultural context.
References
Lahutenko, O. (2025). Interpretation of the theme of Ancient Rus in the graphics of Heorgii Yakutovych: psychology of the creative process. Artistic culture. Current issues, 21(1), 19–27 [in Ukrainian].
Spasskova, O. P. (2020). The work of Viktor Yefymenko in the context of the development of Ukrainian book graphics (the last third of the 20th century): https://www.uacademic.info/ua/document/0420U101676 [in Ukrainian].
Spasskova, O. P. (2016). Artistic interpretation of historical images in the series of engravings by V. Yefymenko for ‘The Tale of Ihor’s Campaign’. Bulletin of the Kharkiv State Academy of Design and Arts, 2, 48–55 [in Ukrainian].
Hrushevskyi, M. (1993). History of Ukrainian literature (Vol. 2). Lybid [in Ukrainian].
Bilous, P. (2015). Why ‘The Tale of Ihor’s Campaign’ was created. Zhytomyr Literary Studies, (8), 20–32 [in Ukrainian]
Myshanych, O. (Ed.). (1986). The Tale of Ihor’s Campaign. Radianska shkola [in Ukrainian].
The Tale of Ihor’s Campaign. (1985). Dnipro [in Ukrainian].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License International CC-BY that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).